Minimal tracklisting?

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
popfreak
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat 08 Feb 2003, 3:45 pm

#46 Post by popfreak »

From PSB OS


Pet Shop second single release from "Fundamental" will be released on July 24 on three formats:

CD1:
1. Minimal (radio edit)
2. In private (Performed by Pet Shop Boys and Elton John) (Stuart Crichton 7")

CD2:
1. Minimal (radio edit)
2. Minimal (Tocadisco's Sunday at Space Remix)
3. Minimal (M Factor Remix)

DVD:
1. Minimal (Telex Hell mix)
2. Blue on blue
3. No time for tears (Unreleased 7-inch mix)
4. Minimal (video)

"In private" is the seven-inch mix of the track which appears in a longer mix on "Fundamentalism".

"Blue on blue" was written and recorded by Pet Shop Boys in 2003 (at the same time as "Luna Park" and "Casanova in Hell").

The mix of "No time for tears" was made by Tim Weidner at Sarm West studios last year when it was considered as a single release to promote the "Battleship Potemkin"
album.

The video was made in Paris, directed by Don Cameron. Unlike "I'm with Stupid", Neil and Chris feature heavily!

On July 27th, a limited-edition seven-inch, clear plastic vinyl single of "Minimal"/"In private" will be released.

User avatar
!
Posts: 2327
Joined: Mon 23 Jan 2006, 7:13 pm

#47 Post by ! »

popfreak wrote:"In private" is the seven-inch mix of the track which appears in a longer mix on "Fundamentalism".
So the versions of Fugitive and In private on Fundamentalism are the original versions! 8)
Glad that's cleared up :D

*edit*
I take it it's this M Factor that's done a remix -
http://www.discogs.com/artist/M+Factor

and not this one -
http://www.discogs.com/artist/M+Factor+(2), I love that song Pop Muzik :D 8) boogie with a suitcase :lol:

User avatar
Ewok
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:58 pm

#48 Post by Ewok »

! wrote:
popfreak wrote:"In private" is the seven-inch mix of the track which appears in a longer mix on "Fundamentalism".
So the versions of Fugitive and In private on Fundamentalism are the original versions! 8)
Glad that's cleared up :D
Where do they say that?. You can also do a 7" edit of a remix.

User avatar
!
Posts: 2327
Joined: Mon 23 Jan 2006, 7:13 pm

#49 Post by ! »

Ewok wrote:Where do they say that?. You can also do a 7" edit of a remix.
Well, I thought that but...I dunno :?
Fugitive, now, to me sounds like the proper version. In private still sounds like a remix though!
Oh gdstk qwe-om q2359!!!!!!!!!!!11 :evil: :roll:

*edit*
Anyway, the tracklisting is crap whatever it is!
Last edited by ! on Mon 19 Jun 2006, 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DJAMIX
Posts: 3628
Joined: Sat 08 Nov 2003, 3:35 am

#50 Post by DJAMIX »

Great news!!! :D
One can't find the way to peace. Peace is the way itself. (Gandhi)

User avatar
Ewok
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:58 pm

#51 Post by Ewok »

Well, we don't know. I think they didn't record final studio versions, just demos.

Burj

#52 Post by Burj »

stats-freak wrote: 1. Untrue. Can You Forgive Her was also released on two CDs, so were earlier singles like Jealousy, DJ Culture and Being Boring. The German release of London also had only one 'new' studio track included: Positive Role Model.
I made a mistake and should have said Can you forgive her? and not Go West! I thought the second CDs of Jealousy and BB were German imports, which is why I also did not include London...

User avatar
E-Mail Vampire
Posts: 1576
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 7:17 am

#53 Post by E-Mail Vampire »

Awful tracklisting just DVD for me and that is for video and Blue On Blue

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#54 Post by patrick »

Fairly uninspired tracklisting unless the mixes are brilliant. It could be worse however; at least there are two additional mixes on the Japanese Fundamentalism. We could have really gotten hosed otherwise. The new track had better be worth recycling that Elton John rubbish.

User avatar
Kermit
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed 29 Oct 2003, 1:40 pm

#55 Post by Kermit »

At least the Tiga mix isn't on the physical issues..pfew...

Burj

#56 Post by Burj »

stats-freak wrote:
Burj wrote:2. I think this will be the first time an edit of a previously released song has been a B-side. hope this is not an indicator of how things will go in the future.
2. It's not the first time. Back in 1995, the European 2-track cd-single (cardboard sleeve) of Paninaro '95 was backed with an edited version of In The Night; a shorter edit of the version on Disco.
true, but as it was promoting a B-sides album and wanted to highlight their 2 most famous flipside songs then they could just about get away with it, especially as P'95 was not on the album.

There is no excuse for using an edit of a Fundamentalism track as a main B-side to the second single off an album.

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1514
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

#57 Post by Lleonard Pler »

Too bad they took out the U-MYX thing from CD2, it could have been used to get a HQ acapella of the song.

However, it's good to see new remixes, 2 new edits of previous tracks (I'm curious about the NTFF one), and a new track (not a cover, like we feared).

Maybe the Superchumbo remixes, if they really exist, will be promo-only.

Let's hope that the video is good. It looks like it will be their first heavy appearence in a video since 'Nightlife' era.

Technotrancemix

#58 Post by Technotrancemix »

patrick wrote:And quite reasonably, too. Limiting tracks to promos ensures piracy and supports price gouging by vampires like yourself.
Even if these "exclusive tracks" were released commercially, many fans would still be too tight to purchase from thier local record store. The price shows how much people want to pay for them, if they sell that is and I can't imagine people like you even willing to part with 77p for a download track.

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#59 Post by patrick »

Technotrancemix wrote:Even if these "exclusive tracks" were released commercially, many fans would still be too tight to purchase from thier local record store.
Prove it. Launch a poll here to discover how many fans chose not to buy the commercial <i>I'm with Stupid</i> CDs. You're talking out of your ass.
The price shows how much people want to pay for them
...based entirely on the decision to jack up prices by refusing to release them as mass market items. It's basic economics. Putting exclusive tracks only on promos does nothing but increase piracy and line the pockets of those willing to gouge actual fans. One only has to look at the lack of demand for promos featuring the same tracks/sleeve as the commercial release to be aware of this.
I can't imagine people like you even willing to part with 77p for a download track.
You know nothing about me nor my financial situation and habits. Statements like this do nothing but make you look like an idiot.

User avatar
Paulo
Posts: 1254
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:46 am
Has thanked: 3 times

#60 Post by Paulo »

I think the tracklisting is fine.

It's good to see we are back to 2 cds and a dvd.

Post Reply