Minimal tracklisting?

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

#106 Post by Eldritch »

Burj wrote:I wonder why the Tiga mix goes on the vinyl and not the Lobe :?
It might be a mistake also. For some reason, when I ripped Fundamentalism for my mp3 player, for track 7 it reads Minimal (Tiga Remix) instead of Lobe.
Click click drone

Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

#107 Post by Eldritch »

Burj wrote:
Eldritch wrote:
Burj wrote: what about 2 CDs and a DualDisc?
That's an interesting question.
So I decided to email theofficialcharts.com and asked them if an act released a single across a 2-track CD, maxi CD and DualDisc would they all count towards the chart. Here's my reply:

Dualdiscs are indeed chart eligible as long as they conform to all
standard rules regarding tracklisting, packaging etc. All Michael
Jackson's singles have been re-released on DualDisc over the last few
weeks and attained chart positions.
Also the format combination you give above is possible.
Fascinating. Good of you to find that out. I was certain that in this case Domino dancing would be counted as a maxi-CD, therefore making your format combination ineligible.
Click click drone

User avatar
Oznerol
Posts: 2412
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 5:31 am

#108 Post by Oznerol »

Eldritch wrote:
Burj wrote:I wonder why the Tiga mix goes on the vinyl and not the Lobe :?
It might be a mistake also. For some reason, when I ripped Fundamentalism for my mp3 player, for track 7 it reads Minimal (Tiga Remix) instead of Lobe.
Anyway this track information isn´t on the disc itself, it´s an on-line feature: the rip programs search in a data-base made with the information provided by other people that used the program before...the same situation as when somebody mislabeled something on a file-sharing program...and then creates a world wide confusion :P
Last edited by Oznerol on Thu 22 Jun 2006, 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This is not my signature.

User avatar
jamie1978
Posts: 1539
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am

#109 Post by jamie1978 »

a powerful friend wrote:
! wrote:
dannii wrote:seems like PSB really fancy it 'cause they felt they should put it on the b-side too although it's already on Fundamentalism. So, they like it and they're proud of it, they wanna show off their first proper duet with Elton John.
I think it's on the single because of Elton John fans. There's more a chance of them buying the single for that song rather than buying the entire special edition album.
Nah, I think the Boys are just trying to help their friend Elton out financially a bit here. Didn't his musical Lestat flop recently?
Elton is worth over 200m, and singles lose money. So I'd hazard a guess that is not the case.

User avatar
Boy Strange
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue 30 May 2006, 3:45 pm

#110 Post by Boy Strange »

I pay Elton £20 a week to cut my hair.

User avatar
psb-freak
Posts: 6104
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 4:42 pm
Contact:

#111 Post by psb-freak »

Maybe we should just be happy that they release a single...
Interviewer:
-What would you tell someone about yourself if you wanted to impress them?

Chris:
-I´ve got a 12-inch plonker.

Burj

#112 Post by Burj »

psb-freak wrote:Maybe we should just be happy that they release a single...
Yes, I'd be happy if they just released a recording of Neil farting in the bath. We'd all buy it, right?

User avatar
TeCHno PoP
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon 26 Jun 2006, 3:52 pm

#113 Post by TeCHno PoP »

It's a good tracklist I think!
In Private is a very good track, so the 2 track CD is perfect.
I hope the remixes will be good, and I'm very wondering about the "real" b-side, Blue On Blue.
I also like the minimalistic cover (it's the same that I imagined before - I don't lie! :) ).

Burj

#114 Post by Burj »

I forgot to ask N&C about these B-sides last night, but at least we now know there is no other version of Fugitive other than the original demo.

Post Reply