If Obama is a dangerous idiot, then I hate to think what McCain and Palin are!alig wrote:you must be thick as pigs**t to vote for this dangerous idiot, or just devious.
I'd rather have Obama as president over the war-mongering grandad anyday.
You know, for a minute there I coulda sworn it was Republican George W. Bush who has overseen the biggest increase in the Federal Government since FDR, and that it was Republican George W. Bush who instigated the US PATRIOT Act that gave him more control over people than any POTUS in historyalig wrote:and one more thing: the Dimmocrats care for the little guy? they don't! all they care about is enlarging government and having more control over people.
Your Funny Uncle wrote:If a group was overtly right wing in what they said and did and in the message of a large proportion of their songs, they most certainly wouldn't be among my favourites. It wouldn't stop me from liking the odd song, but for sure I wouldn't be calling myself a fan and posting on their messageboard.glennjridge wrote:Your Funny Uncle wrote:I wonder, why would somebody like a pop group that so obviously stand for the opposite of all their beliefs?
Iz it coz dey iz lookin' for a rise?
its because me and alig, even though our politics may fall in line a bit with the right,
dont let politics dictate what music is acceptable to like.
some others however,like blueswan and possibly you,and deschanel are absoulity stuck in the mud and mired with this overpolitical nonsense and most likely would let politics prevent you from liking some artist or group if their politics were on what you view as the wrong side.
I'll always like a good tune, but for me the lyrics need to speak to me in order for me rank an artist among my favourites. I fail to see how this could be interpreted as being "stuck in the mud." It simply means that the meaning behind a song is more important to me than just the music.
i hear you glenn. labor is a typically socialist party: they don't believe in God, but in big government. they also believe in political correctness which is just another kind of censorship. and they are pussilanimous, useful idiots who are too cowardly to fight islam.glennjridge wrote:a very interesting article in the paper today. it was titled sharia-UK.which described the winding path of the UK towards sharia law being allowed with the ok by the gov.
how its starting in baby steps, and for now has to follow the guidlines of british law overall, but it when on to say some police officers in a case for fear of being labeled anti-Islam went against normal procedure and sided with a sharia courts illegal judgement concerning a muslim divorce.these were police officers.
my point being,for a people who seem so worried about seperation of church and state, and abortion rights,and gay marriage...
some of you are clearly very confused.
He's a "Christian", dont'cha know?Danny C wrote:
His trolling is so patently obvious now. For example, there are legitimate criticisms to be made of Obama; the accusation that he's a "communist" who "surrounds himself with terrorists and criminals and racists" is not one of them. "alig" never debates people, he just puts them down and belittles them; when someone repeatedly bests him in an argument, he puts them on ignore. Such intellectual cowardice is shameful.
Didn't Bush just nationalise Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and AIG? Oh shit, there goes your whole argumentalig wrote:if you want a mendacious, ignorant and arrogant idiot for president who's gonna nationalize business and instate socialism, he's your man.
He claims to be. He's certainly a few other things beginning with C.Niall wrote:He's a "Christian", dont'cha know?