Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Flaffer
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed 05 Nov 2003, 4:14 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#61 Post by Flaffer »

which of the tracks would you rate above China and Dirty Tricks ?
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.

JP1974
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 4:46 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#62 Post by JP1974 »

jules wrote:your rate of very seems really better than the one of yes, but i think one in a million is the weakest track on very, being too simple in his melody, though being up tempo.

I wonder if the melody on yes are as good as the one we can find on fundamental, and if the sounds are futuristic as was very at the time ?
Well, Yes is certainly the most contemporary sounding and upbeat PSB opus since Very, and they've eschewed a fair bit of the lush landscapes of Fundy for a more up to date direction, but I don't think futuristic (in the manner of Can you forgive her? or ADPOV, say) is so appropriate here, more of its time with nods to the Pet's past, particularly the 90s albums. I love One In A Million, but if you find the melody too simple then perhaps you'll rate some of the uptempo tracks on Yes - virtually all the tracks are certainly more complex than OIAM, but there's more of a clubby disco production a' la Nightlife than the megapop of Very.

FWIW, I rate Very so highly because it was, for me, the last truly stunning album from a period where my PSB fandom was at its highest - 1990 - 1993.
Ghost within this house wrote:I'm really surprised to hear that there are some badly misjudged & naff lyrics... are these excusable in any way in the context of each song? I mean, if you'd told me the 'considered tacky.... Issey Miyake' lyric before I'd hear Flamboyant, I'd have thought that was naff, but in the context of the song it acts as a kind of summing up of the pretensions that song is about.

Are the lines that have made you cringe on Yes excusable in a similar way?

Or are they fat-lecherous-dad-tries-joke-to-impress-teenage-daughter's-friends cringeworthy?

PJ said there were some 'Finland Station' moments on Yes, but that the lyrics were generally clever without being pretentious....
Legacy is pretentious in every overblown sense, though I just know that some of the Carphone cad lyrics will be dismissed by Neil as one of their "funny, silly" moments like the U2 cover or Ab Fab. Nuff said. Thing is, the Flamboyant couplet was funny because you already knew the song was a satire.

Having said that, I think BAW's whole "protection/detention" refrain and the lyrics that surround it are so hilariously bad, particularly in their delivery, that I can't believe they're being serious. Politics and comedy don't mix after all. Just ask Ben Elton.
Flaffer wrote:which of the tracks would you rate above China and Dirty Tricks ?
Wait till the end of March and you can judge that for yourself.
Last edited by JP1974 on Thu 22 Jan 2009, 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Flaffer
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed 05 Nov 2003, 4:14 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#63 Post by Flaffer »

ah marvellous, you can never have too many bonus tracks. Any remixes of Love Etc ?
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.

DazzerUKUK
Posts: 1071
Joined: Thu 20 Nov 2003, 7:34 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#64 Post by DazzerUKUK »

Have to agree with JP on the hilariously bad lyrics on BAW. A group of four of us listened to the album and we all burst out laughing at Neil and Chris's delivery. Unfortunately however I think they were being serious. It has none of the tongue in cheek delivery of 'I Want a Dog' or authority of Integral.

We endured Legacy for one listen and then on the repeat play of the album later it was turned off after 37 unbearable seconds....at least all the other tracks got played twice all the way through!
And you say you never believed in luck

JP1974
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 4:46 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#65 Post by JP1974 »

Flaffer wrote:ah marvellous, you can never have too many bonus tracks.
Oh, you mean you didn't get China and Dirty Tricks in 2007? :shock:

User avatar
Flaffer
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed 05 Nov 2003, 4:14 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#66 Post by Flaffer »

no, I never received the unreleased Integral remixes either. suppose you gotta be a 'big' enough dj or a 'boy' in the loop
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#67 Post by patrick »

Flaffer wrote:no, I never received the unreleased Integral remixes either. suppose you gotta be a 'big' enough dj or a 'boy' in the loop
He's yanking your chain. They never came out.

User avatar
Flaffer
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed 05 Nov 2003, 4:14 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#68 Post by Flaffer »

Oh no, he quoted lyrics and everything :wink:
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.

User avatar
JSDOUVRES
Posts: 2813
Joined: Fri 05 Dec 2003, 1:31 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#69 Post by JSDOUVRES »

Flaffer wrote:no, I never received the unreleased Integral remixes either. suppose you gotta be a 'big' enough dj or a 'boy' in the loop
Yeah but do these really exist? Be carefull who you believe....

User avatar
BecciJ
Posts: 764
Joined: Sat 02 Jun 2007, 9:21 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#70 Post by BecciJ »

Somethings in this thread just make me think of these guys...

Image

:lol: :lol:

17days
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue 21 Mar 2006, 1:34 am

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#71 Post by 17days »

lyrics to LOVE, ETC. (as fas I can tell)

you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more

well it's tough getting on in the world
when the sun doesn't shine
and a boy needs a girl

its about getting out of a rut
you need luck
but you're stuck and you don't know how...

OH!

(don't have to be)
a big bucks hollywood star
(don't have to drive)
a super car to go far
(don't have to live)
a life of power and wealth
(don't have to be)
beautiful but it helps
(don't have to buy)
a house in beverly hills
(don't have to have)
your daddy paying the bills
(don't have to live)
a life of power and wealth
(don't have to be)
beautiful but it helps

you need more...
than a big blank check to be a lover, or
a gulf stream jet to fly you door to door
somewhere chic on another shore
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need love.

you need love.

you need love.

too much of anything is never enough
too much of everything is never enough

well it's tough getting on in the world
when the sun doesn't shine
and a boy needs a girl

its about getting out of a rut
you need luck
but you're stuck and you don't know how...

OH!

(don't have to be)
a big bucks hollywood star
(don't have to drive)
a super car to get far
(don't have to wear)
a smile much colder than ice
(don't have to be)
beautiful, but its nice

you need more
than the...????? hangin' on the wall
a chauffeur driven limousine encore
to drive your wife and lover to a ??? ball
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need more
you need love.

i believe that we can achieve the love that we need
i believe...
call me naive, but love is for free

(don't have to be)
a big bucks hollywood star
(don't have to drive)
a super car to go far
(don't have to live)
a life of power and wealth
(don't have to be)
beautiful but it helps

beautiful but it helps
beautiful but it helps

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9952
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#72 Post by Patrick Bateman »

That'll be cheque, actually. :wink:

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#73 Post by Lleonard Pler »

Thanks for that, 17days!

User avatar
glennjridge
Posts: 8205
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#74 Post by glennjridge »

I wonder if people really love very as much they think they do or if its kinda like how time makes what was a good memory seem more awesome because of the haze of time.

I mean honestly to me at least all the greatness is pretty much all in a row in the first half of the CD IMO

the rest seems like style over substance.and I'm not sure I ever really liked go west.I rank it right up there with macho man.

User avatar
BecciJ
Posts: 764
Joined: Sat 02 Jun 2007, 9:21 pm

Re: Yes, Pet Shop Boys. (the first forum review) UPDATED

#75 Post by BecciJ »

I've never really been that much into 'Very' to be honest.
*ducks flying missiles*

I love a couple of songs on there, but others I am decidedly 'meh :| ' about.

Post Reply