A new president, a new start for a new millenium.

[fluffmoln]

alig's rants always remind me of this clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA1hyqA6UTY

[patrick]

alig's rants always remind me of this clip

That actually is alig, you know.

[StevePSB]

The same warning as the other political topic about getting personal applies here. If you can't discuss without insults then don't because the thread will be locked if you can't.


StevePSB

[gregf]

Steve,

There is a problem with that : it means anyone can shut down a political discussion
they are losing by initiating personal warfare.

I think that in a political thread, the person initiating personal remarks,
should be .... given a holiday. But the others, should be free to discuss.

-Greg.

(accused here of being fascist, commie, socialist, male chauvinist pig,
and today anti-Semitic, but, still smiling).

[StevePSB]

Sorry Greg, that's the way I work it now. Fed up of countless political threads turning into personal slanging matches, and people never learn.


StevePSB

[Danny C]

Sorry Greg, that's the way I work it now. Fed up of countless political threads turning into personal slanging matches, and people never learn.

No - one person never learns.

If you fail to adequately deal with that solitary troublemaker, then that's hardly our fault, is it?

Now I'm sorry if that seems like a criticism, I'm normally loath to criticise because it's such a gauche thing to do and because I know the admin and mods have a hard job (as well as lives outside this forum), but there's only one individual in these discussions who ever attempts to stifle debate by ranting like a maniac.

[StevePSB]

There isn't always one person, there's nearly always more than that.

I apologise in advance, but I am not going to keep on warning people ad nauseum because as you rightly said, we all have a life outside of the forum and I personally don't wish to spend all day on here keeping an eye on political threads that I *know* as soon as they are created will eventually turn into slanging matches. Enough of my own free time is given over to the forum for many other duties without having to baby sit such predictable political threads at all hours of the day. Besides which, even if I do pick out a troublemaker and warn them individually, I am more often than not ignored, then we're into the territory of 'he/she should be banned' when the insults continue and I'd rather not have to face going down that road more than is absolutely necessary.

If you want to talk politics in here then you might want to air your own feelings of disappointment when the insults start, applying pressure to those who are responsible for spoiling the thread.

To those who do get personal in these threads, just step back for a few seconds and think about it before you rattle off an insulting reply - you will be responsible for the locking of the thread and your fellow users who are posting responsibly are the ones who suffer.

Thank you.


StevePSB

[alig]

Democrats deyning in congress there is a problem with the banks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi ... re=related

Democrats forcing banks to make bad loans:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64&NR=1

[Fugitive1979]

Alig denying that the Republicunts are a bunch of muppets:
The start of this thread

And here also:
U.S. Presidential Elections thread

Tomorrow, Alig will be denying the Holocaust, and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[alig]

Alig deniying that the Republicunts are a bunch of muppets:
The start of this thread

And here also:
U.S. Presidential Elections thread

Tomorrow, Alig will be denying the Holocaust, and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Why would I deny them? You socialists caused the Holocaust. Hitler called his party "German national socialist worker's party." Hitler despised capitalism as much as Marx and Stalin. Capitalism is about decentralization that prevents totalitarianism but socialism is all about centralized control of means of production and thus power. So yes, I wouldn't be surpised if you denied the Holocaust.

[DJ_Couture]

Do you think there might be something to be said for not being quite so partisan?

[Fugitive1979]

Why would I deny them? You socialists caused the Holocaust. Hitler called his party "German national socialist worker's party." Hitler despised capitalism as much as Marx and Stalin. Capitalism is about decentralization that prevents totalitarianism but socialism is all about centralized control of means of production and thus power. So yes, I wouldn't be surpised if you denied the Holocaust.

I'm not a socialist. VERY far from it, in fact. I vote Conservative and consider myself quite right-wing in a British political sense.

[raggatwin]

National Socialism is about 'in groups' and 'out groups', the people as oppossed to the others, members of the in group are tied together by so called imagined 'blood lines' - e'g 'Nordicist band Blood and Honour. True socialism is about the emanciapation of the Intertnational working class where it is your relationship to the means of production - exploiter and exploited. True socialists can see a commonality between their conditions in Newcastle, England for example and those conidtions faced by Peruvian coffee pickers and do not seek to explain their problems away by demonising what they consider to be external groups such as the Jews in Nazi Germany or immigrants and trade unionists in Thatcher's Britain.....but you know this already Ali

[gregf]

Hitler added the "socialist" part just as a trick to get the working class vote.

He hated socialists, very similarly to you Ali.