Disco 4 OS news & tracklisting & NO Integral single

Message

Riikka · #106 Post by **Riikka** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 10:13 pm

Janet Street-Porter wrote:
Pertan wrote:Even worse than Disco2
I don't think that's scientifically possible.

Pet Shop Girl · #107 Post by **Pet Shop Girl** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 10:26 pm

I did not think anything could be worse from them than Disco 2! What is the meaning of it? I just do not understand.

Riikka · #108 Post by **Riikka** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 10:27 pm

Paddymacall wrote:
There were catalog numbers for Integral because, presumably, at one point a release was a real possibility. That also accounts for why a video is being made, I suspect, though nowadays it doesn't seem so unusual to have videos made for "singles" that aren't commercially available.
I wonder why they declined about making Integral a single, it ticks all the boxes of being a hit single, and about the video thing, thats the first i heard about making a video for youtube?!

Yes. I'm getting really angry now. Integral for single!!!

Lleonard Pler · #109 Post by **Lleonard Pler** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 10:41 pm

Well. It would have been better if they had released a 2CD compilation: their remixes for others in CD1, and their remixes of their own tracks in CD2. Or if they had included rare edits/versions of the remixes, instead of the standard ones. But it will be a nice addition anyway.

transforce · #110 Post by **transforce** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 10:41 pm

I was listening to Disco 3 yesterday and as always it sounds excellent.
Disco 4 - sigh. Although all of the songs are good, what IS the point. Nothing new, why bother. That mix of Integral had better be VERY good. Even one new song would have made it a bit more worthwhile.

homer1972 · #111 Post by **homer1972** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:13 pm

Oh Dear!

Radiophonic · #112 Post by **Radiophonic** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:18 pm

I really don't want Yoko Oh No in my collection...

Janet Street-Porter · Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:27 pm

homer1972 wrote:Oh Dear!

Still better than Union Street though.

homer1972 · #114 Post by **homer1972** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:28 pm

Seems the general disdain towards this album is spreading.

http://www.popjustice.com/index.php?opt ... pic=6254.0

Frequency · #115 Post by **Frequency** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:36 pm

I say we all e-mail the official site commending them on the tracklisting for the bonus CD to Disco 4 but point out that the news item omitted the tracklisting to the main CD, which, of course, is the one we're all really waiting on.

homer1972 · #116 Post by **homer1972** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:39 pm

Janet Street-Porter wrote:
homer1972 wrote:Oh Dear!

Still better than Union Street though.

Janet, ANYTHING is better than Union Street.

Frequency · #117 Post by **Frequency** » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:41 pm

At least Union Street had comedy artwork.

Janet Street-Porter · Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:50 pm

Frequency wrote:At least Union Street had comedy artwork.

That's true but here's hoping that Neil and Chris have got a crackhead to draw them for this album too.

Debussy · #119 Post by **Debussy** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 12:35 am

What a backlash! I too, think they have seriously misjudged this one and given that surely a large volume of physical sales are from the fan base, this is shaping up to be a disaster. We are all probably too close to their career to make sound release judgements (thats the record companies job?) but shit...who will buy this?
Fans of the remixed artists would surely have these?

I've got all of these mixes except for Integral and wont be buying it despite being big fan.The only saving grace will be if the Intregral extended mix is a 10+ minute Trevor Horn affair (like the old FGTH extended versions).

Not the result I was expecting either.

Young Offender · Tue 07 Aug 2007, 12:53 am

I know they just got a new contract but Will we/us fans be closing the lid on the coffin?

Not quit the final nail but closing the lid?