The CLASSICAL PSB order?
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
- Janet Street-Porter
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed 14 Jan 2004, 12:32 am
For precisely the same reason he starts pointless and banal threads. Call it karma.glennjridge wrote:as I read all this, I am trying to work out why the same posters complain about nicknames posts, yet continually trail behind him like a deranged hostile conga line wherever he goes.
I don't have a problem with anybody posting crap on here - feel free to celebrate New York City Boy as one of the Twentieth Century's finest compositions if you like but if you are going to start speculative thread upon speculative thread about songs NOBODY* has heard yet, then expect some kind of response. That's free speech, n'est-ce pas?
*apart from Neil, Chris, Trevor Horn, Popjustice, etc
Last edited by Janet Street-Porter on Fri 13 Jan 2006, 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
- Janet Street-Porter
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed 14 Jan 2004, 12:32 am
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
- joncool5
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:15 am
- Contact:
-
Nickname
- Posts: 7889
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm
Janet Street-Porter wrote:BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!nickname wrote:Maybe my posts are ridiculous, but the MOST RIDICULOUS THING I can do is giving up to express my opinion because some people don't like it.
Apart from that, I think PSB (and maybe EMI) like to put the songs in a correct order (according the quality of the songs and other things) and I don't believe it's a bad thing to think why they choose this order.
- Ghost within this house
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Mr Janet was simply suggesting what we all know to be the true: it is not possible to have a useful opinion on things that are unknown. Nevertheless, as you yourself mentioned, this is a jolly fun game to keep us all busy in the long cold weeks before F is released.nickname wrote:Janet Street-Porter wrote:BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!nickname wrote:Maybe my posts are ridiculous, but the MOST RIDICULOUS THING I can do is giving up to express my opinion because some people don't like it.
Apart from that, I think PSB (and maybe EMI) like to put the songs in a correct order (according the quality of the songs and other things) and I don't believe it's a bad thing to think why they choose this order.We know what kind of person you are now, what are you going to do now threaten me in public?.
Keep coming up with the goods, I say!
Firing verbal shots.......like a Tommy Gun
-
Nickname
- Posts: 7889
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm
I think the same about her (and about you) if you ask me, but I think the community hasn't been created to insult other people (I see some of you don't agree with that).Ghost within this house wrote:Mr Janet was simply suggesting what we all know to be the true: it is not possible to have a useful opinion on things that are unknown. Nevertheless, as you yourself mentioned, this is a jolly fun game to keep us all busy in the long cold weeks before F is released.nickname wrote:Janet Street-Porter wrote: BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!We know what kind of person you are now, what are you going to do now threaten me in public?.
Keep coming up with the goods, I say!
-
Nickname
- Posts: 7889
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm
Thank you westendboy87, I love this sentence:westendboy87 wrote:Why can't everyone just respect what everyone else has to say? He did nothing wrong. If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them. The poor guy (or girl) got attacked by all these people at once. I'd be pretty upset if I were him
"If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them"
It sounds easy, you don't need to read my post if you don't like them. But for some people is IMPOSSIBLE. They are not able to do that although it is as easy as it sounds.
Yes, I feel really upset. I don't know what kind of things try to achieve with their insults.
- Ghost within this house
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
I'm sorry you're upset, but being upset doesn't seem to have dampened your ardour for endless speculation. Let's try and find a middle way: it would be great if people who didn't want to read your posts could simply avoid them. However, at the moment, that would only be possible by not opening ANY threads, and therefore by NOT VISITING the forum at all!!nickname wrote:
It sounds easy, you don't need to read my post if you don't like them. But for some people is IMPOSSIBLE.
If you could try to be more selective, or focus all your speculations into a smaller number of threads, then I think (a) you could continue speculating uninterrupted and (b) you would receive less abuse.
Firing verbal shots.......like a Tommy Gun
- popfreak
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Sat 08 Feb 2003, 3:45 pm
nickname perhaps make the your thread titles clearer so we don't have to open them up.
because titles like "The question is....." implies you want as many people (friends or enemies) to read it.
Just keep things simple and maybe all in one special nickname thread.
I don't think people are out to get you, its just you need to relax a bit and think before you post.
because titles like "The question is....." implies you want as many people (friends or enemies) to read it.
Just keep things simple and maybe all in one special nickname thread.
I don't think people are out to get you, its just you need to relax a bit and think before you post.
- Very
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2004, 12:50 pm
- ArseSpanker
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Tue 10 May 2005, 1:28 pm
-
One of the crowd
- Posts: 4796
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm