Awful Tower of London review

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
Nickname
Posts: 7892
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm

Re: Awful Tower of London review

#16 Post by Nickname »

Burj wrote:
nickname wrote:who knows.
Least of all you, eh?

How much are your 'girlfriends' rates these days? An hourly rate?
My English is so bad, I can't understand you. :lol:

bookshopboy

#17 Post by bookshopboy »

The review featured in the Independent on Sunday, which also included a list of the 101 most importants gays and lesbians in the UK...

Neil Tennant was there too.

Burj

#18 Post by Burj »

SP was Melody Maker's most vociferous promoter of all things Romo a few years back. Nuff said.

Burj

Re: Awful Tower of London review

#19 Post by Burj »

nickname wrote:
Burj wrote:
nickname wrote:who knows.
Least of all you, eh?

How much are your 'girlfriends' rates these days? An hourly rate?
My English is so bad, I can't understand you. :lol:
As long as they kiss, that's the main thing.

User avatar
!
Posts: 2327
Joined: Mon 23 Jan 2006, 7:13 pm

Re: Awful Tower of London review

#20 Post by ! »

nickname wrote:
Burj wrote:
nickname wrote:who knows.
Least of all you, eh?

How much are your 'girlfriends' rates these days? An hourly rate?
My English is so bad, I can't understand you. :lol:
He's saying your girlfriends were/are hookers. :wink:

User avatar
Janet Street-Porter
Posts: 2530
Joined: Wed 14 Jan 2004, 12:32 am

#21 Post by Janet Street-Porter »

Simon Price is fantastic - he has always loved PSB.

Burj

#22 Post by Burj »

Janet Street-Porter wrote:Simon Price is fantastic - he has always loved PSB.
Yes, and synth/poofy pop in general. :)

User avatar
ArseSpanker
Posts: 637
Joined: Tue 10 May 2005, 1:28 pm

Re: Awful Tower of London review

#23 Post by ArseSpanker »

nickname wrote:My girlfriend and ex-girlfriends don't think the same but who knows.
Same here, it's causing me an awful lot of grief. Sorry, I mean ex-girlfriend. I'm disagree.

Hey! I love Simon Price as much as I love nickname and I recognise what he's saying, as, I suspect, would Neil. He's just saying represssion suited them, not commenting about homosexuality. It's also not a bad review.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect or represent those of its author.

User avatar
Danny C
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 12:19 am

#24 Post by Danny C »

I read the review and I thought I recognised the simpering studenty smugness of it as it dripped off the screen.

Simon Price is utterly f*cking useless and I have no idea how he is able to get such plum reviewing and interviewing jobs.

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

#25 Post by Drico One »

This thread sums up the abject gormlessness that has swamped this forum in recent months. A perfectly thoughtful and well argued point, spliced with a little eye-catching controversy, and the poof police are out to scream from the rooftops.

Then again, it's been a long time since erudition counted for much around here.

An excellent review lost on the usual suspects. Having been at the Liverpool show on Sunday, I was left feeling a little queasy by the celebratory nature of the event. While the dynamic duo deserve to be embraced with genuine love, much of their impact is invested in slightly cool understatement. The current show eschews that for a party approach that, while enjoyable, divests the emotional highs of their impact. It's all one big funfair. To my mind at least, they've always been about a little more than mere fun.

Simon Price makes a similar point in an eyecatching manner. His review is far more prescient than some wish to accept.

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

Burj

#26 Post by Burj »

Have you not seen the video of Discovery? :roll:

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

#27 Post by Drico One »

Of course. And your point is?

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

Burj

#28 Post by Burj »

Erm, well obviously the 'party approach' has been done before. Even Neil referred to Discovery as 'cheap and cheerful sh1t entertainment' a few years back. There was very little that was cool about it.
Last edited by Burj on Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

#29 Post by Drico One »

Burj wrote:Erm, well obviously the 'party approach' has been done before. Even Neil referred to Discovery as 'cheap and cheerful sh1t entertainment' a few years back. There was very little that was cool about it.
And what exactly has the fact that it has been done before got to do with the simple point that the celebratory approach can take the edge off much of their impact?

Price suggested the loss of subtlety in such a tack is something to bemoan. In my view, he's entirely correct. Whether it was lost in Brazil 12 years ago is really quite irrelevant.

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

Burj

#30 Post by Burj »

Drico One wrote:Price suggested the loss of subtlety in such a tack is something to bemoan. In my view, he's entirely correct. Whether it was lost in Brazil 12 years ago is really quite irrelevant.

Drico.
Well you said that "To my mind at least, they've always been about a little more than mere fun." But I think you can safely say that since 1993 there's been a lot more 'fun' and a lot less 'cool'. Well maybe not Release, ahem.

I'm not saying that's a good thing, but I just wanted to point out to you that the 'party approach' of the new show that made you so ever so slightly queasy is not new, so you should have had a rough idea of what to expect. No point hankering after the long-gone glory days of the past. PSB have changed whether we like it or not.

Post Reply