DNA magazine? Does this make me homophobic....

Message

Technotrancemix · #16 Post by **Technotrancemix** » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 8:44 pm

I have the courage to pic up Attitude & Gay Times in WHSmith, only to look for PSB articles, not to see Bigboy's new movie review

Madge · #17 Post by **Madge** » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 10:03 pm

Do you like any of my movie's? I am quite big too.

Technotrancemix · Thu 13 Jul 2006, 11:35 pm

Never seen your movies unless they were with Harold Bishop

Burj · #19 Post by **Burj** » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 11:46 pm

I've always had a penchant for bashing the Bishop. Did you see him finger my muddy ring in the lake?

Technotrancemix · Thu 13 Jul 2006, 11:49 pm

Burj wrote:I've always had a penchant for bashing the Bishop. Did you never see him with my muddy ring in the lake?

Nah, normally with Lou Carpenter on Ramsy Street

transforce · #21 Post by **transforce** » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 11:51 pm

I wouldn't read it in the shop either. I wouldn't want anyone to think I was actively looking at a gay mag. I might see a willy or something, ugh.
Scans on the Internet I would look at (as long as there were no willies

).

VinnyM27 · #22 Post by **VinnyM27** » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 3:20 am

psb-freak wrote:You can´t be homophobic if you like PSB.
Any scans, btw ?

And I like Donna Summer better than I like PSB. I've always been a big defender of gay rights but buying a gay magazine? Maybe something like the Advocate but this thing looked like it was the gay male verison of Maxim or FHM.

VinnyM27 · #23 Post by **VinnyM27** » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 3:23 am

transforce wrote:I wouldn't read it in the shop either. I wouldn't want anyone to think I was actively looking at a gay mag. I might see a willy or something, ugh.
Scans on the Internet I would look at (as long as there were no willies ).

Well a magazine like this probably would have a willie or two being nearly exposed....

glennjridge · #24 Post by **glennjridge** » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 4:26 am

I would be far more embarresed being caught reading a magazine like "walking" than a gay one.the cover is usually two 50ish looking people wearing spandex walking down some country trail smiling at each other.

they have a magazine for freakin everything.

Darkmoon · #25 Post by **Darkmoon** » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 3:28 pm

bookshopboy wrote:I'm gay and I find it embarrassing buying gay magazines because they are shit.

Then why do you buy them?

Technotrancemix · #26 Post by **Technotrancemix** » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 8:56 pm

I've got all the Loaded, FHM, Front, Zoo, Nuts etc issues from when I went to college till a year or so ago and cos WHSmith let me read them in thier shop, I have no need to purchase hem anymore.

My old mags are in mint condition and unlike 99% of other men's magaziines, mine ain't stuck together so they should be worth a bit

Janet Street-Porter · Fri 14 Jul 2006, 8:59 pm

glennjridge wrote:I would be far more embarresed being caught reading a magazine like "walking" than a gay one.the cover is usually two 50ish looking people wearing spandex walking down some country trail smiling at each other.

What about the gay walking periodical, Back Lanes?

transforce · #28 Post by **transforce** » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 11:33 pm

I misread 'walking'

Syncratic · #29 Post by **Syncratic** » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 2:33 am

glennjridge wrote:I would be far more embarresed being caught reading a magazine like "walking" than a gay one.the cover is usually two 50ish looking people wearing spandex walking down some country trail smiling at each other.

they have a magazine for freakin everything.

That must be Erasure's Private (R)Ear magazine. Does that make you homophobic? Ask Shelton?

ArseSpanker · #30 Post by **ArseSpanker** » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 1:35 pm

Technotrancemix wrote:I've got all the Loaded, FHM, Front, Zoo, Nuts etc issues from when I went to college till a year or so ago and cos WHSmith let me read them in thier shop, I have no need to purchase hem anymore.

My old mags are in mint condition and unlike 99% of other men's magaziines, mine ain't stuck together so they should be worth a bit

Am I right in saying that anything that has been fingered (so to speak. Boom boom!) cannot actually be in 'mint' condition? Wouldn't they be 'near mint' at best? Unless you haven't touched your hi-brow literary supplements and just put them straight into a sealed bag, of course.