gregf wrote:One of the most famous UFO sightings in the 60s was filmed from a train.
The object hovers for some time then shoots off at fantastic speed.
The film is analysed and the object is calculated to accelerate to 1000s miles per hour.
Everyone gets very excited.
Then someone else saw the same object, from the same train.
Oh dear, it was all a reflection.
UFOlogy was never the same.
it just doesnt look like part of the same reflection to me...i dont want to sound like a nutter, i just dont think it looks like part of the inside of the train reflecting....the lighting, transparency and surface of the object does not match the rest of the 'reflecting parts'....to me, it definitely looks exterior to the train! the opacity of the object is not the same as the 'reflecting parts'!!....it is clearly 'Unidentified'.
if you look at the image below you will see that i took the photo into Adobe Photoshop and added an 'emboss' filter which extrudes and shows 3d objects by bringing them out of the picture. as you can see, the object matches all the other 3d objects in the image, ie the buildings and the hills, the shadows are the same thus showing it is a solid object. if you look at the 'reflecting parts' ie the windows, you will notice that they are not 'standing off the background, coming away from the background but the opposite is happening, all the 'reflecting parts' are in fact recessed into the image. if the object was part of the same reflection then the shadows and performance of the object would match those of the reflection. this is how UFO magazine used to determine 3d objects in photos!
just my opinion guys but it just doesnt match the reflecting parts! i'm not saying its aliens i'm saying its an Unidentified Flying Object. Maybe its the Moon, maybe its Venus, maybe its a bird but it IS clearly part of the actual scenery in the photo.
