Afraid not. All paedophiles deserve to be hung. What sick bastard does stuff like this?
That said, hopefully this isn't any thing to do with paedophilia.
If that guy who has been questioned is as innocent as he says he is, i also think it's a disgrace that the police should be naming someone who has nothing whatsoever to do with the case.
Undertaker wrote:
If that guy who has been questioned is as innocent as he says he is, i also think it's a disgrace that the police should be naming someone who has nothing whatsoever to do with the case.
Dave
From what I've understood, the guy has been named by the media and not the police. Actually it was the journalists who reported the guy as suspicious to the police, since he had been so eagerly mingling with the reporting journalists offering his help. In a case like this it's nearly impossible to keep it a secret, if police takes somebody in for questioning and searches his home.
Undertaker wrote:Afraid not. All paedophiles deserve to be hung. What sick bastard does stuff like this?
That said, hopefully this isn't any thing to do with paedophilia.
Leaving aside the quite ludicrous idea that the state should kill someone as punishment for a mere sex crime, you've just changed your mind here. Are we executing the "bastard" responsible for taking her, as you originally said, or are we only hanging him now if he sexually assaults her?
I think it is time to provide little children with a chip or an emitter. At this very moment little children, at some places in the world, are abducted and locked up in a cellar. We cannot accept that any longer.
Dreaming of the Queen
visiting for tea
You and her and I
and Lady Di
Undertaker wrote:Afraid not. All paedophiles deserve to be hung. What sick bastard does stuff like this?
That said, hopefully this isn't any thing to do with paedophilia.
Leaving aside the quite ludicrous idea that the state should kill someone as punishment for a mere sex crime, you've just changed your mind here. Are we executing the "bastard" responsible for taking her, as you originally said, or are we only hanging him now if he sexually assaults her?
"mere sex crime?" forgetting what punishment is just, thats a pretty flippant way to talk about the rape of a child.
see when I read things like that I dont think, theres danny, rational down to earth guy, I think, heres a guy who is just going to follow his "opposite viewpoint guy" agenda down straight to the depths just to continue an argument.cause its not the kind of statement someone who has a normal mind makes.
I can tell you I think if someone rapes a child thats outside a mere sex crime and on some whole other level of brutality.
glennjridge wrote:"mere sex crime?" forgetting what punishment is just, thats a pretty flippant way to talk about the rape of a child.
see when I read things like that I dont think, theres danny, rational down to earth guy, I think, heres a guy who is just going to follow his "opposite viewpoint guy" agenda down straight to the depths just to continue an argument.cause its not the kind of statement someone who has a normal mind makes.
I can tell you I think if someone rapes a child thats outside a mere sex crime and on some whole other level of brutality.
A child sex offender is a person who is mentally ill. I don't think executing people for being sick is ever a good idea. You can try and spin that out as me taking a position just to be contrary, but I think my justification for it is pretty solid.
You can talk about "normal minds" but I don't think killing sick people is normal or correct, so stick that up your c*nt.
Incidentally, I also draw a distinction between paedophiles, not all of whom act on their desires, and child sex offenders. I don't think people who are sexually attracted to children are "evil" unless they act on those desires, any more than a person who fantasises about rough sex is as bad as a genuine rapist.
Last edited by Danny C on Wed 16 May 2007, 11:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
diana wrote:I think it is time to provide little children with a chip or an emitter. At this very moment little children, at some places in the world, are abducted and locked up in a cellar. We cannot accept that any longer.
How much would such a system cost? I guarantee the money spent would save about 1000 times as many lives if it was spent on helping those children born into poverty rather than paranoid and illiberal false-security measures.
branding a child rapist "mentally ill" is apologist nonsense.....lawyer talk simply meant to downgrade the heinous crimes of raping a kid.
everyone who does any crime in america blames it on some jackassed mental or social issue.
I'm not even talking about people who keep their perverted kinks bottled up.I have no view on them.
but if you rape a child you are on a whole other level of evil or "mere" sex crime.
diana wrote:I think it is time to provide little children with a chip or an emitter. At this very moment little children, at some places in the world, are abducted and locked up in a cellar. We cannot accept that any longer.
How much would such a system cost? I guarantee the money spent would save about 1000 times as many lives if it was spent on helping those children born into poverty rather than paranoid and illiberal false-security measures.
is this what it comes down to? gee honey I would rather be sure our kid is safe, but those cute little hungry african kids in the TV commercials need rice.
nobody breaks down their own lives like that. you think about your own children first before you try and save the world.
its not disgusting its human nature. you dont think parents think of their own children first? you may have been raised by timber wolves but most of us humanoids were raised with parents who fed us before other nations children.
I dont concede you have points because I'm starting to think your posts are all engineered by the script writers of south park as they are so obviously tasteless and come off as a joke.
glennjridge wrote:branding a child rapist "mentally ill" is apologist nonsense.....lawyer talk simply meant to downgrade the heinous crimes of raping a kid.
everyone who does any crime in america blames it on some jackassed mental or social issue.
I'm not even talking about people who keep their perverted kinks bottled up.I have no view on them.
but if you rape a child you are on a whole other level of evil or "mere" sex crime.
It's not just America that try and bullsh*t you and make excuses for nonces. Infact, over here they try and make excuses for most crimes. They even send people on cruises as rehabilitation. Poor upbringings yadda,yadda,yadda.
'A mere sex crime' is a shocking way to describe paedophiles. Those responsible don't deserve to breathe the same air as the rest of us.
There were two incidents in Britain last year that stand out. One was a young child being taken out of her own bath by some freak show that sneaked into her house. He sexually assaulted here and then let her go, alone, in the middle of nowhere.
Another was where a man and a women raped a 12 month old baby for a laugh. Sorry, but these are not 'mere sex crimes'. I don't think anyone could imagine a more repulsive act of butality.
