CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS

Message

homer1972 · #1 Post by **homer1972** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm

http://www.erasureforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=11329

Looks like a fantastic show

dVTB · #2 Post by **dVTB** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 1:42 pm

Jeez, why can't you just post your Erasure spam in a central or existing Erasure topic? This is NOT an Erasure forum, nor a combined PSb-Erasure-Whatever Forum.

PLEASE let somebody start CENTRAL topics for Erasure, Depeche Mode, etc.

Radiophonic · #3 Post by **Radiophonic** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 1:50 pm

I agree with dvTB.

Undertaker · #4 Post by **Undertaker** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 2:02 pm

I'll third that.

Dave

homer1972 · #5 Post by **homer1972** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 3:52 pm

I'll fourth that

By the way Dave, you just made a complete idiot of yourself yet again, seen as you started an Erasure topic as well thus contradicting yourself.

Homer.

homer1972 · #6 Post by **homer1972** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 3:53 pm

dVTB wrote:Jeez, why can't you just post your Erasure spam in a central or existing Erasure topic? This is NOT an Erasure forum, nor a combined PSb-Erasure-Whatever Forum.

PLEASE let somebody start CENTRAL topics for Erasure, Depeche Mode, etc.

I would but the last thread got closed if you look because of some silly members

This is the off topic forum is it not? So i would not call it spam

Matter of opinion i know!!
Have changed topic title to appease some members, hope it passes muster.

Radiophonic · #7 Post by **Radiophonic** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:14 pm

I see a pattern forming that when 'innocent' Erasure topics are made they degenerate into chaos.

It makes me curious why Erasure subjects are raised - to inform Pet Shop Boys Forum members or to incite them. Interesting....

homer1972 · #8 Post by **homer1972** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:15 pm

Inform but the same people cant accept people like both bands so not so much interesting more simple deduction........

Janet Street-Porter · Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:38 pm

You have been banned from this forum for mentioning labia.
Please contact the webmaster or board administrator for more information.

Undertaker · #10 Post by **Undertaker** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:42 pm

homer, dimon, teddie, kev, or whatever other names you frequent forums with wrote:I'll fourth that
By the way Dave, you just made a complete idiot of yourself yet again, seen as you started an Erasure topic as well thus contradicting yourself.

Homer.

So by saying that your ''fourth that'' you are agreeing with us all in this very thread, yet you same i'm contradictory

You are simply not wanted here. You have made several personal attacks and have already called me an idiot in this thread.

Radiophonic has it right. You start these threads up to start a slanging match. I don't know why though because even after your derogatory comments in other threads, established members here still wipe the floor with you.

Feel free to come back with more insults, not that you need much encouragement.

dVTB · #11 Post by **dVTB** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:45 pm

In my humble opinion, topics shouldn't be closed. If people post unacceptable messages, moderators need to delete or edit such posts. If people behave normal, it's easy to keep a central Erasure topic open and filled with new information for people who are interested in Erasure.

Thanks for renaming this topic. Let's hope it can be open for a long time.

Undertaker · #12 Post by **Undertaker** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:46 pm

homer1972 wrote:Inform but the same people cant accept people like both bands so not so much interesting more simple deduction........

Do you do this for a hobby, or is it sponsored bullsh*t?

There are plenty of us here that have Erasure stuff but tend to slag off their more recent work.We all have a right to express such an opinion. Still, slagging off Erasure doesn't give you the right, or your few sidekicks to come on here and start personally attacking members and trying in vain to be moderators. You end up looking stupid.

Dave

homer1972 · #13 Post by **homer1972** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:48 pm

dVTB wrote:In my humble opinion, topics shouldn't be closed. If people post unacceptable messages, moderators need to delete or edit such posts. If people behave normal, it's easy to keep a central Erasure topic open and filled with new information for people who are interested in Erasure.

Thanks for renaming this topic. Let's hope it can be open for a long time.

No problems dvTB.

homer1972 · #14 Post by **homer1972** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 4:53 pm

Undertaker wrote:
homer1972 wrote:Inform but the same people cant accept people like both bands so not so much interesting more simple deduction........
Do you do this for a hobby, or is it sponsored bullsh*t?

There are plenty of us here that have Erasure stuff but tend to slag off their more recent work.We all have a right to express such an opinion. Still, slagging off Erasure doesn't give you the right, or your few sidekicks to come on here and start personally attacking members and trying in vain to be moderators. You end up looking stupid.

Dave

Gosh Dave, I really hope to have a sensible discussion with you sometime without your need to resort to profanities to get your point of view across.
As you have made personal attacks on myself Dave, you have once again contradicted yourself.

P.S. I think the irony and sarcasm in my post (I'll fourth that

) was somewhat lost on you.

Undertaker · #15 Post by **Undertaker** » Sun 08 Jul 2007, 5:18 pm

homer1972 wrote:[

P.S. I think the irony and sarcasm in my post (I'll fourth that ) was somewhat lost on you.

Your posts tend to have that effect on people. You street team member, you.

Dave