a tumbleweed spins past

[kennym]

lets not lose sight of the fact you researched my background information because we got into an argument over some issue I cant remember now and posted my ISP service information and post history on the net.

LOL, so checking your post history means that I treat my friends with disrespect?

In fact I didn't say one word about you. I said you discuss with yourself, which was PROVEN to be true. Not one untrue word. You just can't deal with the fact that your behaviour was discovered, which is why you try amateur-psychology. You're not the first who tries.

um no I wasnt. when you posted my ISP information,and all my various internet screenames, thats not exactly a routine search of back posts.how did you know such and such screenames was mine? your suddenly now being very vague about what you posted. you got mad and you ran a background check and posted it on the net.

in my opinion, the type of mentality that runs background checks on other posters when one gets angry is the same mentality as those types you always hear about on the news who get busted for hiding video cameras in toilet stalls to get some free watersport videos or the landlord that hides cameras in tenants aparments.

I'm not trying to start an argument, you referenced me, I'm just saying you run background checks, thats all.

Yesterday when i was mad..

[glennjridge]

he referenced me early in the thread regarding an incident we both know about, I responded. standard operating procedure.

[Phillip]

HMV have this picture in the artwork box now:

Oh dear.

We have all seen this picture before, but I like it (their nearly smiling)

[dVTB]

when you posted my ISP information,and all my various internet screenames, thats not exactly a routine search of back posts.how did you know such and such screenames was mine?

Simple. They all posted the identical, same crap. And all the names, such as Known12, Very3, Sure1 (or whatever) were all very similar. I did not post any other information than your multiple user names and the fact you were discussing with yourself. I do not have enough computer knowledge to post info such as IP-numbers, providers or other information, nor am I even the slightest bit interested in it.

in my opinion, the type of mentality that runs background checks on other posters when one gets angry is the same mentality as those types you always hear about on the news who get busted for hiding video cameras in toilet stalls to get some free watersport videos or the landlord that hides cameras in tenants aparments.

I'm not trying to start an argument, you referenced me, I'm just saying you run background checks, thats all.

No, you questioned my psychological status and now you put me in one league with people who hide cams in toilets. Hilarious! Trust me: I'm having great fun discussing this Very3-Known12-whatever-issue with you.

I'm hardly doing a background check, I just browse the occasional post history, when I have suspicions. Mostly (and only) when a user is very irritating (category BigBoy), OR attacking me for no reason. For instance 'newbie' Verbal who continuously commented on everything I said. I did some digging, it turned out to be Kirk_Mack in disguise. I also helped the moderators of this forum to unmask several BigBoy aliases. I don't browse all post histories, only when I have suspicions. Sometimes they are wrong, sometimes they are right.

[Janet Street-Porter]

I also helped the moderators of this forum to unmask several BigBoy aliases.

And he'd have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky kid.

[dVTB]

I also helped the moderators of this forum to unmask several BigBoy aliases.

And he'd have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky kid.

Banned members are banned for a reason. And most of the time, he reveals his own alias anyway, because his way of posting is too obvious. Even a 6-year old can recognize it. It's only a matter of time before his next alias is discovered.

[glennjridge]

you didnt like my position on some issue so you decided to investigate my internet history.
we argued here,yet you did a background check on a long dead usenet group. I dont care what level of computer skill it was.not that I believe your (I stumbed upon all your alternate screens version).

I'm just pointing this out next time some of you types get on about governments using technology to look into people's background because they dont like their viewpoints.

some,such as you dv "wire tappin" tb are perfectly willing to slide over to the far right and use these creepy tactics.you are on the same page as these government types.
a snoop. thats your psychological state.

[dVTB]

you didnt like my position on some issue so you decided to investigate my internet history.
we argued here,yet you did a background check on a long dead usenet group. I dont care what level of computer skill it was.not that I believe your (I stumbed upon all your alternate screens version).

I'm just pointing this out next time some of you types get on about governments using technology to look into people's background because they dont like their viewpoints.

some,such as you dv "wire tappin" tb are perfectly willing to slide over to the far right and use these creepy tactics.you are on the same page as these government types.
a snoop. thats your psychological state.

For your information: I did NOT check your posting history because of your (often ridiculous) viewpoints. It's perfectly fine with me that people have different opinions. It's just that your annoying style of posting the same thing several times (for example: constantly comparing Americans and Europeans, as if Europe is one nation) was noticed. Not only by me, also by others.

I'm not disrespecting your privacy. I don't know your real name, don't know where you live, don't know your job, your marital status, your income, your mortage nor the code of your bank card. But you should understand that when you post messages on public forums, you leave traces. It has exactly ZERO to do with government monitoring or government control.

By the way: for American standards, I'm very left-wing liberal. For Dutch standards, I'm somewhere in the middle: social-liberal. To call me right-wing is simply insane, certainly when YOU are the one who says is. Together with homophobic Parkol, you're probably the most conservative person I ever noticed on a PSB forum.

But I have to admit: I love my new nickname: dV wire tappin' TB. Great! So are you ARE warned, in case you consider to post even more crap on this forum.

[glennjridge]

alot of times its counterproductive to argue with you types on the net cause you are missing certain personality traits that are standard on normal people,ie you dont get it when its explained to you.

arguing politics/religion is fine I do it on lots of forums and 99% of the time its simply harmless and it just runs out of steam as people generally are rational.

but there are the 1% of people out there like you who dont know emotionally how to interact with people who disagree with you. theres 2 kinds of people. you either get the type of person who sends death threats...or do what you do, get vindictive and do research on the person.

explaining it to you is pointless cause you dont have the neccesary skills to deal with opposite viewpoints rationally.I dont get vindictive generally. I usually am responding to attacks.

[dVTB]

alot of times its counterproductive to argue with you types on the net cause you are missing certain personality traits that are standard on normal people,ie you dont get it when its explained to you.

arguing politics/religion is fine I do it on lots of forums and 99% of the time its simply harmless and it just runs out of steam as people generally are rational.

but there are the 1% of people out there like you who dont know emotionally how to interact with people who disagree with you. theres 2 kinds of people. you either get the type of person who sends death threats...or do what you do, get vindictive and do research on the person.

explaining it to you is pointless cause you dont have the neccesary skills to deal with opposite viewpoints rationally.I dont get vindictive generally. I usually am responding to attacks.

Are you now talking to ME or to yourself once again? Since you refer to "not getting things when they are explained", and the leak of "skils to deal with opposite viewpoints", I assume it's the latter.

I will not intervene anymore in the heated discussion between you and you.

[glennjridge]

your playing stupid, how a manchild acts when he is being told what he's doing wrong even though he is full grown.you get stupid.

how someone presents themselves on the net is a generally a good indicator of how they are in real life. your a snoop. you dont take it well emotionally when you come across an opposite viewpoint so you are the type that does shady things.

I know you joke about it,but performing background searches isnt something rational guys our age do when we disagree with posters over blah... politics.

[Phillip]

everything has gone very quiet on the Disco 4 front, no promos out, no comment on official site and those supposedly 'in the know' silent, so do people think it is going to happen or was it all wishful thinking on our part?

Sept 24th on 'Sirendisc' site now

[Kris]

how someone presents themselves on the net is a generally a good indicator of how they are in real life.

That's a sweeping generalisation and one I personally disagree with. I'm a member of various fora and in the meet-ups I've attended - whether from this board or others I frequent - I've actually been surprised by how different some people are in the flesh to how I imagined them online.

Consequently, I never judge any posters until I meet them in person. If you met dvtb in real life (I have, incidentally), I'm quite sure you'd have a different opinion of him.

[dVTB]

your playing stupid, how a manchild acts when he is being told what he's doing wrong even though he is full grown.you get stupid.

how someone presents themselves on the net is a generally a good indicator of how they are in real life. your a snoop. you dont take it well emotionally when you come across an opposite viewpoint so you are the type that does shady things.

I know you joke about it,but performing background searches isnt something rational guys our age do when we disagree with posters over blah... politics.

Told you before in this topic and the fact that you ignored it once again, is the ultimate proof: you're ignorant. It's not the content, but your STYLE of posting that's so annoying.

Thanks for your amateur psychology tutorial. Now help yourself, OK? Since you're good at discussing with yourself, I'm sure you can also take care of your own, personal mental help

[dVTB]

how someone presents themselves on the net is a generally a good indicator of how they are in real life.

That's a sweeping generalisation and one I personally disagree with. I'm a member of various fora and in the meet-ups I've attended - whether from this board or others I frequent - I've actually been surprised by how different some people are in the flesh to how I imagined them online.

Consequently, I never judge any posters until I meet them in person. If you met dvtb in real life (I have, incidentally), I'm quite sure you'd have a different opinion of him.

Thanks for your comments. Glennjridge is the master of generalisation, so his comments are hardly surprising. I was just kidding towards Undertaker who quoted himself and *of course* glennjridge was going to react. I'm just having one big laugh, this whole topic.

The funny thing about glennjridge's comment is that he just said about himself that he suffers from the Multi-Personality Syndrome in real life