Why is global warming so bloody cold?

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Message
Author
User avatar
pet shop boy
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri 30 Mar 2007, 4:02 pm

#16 Post by pet shop boy »

dVTB wrote:Besides that, there's this British scientist, mr Piers Corbyn, who has a totally different theory about climate change. Summarized very shortly, the effects are mainly caused by the sun. He predicted a strong winter.

The coming years will be crucial in the climate debate. If the average temperature on earth keeps climbing, the sceptics about global warming, are proven wrong. Mr Corbyn however, predicts that this won't happen. If he's right, there a big bomb under the global warming theory.
Piers correctly predicted the storm on november the 8th, he's also predicted storms for this weekend. He charges £10 for a months knowledge. The bookies buy his knowledge and give odds on what he says. There will NOT be a white xmas.

If Piers told the weather, he'd be the only one ALL OF THE TV STATIONS would need, but they have happy smiley faced people doing that to make you feel good.

Slowly, people are appearing and exposing the fascism of the globalist governments, the only problem is, millions of retards like dannyc are afraid to admit defeat and/or be educated, thus giving governments power to CONTROL.
"Godd" Marco V
Do you believe in a god that satisfies?
Do you believe in a god that opens eyes?
Do you believe in a god that tells you lies?
Or do you believe in me?

Do you believe in a god that brings you down?
Do you believe in a god that wears a crown?
Do you believe in a god that makes you bow?
Or do you believe in me?

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

#17 Post by Undertaker »

pet shop boy wrote: Piers correctly predicted the storm on november the 8th, he's also predicted storms for this weekend. He charges £10 for a months knowledge. The bookies buy his knowledge and give odds on what he says. There will NOT be a white xmas.

.
Is this post for real? People actually pay someone a tenner a month for weather reports? Are these idiots the same people who throw money into 'wishing wells?' :doh:

So there wont be a white christmas because Piers says so.Thats about as astonishingly correct prediction as stating Christmas will be on the 25th December. We NEVER have a white Christmas. When was the last one exactly? And how many we actually had in the past 50 years?

Anyway, tell me where you live, pay me a fiver (bargain) and i'll tell you the weather for the next 10 days if you want. Infact, i'll do it for free. I'll start by stating that it will be a far colder winter this year and expect a few storms around Christmas. If i'm right, i'm easy setting up my ow weather business. Especially if there are morons out there who will pay me to tell them when it's pi**ing it down.

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#18 Post by dVTB »

Edited.
Last edited by dVTB on Sun 07 Sep 2008, 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

#19 Post by Undertaker »

So did this guy predict the weather for ice skating in each of these years? Or did he take these years and then find a coincidence?

Spurs win the cup when the year ends in one. Well, they are supposed to. 2011 is a few years away, are we all putting a grand on it? ;)

Nobody can correctly predict the weather 100%. They even get it wrong the day before. I'd say most forecasts are 80% fact and 20% guess work. The best evidence of this was the comical balls up the met office made back in 1987 when the legendary Michael Fish said there wasn't a hurricane on the way. Classic t.v.

It's colder than last year at this point and apparently, that points to a worse winter. Thats not really a difficult prediction though, because last years winter was very mild.

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#20 Post by dVTB »

Edited.
Last edited by dVTB on Sun 07 Sep 2008, 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gregf
Posts: 1802
Joined: Fri 08 Dec 2006, 1:58 am
Contact:

#21 Post by gregf »

The fools who are GW sceptics, even tho the evidence is clear allready, are the
very pawns the carbon industries rely on to keep their profits.

They are the real criminals responsible for ruining the earth. The stupid.

And I wonder. When GW is obvious to everyone, will these people who are sceptics
now, come back here and admit their mistake ? Take responsibility and be men ?

I doubt it. They will find someone else to blame. The scientists, the politicians,
anyone but themselves.
"Remember Bender, if you do it right, no one is sure you have done anything at all". -God. In Godfellas.

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#22 Post by dVTB »

Edited.
Last edited by dVTB on Sun 07 Sep 2008, 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gregf
Posts: 1802
Joined: Fri 08 Dec 2006, 1:58 am
Contact:

#23 Post by gregf »

You're right dVTB. I broke my own rules about language. My apologies.

For the record, I still think scientists are not divided and evidence is overwhelming.

I have the advantage living in a hot country where it has been obvious for 10 years.
Our agriculture is dying. Permanent plantings like orchards are being ploughed into the ground.
Our city is about to spend a billion dollars on a de-salination plant to supply drinking water.
The rainfall is not enough even for that in Sydney, let alone the farmers in the bush.

And I am happy to accept responsibility if I am wrong. My point is the type of person
who is sceptical of everything and never admits they are wrong are screwing us all
and wont be there to take responsibility.


PS
pet shop boy wrote:Government pump fear into the populations minds and its swallowed up. People like gregf only believe these idiots cos their left wingers.
This sort of comment eventually gets to anyone. :?
"Remember Bender, if you do it right, no one is sure you have done anything at all". -God. In Godfellas.

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#24 Post by dVTB »

Edited.
Last edited by dVTB on Sun 07 Sep 2008, 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Danny C
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 12:19 am

#25 Post by Danny C »

dVTB wrote:I don't see why it's necessary to use qualifications like 'retard', 'fools', 'stupid' and 'criminals' for people who have a different opinion. As long as there's no clear scientific evidence for the human contribution to global warming, nor for global warming itself, it's all very premature and also not very constructive.
But there's a f*** of clear scientific evidence. Do you even know what a "scientific consensus" is?

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#26 Post by dVTB »

Edited.
Last edited by dVTB on Sun 07 Sep 2008, 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Danny C
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 12:19 am

#27 Post by Danny C »

dVTB wrote:I only don't share your (or their) opinion that the evidence is clear.
And I'm sure you have the level of expertise to be able to challenge the scientific community there too...

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#28 Post by dVTB »

Edited.
Last edited by dVTB on Sun 07 Sep 2008, 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
glennjridge
Posts: 8205
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm

#29 Post by glennjridge »

"The IPCC report estimates that sea level will increase between seven inches and two feet by the year 2100".

that above example shows the problem with GW crowd.
on the surface they are right. the earth is warming and the sea is and will rise. scientists agree and you would find hardly anyone who doesnt at least agree there is *a* warming.

but they want industry changed and overhauled for hazy and in some cases false prophesies , ie the sea level issue and that recent polar bear drowning report that turned out not to be based on correct facts.

I havent made up my mind yet whether the gregf's are purposely fudging points because they want to push an agenda they connect with for some reason or if they are just one of those sky is falling crowd that every generation seems to have.

alot of generations pick an issue and push it. history has some embarresed people saying this or that , sadly you never really hear about their follys because by the time they dont pan out, everyone on both sides is dead :)

User avatar
pet shop boy
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri 30 Mar 2007, 4:02 pm

#30 Post by pet shop boy »

dVTB wrote: I don't see why it's necessary to use qualifications like 'retard', 'fools', 'stupid' and 'criminals' for people who have a different opinion.
Fascists like Gregf dont aprreciate alternative views.
As long as there's no clear scientific evidence for the human contribution to global warming, nor for global warming itself, it's all very premature
Humans contribute to around 6% of global warming.
Claiming that the evidence is clear, is a very subjective opinion.
Its about the new world order controlling us, they put this shit out to scare us, put fear in our heads. Far left Liberals like greg and danncy think its about liberalism taking hold, when infact theres ZERO liberal about blaming the wrong people.

Neil Tennant will tell you that, he stopped funding the fascist New Labour party on similar grounds.
If sceptics like Corbyn are proved right and if the average temperature on earth stops climbing during the next year, the whole global warming thing might be a false alarm. So that's one reservation.
You're correct in the term if, its if's but's and maybe's, liberalist fascism. Today's "liberals" are Nazis. Yesterday's liberals were for the PEOPLE.
You can't blame people for being sceptic about statements that aren't properly proved yet.
You cant blame people for asking why petrol is legal...
And if the sceptics are proved right, will you come back here to apologize to the sceptics for calling them folls, stupid and criminals? Take your responsibility and be a man?
Modern "liberals" dont appologise, they dictate with brown shoes and a sympathetic hairstyle.
Theres a PSB song coming on :lol:
"Godd" Marco V
Do you believe in a god that satisfies?
Do you believe in a god that opens eyes?
Do you believe in a god that tells you lies?
Or do you believe in me?

Do you believe in a god that brings you down?
Do you believe in a god that wears a crown?
Do you believe in a god that makes you bow?
Or do you believe in me?

Post Reply