Undertaker wrote:England would have been one of the favourites. When aren't they? They didn't qualify because over those 2 years they weren't good enough. Although they would have qualified if they didn't have a penis in charge.
I love the way that tactical genius McClaren is being employed by the BBC for the duration of the tournament. That's your licence fee, folks!
Undertaker wrote:Although they would have qualified if they didn't have a penis in charge.
I always thought he was a fanny. Would having a fanny in charge instead of a penis have made any difference? I think they would be in the same position.
Patrick Bateman wrote:I love the way that tactical genius McClaren is being employed by the BBC for the duration of the tournament. That's your licence fee, folks!
It wouldn't be a normal day in Britain without seeing your licence fee spunked up the wall one way or another.
You're right though, it should have been abandoned or at least temporarily suspended. I've taken Turkey to win as well. They are a far better side. It's great entertainment though.
I remember the fantastically spiteful and incredibly entertaining Holland vs. Portugal from the last world cup. A full scale brawl of sorts would be welcomed at some stage during this tournament though.
Undertaker wrote: It doesn't matter. The 16 there got through because they deserved to.
Austria qualified ??!!?
I think this time, the policy of giving a wildcard to the hosts has back-fired spectacularly. At this rate, Switzerland and Austria will be the first to be eliminated.