Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
I'd be interested to know how much income sales like this actually generated for Neil and Chris. They presumably still get quite a healthy income from royalties, and back catalogue sales?
I always see reports about big artists earning millions from touring and I'd be interested to know how this works for our Pets.
Harry
I always see reports about big artists earning millions from touring and I'd be interested to know how this works for our Pets.
Harry
Heaven is possible,
AFTER ALL.
AFTER ALL.
-
Disco.
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Billboard is publishing income from concerts. One of the Electric concerts had a revenue of 384,000 $. I think you will be able to get the info from the others if you try hard enough. Discography is a constant trickle seller for them selling in the region of 18,000 in the U.S alone each year.
-
Disco.
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Electric is up to #41 in the Independent album chart, this week, it has spent 13 weeks in the Top 50, and has been in the Top 100 ever since it was released. In the overall chart it is around #220. Sales, about 1600 copies. If it continues to do well in the next two weeks, it could pass the 40,000 mark before the new year.
Last edited by Disco. on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jamie1978
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Thanks, interesting figures.
It's worth saying that revenue from concerts goes to the promoters, the artists usually get a fixed fee, with the promoter of the tour taking on the risks of venue hire and promotion cost. I believe their fee is approx £120,000 per show. How expenses for the 20+ people and all the tour logistics get paid I'm not sure.
Although I've always wondered why they bothered with a promoter for touring, they have a loyal fanbase across the world, why not just cut out the middleman (at least for the US and Europe) and keep all the revenue yourself?
It's worth saying that revenue from concerts goes to the promoters, the artists usually get a fixed fee, with the promoter of the tour taking on the risks of venue hire and promotion cost. I believe their fee is approx £120,000 per show. How expenses for the 20+ people and all the tour logistics get paid I'm not sure.
Although I've always wondered why they bothered with a promoter for touring, they have a loyal fanbase across the world, why not just cut out the middleman (at least for the US and Europe) and keep all the revenue yourself?
-
Disco.
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Electric up from #41 to 40 in the Independent album chart 22 weeks in the Top 100. Sales will most likely be higher than last week. There is a very good chance now that it will pass 40k before the end of the year. All the excellent reviews most be paying of.
-
Disco.
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Electric was around #250 in the U.K album chart last week. Sales between 1500-1600.
-
alig
- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Sun 02 Nov 2003, 7:06 pm
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Really? That's a lot more copies than I thought an album outside the 200 would sell.Disco. wrote:Electric was around #250 in the U.K album chart last week. Sales between 1500-1600.
"John 3:16."
-
Disco.
- Posts: 2465
- Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Christmas time !alig wrote:Really? That's a lot more copies than I thought an album outside the 200 would sell.Disco. wrote:Electric was around #250 in the U.K album chart last week. Sales between 1500-1600.
-
PSBForTheMasses
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2012, 7:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Disco, thank you very much for those figures. Nice to see Electric is still selling, albeit it being a trickle.
-
Nickname
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
According to this, the Geoff Stephen's track "Crying Game" sang by Boy George and produced by PSB was #1 in Canada:
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crying ... ci%C3%B3n)
It was the soundtrack frome the movie "Crying Game" which was one of the best movies of 1992.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crying ... ci%C3%B3n)
It was the soundtrack frome the movie "Crying Game" which was one of the best movies of 1992.
-
PSBForTheMasses
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2012, 7:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
I have read somewhere that Sting earns 2,000 dollars a day from Every time You Breath royalty/ copyrights only. So there must be some PSB classics playing over and over in radios. Do they not bring any income? I mean if a PSB song (though how rarely it is) is played in a Turkish radio station, do they pay any royalty to the Boys?Harry wrote:I'd be interested to know how much income sales like this actually generated for Neil and Chris. They presumably still get quite a healthy income from royalties, and back catalogue sales?
I always see reports about big artists earning millions from touring and I'd be interested to know how this works for our Pets.
Harry
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
A few updates applied. Feel free to post anything not in the original posts.
Ultimate is certified gold. This means its shipped 100,000 copies.
edited.
Ultimate is certified gold. This means its shipped 100,000 copies.
edited.
Last edited by Undertaker on Mon 28 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tenlow
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 1:52 pm
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
Undertaker wrote:
If the Pop Kids would have been number 44 from sales and downloads, it means it sold around 11,800. Now thats some going and is the third highest selling single in the past 10 years. Only Im With Stupid and Love etc are above it. I'm not convinced it would have been 44 though.
How is that possible? If that was the case it would actually BE #44 in the UK charts, wouldn't it? Even with zero streaming points.
-->
42 Meghan Trainor 12,504
45 AlunaGeorge feat. Popcaan 11,360
54 James Bay [Best Fake Smile] 9,799
60 James Bay [Running] 9,375
64 Flo Rida 7,981
65 Ariana Grande [Be Alright] 7,942
68 Shawn Mendes & Camila Cabello 7,711
Firing verbal shots like a tommy gun
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
I dont know. Which is why i said i'm not convinced. I took the sales as an average from the singles chart before streaming counted and the sales are usually around that for #44. The unit figures now are not much different from when streams counted. So to be #44 and then not to be top 100 seems complete bollocks to me. Either #44 is completely wrong or the cd sales werent eligible.Tenlow wrote:Undertaker wrote:
If the Pop Kids would have been number 44 from sales and downloads, it means it sold around 11,800. Now thats some going and is the third highest selling single in the past 10 years. Only Im With Stupid and Love etc are above it. I'm not convinced it would have been 44 though.
How is that possible? If that was the case it would actually BE #44 in the UK charts, wouldn't it? Even with zero streaming points.
-->
42 Meghan Trainor 12,504
45 AlunaGeorge feat. Popcaan 11,360
54 James Bay [Best Fake Smile] 9,799
60 James Bay [Running] 9,375
64 Flo Rida 7,981
65 Ariana Grande [Be Alright] 7,942
68 Shawn Mendes & Camila Cabello 7,711
*edit* or streaming has completely taken over the charts. 79% of streams make up the singles chart. Complete madness. So its highly likely The Pop Kids wouldnt have been anywhere near 44 because if streaming didnt count, the songs below it would have highly likely have sold more anyway.
- Tenlow
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 1:52 pm
Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History
At buzzjack they clearly said TPK would have been #44 if it still was only physicals + downloads.
But since streaming is extremely dominant these days (at least as far as the singles chart is concerned) it unfortunately is possible that it still didn't make the top 100 due to the lack of streams. Seems crazy but I guess that's what it is.
But since streaming is extremely dominant these days (at least as far as the singles chart is concerned) it unfortunately is possible that it still didn't make the top 100 due to the lack of streams. Seems crazy but I guess that's what it is.
Firing verbal shots like a tommy gun