Jokezzz on us!!

Message

weirdalfan1980 · #16 Post by **weirdalfan1980** » Sat 17 Apr 2004, 9:07 pm

btw Shen, i have a riddle for u: this is easy...... I learned this 10 years ago.

Couple of divers found two bodies, they immediately identified them as Adam and Eve, HOW did they come to this conclusion?

Undertaker · #17 Post by **Undertaker** » Sun 18 Apr 2004, 11:39 am

weirdalfan1980 wrote:btw Shen, i have a riddle for u: this is easy...... I learned this 10 years ago.

Couple of divers found two bodies, they immediately identified them as Adam and Eve, HOW did they come to this conclusion?

They had their credit cards still in their pockets?

Dave

mantooth · #18 Post by **mantooth** » Sun 18 Apr 2004, 5:15 pm

No... Was it that they were wearing fig leaves?

redsock · #19 Post by **redsock** » Sun 18 Apr 2004, 5:46 pm

The answer to the slightly mixed up question is that Adam and Eve are fish, and were the only two residents of their tank. Be it in an aquarium/home etc ... I'm not gonna nit pick with ya !

weirdalfan1980 · #20 Post by **weirdalfan1980** » Sun 18 Apr 2004, 7:10 pm

mantooth wrote:No... Was it that they were wearing fig leaves?

no but close.

TheLion · #21 Post by **TheLion** » Mon 19 Apr 2004, 4:59 pm

I know the answer - 'They didn't have bellybuttons'.

Leo

rags · #22 Post by **rags** » Mon 19 Apr 2004, 5:13 pm

Well... How can a third person identify Adam and Eve if the latter were the supposed first people on earth, so the third person could only have been a close relative of Adam and Eve...

define psb · #23 Post by **define psb** » Mon 19 Apr 2004, 8:16 pm

Logically the third person would have to be "God" (whoever that is)
Or maybe it was the serpent from the Garden of eden

weirdalfan1980 · #24 Post by **weirdalfan1980** » Wed 21 Apr 2004, 3:03 am

TheLion wrote:I know the answer - 'They didn't have bellybuttons'.

Leo

damn

redsock · #25 Post by **redsock** » Wed 21 Apr 2004, 1:11 pm

weirdalfan1980 wrote:
TheLion wrote:I know the answer - 'They didn't have bellybuttons'.

Leo
damn

A fictional answer then ?

And one that I dare say wouldn't hold up in court, if they died in suspicious circumstances !

weirdalfan1980 · #26 Post by **weirdalfan1980** » Wed 21 Apr 2004, 4:29 pm

redsock wrote:
weirdalfan1980 wrote:
TheLion wrote:I know the answer - 'They didn't have bellybuttons'.

Leo
damn
A fictional answer then ?

And one that I dare say wouldn't hold up in court, if they died in suspicious circumstances !

when i said divers that found them, doesnt mean they are fish!! Or suspicious situation

, it could be anyoneone find the, like me

or a lawyer or palaentoligist

redsock · #27 Post by **redsock** » Wed 21 Apr 2004, 6:00 pm

weirdalfan1980 wrote:
redsock wrote:
weirdalfan1980 wrote: damn
A fictional answer then ?

And one that I dare say wouldn't hold up in court, if they died in suspicious circumstances !
when i said divers that found them, doesnt mean they are fish!! Or suspicious situation , it could be anyoneone find the, like me or a lawyer or palaentoligist

We need a "tongue in cheek" quotation mode !

Scandal · #28 Post by **Scandal** » Tue 27 Apr 2004, 12:52 am

weirdalfan1980 wrote:
Couple of divers found two bodies, they immediately identified them as Adam and Eve, HOW did they come to this conclusion?

So what's the solution then?