Record companies vs piracy – now, this is desperate!
-
Eldritch
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am
Record companies vs piracy – now, this is desperate!
I was expecting a preview copy of the new Alanis Morissette album, because I have an interview with her coming up. So imagine my surprise, when the bicycle carrier turned up, handed me the envelope, made me sign a document but when I opened the envelope I found inside an album by someone called Arthur Moore. I was about to phone the record company to complain, but something about the initials made me check the album first.
Yup, you guessed it, it was our favourite Canadian moose-face. The false name was a clever ploy thought up by Warners to fool bootleggers. With such great minds working for record companies, the end of piracy must indeed be near.
Yup, you guessed it, it was our favourite Canadian moose-face. The false name was a clever ploy thought up by Warners to fool bootleggers. With such great minds working for record companies, the end of piracy must indeed be near.
Click click drone
-
One of the crowd
- Posts: 4796
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm
Re: Record companies vs piracy – now, this is desperate!
When you do interview her, I would sit well back. She has one huge gob and I fear you may be in danger of being swallowed whole!!!Eldritch wrote:I was expecting a preview copy of the new Alanis Morissette album, because I have an interview with her coming up. So imagine my surprise, when the bicycle carrier turned up, handed me the envelope, made me sign a document but when I opened the envelope I found inside an album by someone called Arthur Moore. I was about to phone the record company to complain, but something about the initials made me check the album first.
Yup, you guessed it, it was our favourite Canadian moose-face. The false name was a clever ploy thought up by Warners to fool bootleggers. With such great minds working for record companies, the end of piracy must indeed be near.
-
electroshocked
-
Eldritch
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am
Yes. But only part time nowadays. I was a full-time journalist for seven years, writing mostly about popular culture, but got burnt out a bit and went into publishing. But I still write record reviews, columns and an occasional interview.dVTB wrote:So you're a music journalist?[/b]
Click click drone
-
Eldritch
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am
Re: Record companies vs piracy – now, this is desperate!
It will be a phone interview, so I'll be safe. But thanks for your concern.Bowesy wrote:When you do interview her, I would sit well back. She has one huge gob and I fear you may be in danger of being swallowed whole!!!Eldritch wrote:I was expecting a preview copy of the new Alanis Morissette album, because I have an interview with her coming up. So imagine my surprise, when the bicycle carrier turned up, handed me the envelope, made me sign a document but when I opened the envelope I found inside an album by someone called Arthur Moore. I was about to phone the record company to complain, but something about the initials made me check the album first.
Yup, you guessed it, it was our favourite Canadian moose-face. The false name was a clever ploy thought up by Warners to fool bootleggers. With such great minds working for record companies, the end of piracy must indeed be near.
I did interview her face to face though in Los Angeles in 1998. A pleasant woman, though hardly the best interviewee around.
Click click drone
- Avalon
- Posts: 1927
- Joined: Fri 07 Nov 2003, 8:39 am
- Contact:
-
Lethe
Exactly.tweety wrote:All in all, the record companies are ridiculous. They actually think that their business is going down because of mp3s and piracy. The fact is that they put out TOO MUCH MUSIC of which TOO MUCH IS CRAP.
Anybody who bought that Atomic Kitten single last week should be the ones in court.
- Ray
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 6:32 am
The Atomic Kitten single is actually good.Lethe wrote:Exactly.tweety wrote:All in all, the record companies are ridiculous. They actually think that their business is going down because of mp3s and piracy. The fact is that they put out TOO MUCH MUSIC of which TOO MUCH IS CRAP.
Anybody who bought that Atomic Kitten single last week should be the ones in court.
Record companies don't put out too much music, that's never possible. What they do, though, is treating it like a by-product of a big business, they'd rather not deal with these silly artist types, which is why there is less and less good music and more and more "content". It's easier to deal with content providers than with artists, obviously.
<a href="http://www.myspace.com/raygrantmusic">(I wonder why) My career's in danger?!</a>
-
Lethe
-
Eldritch
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am
It's not as simple as that. The Robbie deal was special, because EMI also gets its share from Robbie's tours and merchandise deals - according to Word magazine some time ago. It's one of the new ways that the record companies try to protect themselves from piracy - after all, there is no way that the pirates can duplicate the gig experience. And since the record companies have made the big conscerts possible by their marketing of the artist, in a way it's only fair that they get their share of the concert profits.Lethe wrote:It's pop rather than art.
EMI gave Blobby Williams £80 million (because people buy his lame rock) and consequently have to make cutbacks.
The Robbie Williams deal was in no way as risky or stupid as many people think it is. On the other hand, the Mariah Carey deal was the disastrous one for EMI.
Click click drone