The Boys need a better proofreader!

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#136 Post by Sandy Shaw »

rashomon wrote: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 10:39 pm signs books and leaves
Excellent!
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#137 Post by Sandy Shaw »

daveid wrote: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 10:08 pm It was nice of Matt Johnson to step in!
Good one!
Isn't he the the lead singer of (the) The The?
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3893
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#138 Post by daveid »

Sandy Shaw wrote: Thu 08 Nov 2018, 8:52 am
daveid wrote: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 10:08 pm It was nice of Matt Johnson to step in!
Good one!
Isn't he the the lead singer of (the) The The?
Yep
Top
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#139 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
telys
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:
Contact telys

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#140 Post by telys »

100 lyrics and a poem is a disaster regarding its structure.
----
You've got me all wrong
Top
User avatar
Dog
Posts: 3849
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:
Contact Dog

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#141 Post by Dog »

Sandy Shaw wrote:Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
Woof.
Top
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#142 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
Dog
Posts: 3849
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:
Contact Dog

The Boys need a better proofreader!

#143 Post by Dog »

Sandy Shaw wrote:
Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
Of course. We have met a couple of times Image
Woof.
Top
User avatar
telys
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:
Contact telys

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#144 Post by telys »

Dog wrote: Sat 08 May 2021, 9:56 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:
Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
Of course. We have met a couple of times Image
Cool, thus not all of us are inside the realm of obscure anonymity.
----
You've got me all wrong
Top
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#145 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Dog wrote: Sat 08 May 2021, 9:56 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:
Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
Of course. We have met a couple of times Image
😀 I remember.
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#146 Post by Sandy Shaw »

20260416_143032.jpg
There may be other errors, but there's a glaring one on page 58 of Volume after the words "innocent image" where I imagine a comma was intended.
I'm grateful to the Boys for each and every venture and product by the way, this thread is in that context. There's so much to enjoy that is spot on and brilliant!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4955
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#147 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Can you spot the blooper on this page from the latest Annually?
20260416_225959.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I'm your puppet
Top
User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3893
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#148 Post by daveid »

I haven't got that far yet with Literally, but I will say that Volume has a number of errors, more factual than spelling.
Top
User avatar
petshopgrrl
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed 03 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Contact:
Contact petshopgrrl

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#149 Post by petshopgrrl »

Sandy Shaw wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 11:02 pm Can you spot the blooper on this page from the latest Annually?
20260416_225959.jpg
Dammit Sandy, I just spent five minutes looking for stray apostrophes! But yes, that is quite a pretty and witty blooper. :lol:
For your own good, call me tonight.
Top
User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9950
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!

#150 Post by Patrick Bateman »

daveid wrote: Fri 17 Apr 2026, 12:45 am I haven't got that far yet with Literally, but I will say that Volume has a number of errors, more factual than spelling.
Really? That is disappointing, if unsurprising.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Pet Shop Boys Discussion”