National Television Awards

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
PSB-90
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2015, 11:24 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#46 Post by PSB-90 »

Janet Street-Porter seems OK though.

User avatar
raggatwin
Posts: 4184
Joined: Thu 18 Dec 2003, 4:31 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: National Television Awards

#47 Post by raggatwin »

daveid wrote: Sat 20 Dec 2025, 10:38 am She's gross. As for Walliams he's a racist hiding in plain sight and an all-round horrid creep. Probably in the closet too which may explain some of the nastiness.

Don't think he's ever been hiding. Always punched down. Creepy fcker
Hello my name is Neil Tennant and I'm Chris Lowe and we're of the Pet Shop Boys.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#48 Post by Gabby »

Let's put it this way - I'm not about to throw out my PSB teaset just because David Walliams owns one too.

I agree that PSB do have a few problematic acquaintances. I don't know that they would necessarily feel they'd need to grandstand about cutting ties with anyone though.

User avatar
Future Lover
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#49 Post by Future Lover »

Considering they've blocked me on Instagram for expressing disappointment in the perpetual re-casting of Frances Barber, they appear to take great pride in their problematic friendships. I guess they think everyone is cancelled in some way, so why care. Being friends with someone in their private life is perfectly fine - choosing who you highlight professionally and who you put your name behind is another thing completely.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9964
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: National Television Awards

#50 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Future Lover wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 1:53 pm Considering they've blocked me on Instagram for expressing disappointment in the perpetual re-casting of Frances Barber, they appear to take great pride in their problematic friendships. I guess they think everyone is cancelled in some way, so why care. Being friends with someone in their private life is perfectly fine - choosing who you highlight professionally and who you put your name behind is another thing completely.
Neil strikes me as someone who likes being friends with famous people. It's part of why they went off the boil in the 90s - sitting in The Groucho Club thinking your famous friends are more interesting than they really are. I blame cocaine.

User avatar
Synthrobot
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#51 Post by Synthrobot »

I will support David Walliams until he is PROVED to have done something wrong. The man is a legend. Until he is CONVICTED of something awful, my stance will not change.

richwill
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#52 Post by richwill »

Synthrobot wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 7:09 pm I will support David Walliams until he is PROVED to have done something wrong. The man is a legend. Until he is CONVICTED of something awful, my stance will not change.
Synthrobot wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 7:09 pm I will support David Walliams until he is PROVED to have done something wrong. The man is a legend. Until he is CONVICTED of something awful, my stance will not change.
Yeah, way to go, just like Jimmy Savile.

richwill
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#53 Post by richwill »

Future Lover wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 1:53 pm Considering they've blocked me on Instagram for expressing disappointment in the perpetual re-casting of Frances Barber, they appear to take great pride in their problematic friendships. I guess they think everyone is cancelled in some way, so why care. Being friends with someone in their private life is perfectly fine - choosing who you highlight professionally and who you put your name behind is another thing completely.

Plus the equally vile TAO.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#54 Post by markus »

I’m not going to comment on David Walliams since don't know anything, but in cases like P. Diddy’s, it's hypocrisy and typical American double standards. Everyone involved was consenting and paid. The Weinstein and Epstein cases showed how the system can be used to extract money from the rich and powerful, with the government sponsoring organised criminality through settlements and payouts. Anyone can blackmail a famous person these days.

OakeyDokey
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun 04 Oct 2020, 10:05 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#55 Post by OakeyDokey »

Synthrobot wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 7:09 pm I will support David Walliams until he is PROVED to have done something wrong. The man is a legend. Until he is CONVICTED of something awful, my stance will not change.
What's he ever done that's legendary apart from throwing moon-eyes at Neil and Chris during the TotP performance of Liberation? Bullying, snide fvcker of a man.

User avatar
jasonjohn
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 12:10 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: National Television Awards

#56 Post by jasonjohn »

Future Lover wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 1:53 pm Considering they've blocked me on Instagram for expressing disappointment in the perpetual re-casting of Frances Barber, they appear to take great pride in their problematic friendships. I guess they think everyone is cancelled in some way, so why care. Being friends with someone in their private life is perfectly fine - choosing who you highlight professionally and who you put your name behind is another thing completely.
Well the person managing the acc probably did. I can understand famous people trying to limit backlash, or protect the people they work with. Probably not pride.

Francis Barber isn't my favourite, but I don't think anyone deserves to be completely cancelled for thinking (wrongly or rightly) they need to speak up for women's spaces - these things are lived experiences just as much as trans.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9964
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: National Television Awards

#57 Post by Patrick Bateman »

jasonjohn wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 12:59 am
Well the person managing the acc probably did. I can understand famous people trying to limit backlash, or protect the people they work with. Probably not pride.

Francis Barber isn't my favourite, but I don't think anyone deserves to be completely cancelled for thinking (wrongly or rightly) they need to speak up for women's spaces - these things are lived experiences just as much as trans.
I don't think she should be cancelled for her views but there's definitely something off about PSB continuing to work with someone with those views, considering their own position. It seems contradictory, although I suspect her politics are well aligned with Neil's, so that's probably the reason.

richwill
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#58 Post by richwill »

"Completely cancelled" doesn't mean anything, people in the public eye are not immune to criticism. Your characterisation of her position is absurd. Another curious dimension is their friendship with the similarly transphobic and also very racist Tracey Ann Obermann.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9964
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: National Television Awards

#59 Post by Patrick Bateman »

richwill wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 6:43 am "Completely cancelled" doesn't mean anything, people in the public eye are not immune to criticism. Your characterisation of her position is absurd. Another curious dimension is their friendship with the similarly transphobic and also very racist Tracey Ann Obermann.
Jeez, are they friends with her too?

User avatar
jasonjohn
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 12:10 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: National Television Awards

#60 Post by jasonjohn »

richwill wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 6:43 am"Completely cancelled" doesn't mean anything, people in the public eye are not immune to criticism.
Of course not. But some are talking about preventing people from being friends, or working with others, though right?

Critique away with counter points to whatever they said, but I haven't heard anything outright hateful. Wanting to protect women's spaces isn't hateful, even if they are somewhat wrong about some points.

Post Reply