If you mean singles, there are a couple of weird outlier cases like Axis and Fluorescent too.tottenhammattspurs wrote: Mon 12 Jan 2026, 11:56 pm So songs that they pretend don’t exist:-
Bobby O era West End girls and OMC
How can you expect to be taken seriously? Absolutely fabulous, burning the heather, she’s Madonna, Dj culturemix, break 4 love, integral. Have I missed any…..?
What have Seriously done to deserve this?
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
I agree. There seems to be less urgency to reinvent the song for single releases. I'm still annoyed about Thursday, and how they fixed one issue from the album version only to create a new one on the single. As a result neither versions 100% work for me.Patrick Bateman wrote: Mon 12 Jan 2026, 9:42 pmSuburbia was definitely the template for this. It's one of the things I miss about modern PSB - single mixes are edits now, rather than remixes.Drico One wrote: Mon 12 Jan 2026, 8:30 pm Remixed singles usually do - or did.
Suburbia, Rent, Heart, Left to my own devices, It's alright... I'd say the Jealousy single was better too. I wouldn't normally do is more debatable. I think it lost something in the horns and bombast of the 7", but it depends on my mood. A red letter day never sounded right in any version.
-
VRIDD
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue 27 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Purple zonetottenhammattspurs wrote: Mon 12 Jan 2026, 11:56 pm So songs that they pretend don’t exist:-
Bobby O era West End girls and OMC
How can you expect to be taken seriously? Absolutely fabulous, burning the heather, she’s Madonna, Dj culturemix, break 4 love, integral. Have I missed any…..?
- Spittingcat
- Posts: 1412
- Joined: Thu 27 Sep 2012, 11:11 am
- Contact:
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Axis and Burning the heather are my two favourite lead singles that are no longer considered singles at all.
- Patrick Bateman
- Posts: 9962
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
To be fair to them, they have had to edit them down to three minutes in order to get radio play, whereas back in the 80s they could pretty much do what they liked and it got played.Gabby wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 1:47 am
I agree. There seems to be less urgency to reinvent the song for single releases. I'm still annoyed about Thursday, and how they fixed one issue from the album version only to create a new one on the single. As a result neither versions 100% work for me.
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
With this "since 1984"-stuff we can't really say that they pretend the first version of West End girls doesn't exist but I would definately say that they revision away everything in between West End girls'84 and West End girls'85. And it's a lot. It's all the stuff done with Bobby O..everything short of mixing the album and releasing it, the criss-crossing in '85 recording stuff until finding the right sound with Hague.NotInvisible wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 12:08 amIf you mean singles, there are a couple of weird outlier cases like Axis and Fluorescent too.tottenhammattspurs wrote: Mon 12 Jan 2026, 11:56 pm So songs that they pretend don’t exist:-
Bobby O era West End girls and OMC
How can you expect to be taken seriously? Absolutely fabulous, burning the heather, she’s Madonna, Dj culturemix, break 4 love, integral. Have I missed any…..?
In that sense it's great that we got A Man Could Get-- 7'' which sounds like nothing else in the PSB catalogue.
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
I also think, to be fair, they have acknowledged Opportunities was released prior to West End girls by the simple fact that on the videographies they always place the first iteration of it ahead of West End girls in the chronology.
The Bobby O stuff make for interesting curios, but I can sort of see why they would prefer to ignore it. I'd hardly call that revisionism.
The Bobby O stuff make for interesting curios, but I can sort of see why they would prefer to ignore it. I'd hardly call that revisionism.
-
TallThinMan
- Posts: 1840
- Joined: Sun 04 Jun 2006, 6:50 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Let's also remember that they paid Bobby O a million dollars so they could leave all that behind and make a fresh start with Parlophone.Gabby wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 2:33 pm The Bobby O stuff make for interesting curios, but I can sort of see why they would prefer to ignore it. I'd hardly call that revisionism.
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Exactly - it might, in retrospect for them, not be representative of the happiest of times, so maybe they'd just prefer to leave as much of that as they can in the rearview mirror.TallThinMan wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 3:31 pmLet's also remember that they paid Bobby O a million dollars so they could leave all that behind and make a fresh start with Parlophone.Gabby wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 2:33 pm The Bobby O stuff make for interesting curios, but I can sort of see why they would prefer to ignore it. I'd hardly call that revisionism.
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Still, after 40 years time?! That's really keeping your grudges. Laughable TBH. Sometimes it seems as if 1983 is just as living for N&C as 2025. They still keep bringing out songs demoed back then. Their view of time might be non-linear.Gabby wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 4:18 pmExactly - it might, in retrospect for them, not be representative of the happiest of times, so maybe they'd just prefer to leave as much of that as they can in the rearview mirror.TallThinMan wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 3:31 pmLet's also remember that they paid Bobby O a million dollars so they could leave all that behind and make a fresh start with Parlophone.Gabby wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 2:33 pm The Bobby O stuff make for interesting curios, but I can sort of see why they would prefer to ignore it. I'd hardly call that revisionism.
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
-
TallThinMan
- Posts: 1840
- Joined: Sun 04 Jun 2006, 6:50 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Their record company doesn't have the rights to the Bobby O version of 'West End Girls' and also it wasn't a hit. Neither was the first version of 'Opportunities'.
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
Just came to say I love every version of Seriously to death. And that I always like to move my head as Chris does on the video when I listen to it.
The live version on Performance, with them being pinched by pigs and crushed by their own images. And then the pigs doing... well, you know. It's the greatest and closest metaphore of music business in the history of, well, music. EPIC!!!!!!
And also the best bassline in their whole catalogue (I mean the single one, of course).
And I also love that only recently I learned is "you gotta have funk" and not "You gotta have fun".
The live version on Performance, with them being pinched by pigs and crushed by their own images. And then the pigs doing... well, you know. It's the greatest and closest metaphore of music business in the history of, well, music. EPIC!!!!!!
And also the best bassline in their whole catalogue (I mean the single one, of course).
And I also love that only recently I learned is "you gotta have funk" and not "You gotta have fun".
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
I love all the versions of Seriously too but the single remix should have got more recognition.lalolalo wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 6:56 pm Just came to say I love every version of Seriously to death. And that I always like to move my head as Chris does on the video when I listen to it.
The live version on Performance, with them being pinched by pigs and crushed by their own images. And then the pigs doing... well, you know. It's the greatest and closest metaphore of music business in the history of, well, music. EPIC!!!!!!
And also the best bassline in their whole catalogue (I mean the single one, of course).
And I also love that only recently I learned is "you gotta have funk" and not "You gotta have fun".
It features in a little "thought experiment" I did recently for a Spotify playlist I've called "Pet Shop Boys, Conditional" - I challenged myself to pick only two songs from every PSB studio album - and only one song from PSB EP's - that I would pick above all others from each one. It really helps you home in on what songs REALLY matter to you.
The only unfortunate part is you end up having to exclude some brilliant tracks that aren't on studio album/EPs.
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
The track Pet Shop Boys is the 'lost' PSB song. Just vanished.telys wrote: Tue 13 Jan 2026, 1:29 pmWith this "since 1984"-stuff we can't really say that they pretend the first version of West End girls doesn't exist but I would definately say that they revision away everything in between West End girls'84 and West End girls'85. And it's a lot. It's all the stuff done with Bobby O..everything short of mixing the album and releasing it, the criss-crossing in '85 recording stuff until finding the right sound with Hague.
- Sexy Northeasterner
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2025, 8:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: What have Seriously done to deserve this?
I thought the same, however the single version of I wouldn’t normally do this kind of thing appears on FL and that’s a remix by Beatmasters, also didn’t Motiv-8 remix a red letter day which also appears on FL.Hillbilly wrote: Sun 11 Jan 2026, 10:01 pm It's really strange that it has never been released on any Further Listening either, but maybe it's because the single version is a remix by Brothers In Rhythm and they have only included their own remixes on the FL collections. But as a de facto single A-side it should definitely have been included on a compilation at least!