Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1606 Post by NotInvisible »

markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 8:57 pmI wasn't accusing Chris of plagiarism.
No, you were - ludicrously - claiming Pet Shop Boys were heavily influenced by checks notes a song that sounds nothing like How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll. But hey, I guess it's on brand for you.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1607 Post by markus »

NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:42 pm
markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 8:57 pmI wasn't accusing Chris of plagiarism.
No, you were - ludicrously - claiming Pet Shop Boys were heavily influenced by checks notes a song that sounds nothing like How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll. But hey, I guess it's on brand for you.
Chris has clearly taken inspiration from those two songs — you’d have to be tone-deaf not to hear it.

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1608 Post by NotInvisible »

markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:47 pmChris has clearly taken inspiration from those two songs — you’d have to be tone-deaf not to hear it.
LMFAO

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1609 Post by markus »

NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:48 pm
markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:47 pmChris has clearly taken inspiration from those two songs — you’d have to be tone-deaf not to hear it.
LMFAO
Yeah me too.

User avatar
Xakrij
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue 13 Dec 2016, 1:11 am
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1610 Post by Xakrij »

There are a few members who should just STOP! constantly publicly posting unhealthy messages against each other in this thread. Please use the PM feature.

I've recently discovered the 'Foe' option.
Shot in the fatal cause 'of frock-and-droll'

dylanww73
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1611 Post by dylanww73 »

Xakrij wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:58 pm There are a few members who should just STOP! constantly publicly posting unhealthy messages against each other in this thread. Please use the PM feature.
:clap:

It's like a (tedious, childish) game of tennis
Spoiler
Ha - made you look!

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1612 Post by NotInvisible »

dylanww73 wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:04 pmIt's like a (tedious, childish) game of tennis
I just have a low bar for moronic hot takes. But I should learn that when you wrestle with a pig, you both wind up in the mud, so fair enough.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1613 Post by markus »

NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:06 pm
dylanww73 wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:04 pmIt's like a (tedious, childish) game of tennis
I just have a low bar for moronic hot takes. But I should learn that when you wrestle with a pig, you both wind up in the mud, so fair enough.
Good you let the moderators know what your intentions with the forum have been all along.

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1614 Post by NotInvisible »

markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:46 pmGood you let the moderators know what your intentions with the forum have been all along.
You might want to read that one again, chief.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1615 Post by markus »

NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:56 pm
markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:46 pmGood you let the moderators know what your intentions with the forum have been all along.
You might want to read that one again, chief.
You have no place in this forum, you can shut up now.

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1616 Post by NotInvisible »

markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:58 pmYou have no place in this forum, you can shut up now.
What a strange little man. Off you pop.

Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.

User avatar
Dog
Posts: 3850
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1617 Post by Dog »

NotInvisible wrote:
markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:58 pmYou have no place in this forum, you can shut up now.
Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
I think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.

“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”

“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”

Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.

It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.

It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.

There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”

He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.

That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Woof.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1618 Post by markus »

Dog wrote: Tue 24 Feb 2026, 7:41 am
NotInvisible wrote:
markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:58 pmYou have no place in this forum, you can shut up now.
Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
I think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.

“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”

“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”

Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.

It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.

It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.

There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”

He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.

That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Absolutely brilliant.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1619 Post by telys »

Dog wrote: Tue 24 Feb 2026, 7:41 am
NotInvisible wrote:
markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:58 pmYou have no place in this forum, you can shut up now.
Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
I think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.

“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”

“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”

Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.

It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.

It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.

There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”

He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.

That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unfortunately it says more about Neil, or rather is idea of what rock is, than it says anything about rock music. As I've said before, this is an area where Neil is dead wrong.
I mean did he ever consider the different aspects of the heavy metal scene.
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
Dog
Posts: 3850
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1620 Post by Dog »

telys wrote:
Dog wrote: Tue 24 Feb 2026, 7:41 am
NotInvisible wrote: Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
I think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.

“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”

“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”

Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.

It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.

It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.

There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”

He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.

That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unfortunately it says more about Neil, or rather is idea of what rock is, than it says anything about rock music. As I've said before, this is an area where Neil is dead wrong.
I mean did he ever consider the different aspects of the heavy metal scene.
Well, don’t forget Neil wrote it in the mid-90s. Maybe he’s now a massive Tool fan.
Woof.

Post Reply