No, you were - ludicrously - claiming Pet Shop Boys were heavily influenced by checks notes a song that sounds nothing like How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll. But hey, I guess it's on brand for you.
Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Chris has clearly taken inspiration from those two songs — you’d have to be tone-deaf not to hear it.NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:42 pmNo, you were - ludicrously - claiming Pet Shop Boys were heavily influenced by checks notes a song that sounds nothing like How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll. But hey, I guess it's on brand for you.
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
LMFAOmarkus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:47 pmChris has clearly taken inspiration from those two songs — you’d have to be tone-deaf not to hear it.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Yeah me too.NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:48 pmLMFAOmarkus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:47 pmChris has clearly taken inspiration from those two songs — you’d have to be tone-deaf not to hear it.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
There are a few members who should just STOP! constantly publicly posting unhealthy messages against each other in this thread. Please use the PM feature.
I've recently discovered the 'Foe' option.
I've recently discovered the 'Foe' option.
Shot in the fatal cause 'of frock-and-droll'
-
dylanww73
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Xakrij wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 9:58 pm There are a few members who should just STOP! constantly publicly posting unhealthy messages against each other in this thread. Please use the PM feature.
It's like a (tedious, childish) game of tennis
Spoiler
Ha - made you look!
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
I just have a low bar for moronic hot takes. But I should learn that when you wrestle with a pig, you both wind up in the mud, so fair enough.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Good you let the moderators know what your intentions with the forum have been all along.NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:06 pmI just have a low bar for moronic hot takes. But I should learn that when you wrestle with a pig, you both wind up in the mud, so fair enough.
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
You might want to read that one again, chief.markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:46 pmGood you let the moderators know what your intentions with the forum have been all along.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
You have no place in this forum, you can shut up now.NotInvisible wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:56 pmYou might want to read that one again, chief.markus wrote: Mon 23 Feb 2026, 10:46 pmGood you let the moderators know what your intentions with the forum have been all along.
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
What a strange little man. Off you pop.
Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
I think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.NotInvisible wrote:Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”
“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”
Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.
It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.
It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.
There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”
He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.
That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Woof.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Absolutely brilliant.Dog wrote: Tue 24 Feb 2026, 7:41 amI think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.NotInvisible wrote:Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”
“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”
Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.
It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.
It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.
There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”
He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.
That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Unfortunately it says more about Neil, or rather is idea of what rock is, than it says anything about rock music. As I've said before, this is an area where Neil is dead wrong.Dog wrote: Tue 24 Feb 2026, 7:41 amI think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.NotInvisible wrote:Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”
“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”
Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.
It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.
It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.
There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”
He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.
That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I mean did he ever consider the different aspects of the heavy metal scene.
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Well, don’t forget Neil wrote it in the mid-90s. Maybe he’s now a massive Tool fan.telys wrote:Unfortunately it says more about Neil, or rather is idea of what rock is, than it says anything about rock music. As I've said before, this is an area where Neil is dead wrong.Dog wrote: Tue 24 Feb 2026, 7:41 amI think you’re being a little dismissive. Being anti‑rock is a classic Pet Shop Boys theme - and this song is one of their purest lyrical distillations of it.NotInvisible wrote: Back to How I Learned to Hate Rock 'n' Roll - how does everyone feel about these sort of "throwaway" tracks? I'd put this in the same category as Transparent, Pazzo! and the like. I rarely come back to them.
“Someone states the obvious
Someone sneers at all you love
Someone preaches ugly manners
excluding some, including me”
“All feelings blunted, all passion spent
Everybody does what everybody does
All the broken promises
to recreate a status quo”
Neil was (and probably still is) a rock fan. But he “learned” to hate it. It’s a song about exclusion, judgement, and disillusionment. Neil is rejecting what rock became: it promised liberation but delivered conformity.
It’s also entirely plausible that rock ’n’ roll is a metaphor for heteronormative culture and masculine expectations. Neil moved from rock to pop - but he also moved from being straight to being gay. His shift in musical allegiance mirrors his deeper shift in identity.
It always reminds me of Neil’s 1992 interview with Select magazine entitled “Hate: The Power of Negative Thinking”.
There he’s saying: “Sometimes you can only define yourself by what you hate. Hatred becomes energising.”
He describes hate as creative fuel - a way to reject the herd, to rebel against sameness, to carve out individuality.
That philosophy runs through this song. It’s a critique of rock culture but it’s also a coded narrative about identity, rebellion, and the power of negative emotion to shape who you are. It’s ultimately a song about losing faith in something you once loved and finding clarity in that loss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I mean did he ever consider the different aspects of the heavy metal scene.
Woof.