Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4072
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2116 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
leesmapman wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 11:19 am The release album so far has been good.
I agree... and this track is my favourite from the album. Imagine a ten track album where they kept this standard up until the end! Alas, we know that's not what happened.

Listening with fresh ears, I Get Along sounds really warm and cruisy. I love it. The politics is totally lost on me, but I don't feel I'm enjoying it any less for that lack of context.

:dance:

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9950
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2117 Post by Patrick Bateman »

A warm-up for their Mott the Hoople cover a couple of decades later.

User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4701
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2118 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

And still remain the only PSB official single without a remix
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2416
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2119 Post by Gabby »

Needed a more appropriate video.

I think someone said it earlier that they should have gone "all in" on the real instrumentation sounds, and this song is a case in point. Could have sounded like a real Oasis banger but its a damp squib by comparison.

I like it well enough, but do feel it could have been so much more.

User avatar
Richard-Eastham
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri 01 Aug 2025, 11:57 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2120 Post by Richard-Eastham »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 1:30 pm And still remain the only PSB official single without a remix
Peter Mandleson made three mixes in total:

His original mix was in December 1998, after failing to declare an interest-free loan from a colleague. The first remix was in January 2001, following allegations that he had improperly influenced a passport application, and the second (and final?) remix was in September 2025, when he was removed from his post as British Ambassador to the United States.

Related, and credit to Dorian Lynskey’s Bluesky account for this obscure fact – Pet Shop Boys are the only band to have written two songs about scandals linking politicians and osteopaths :lol:
If life is worth living, it’s got to be run, as a means of giving, not as a race to be won

User avatar
MikeyC
Posts: 1933
Joined: Sat 07 Oct 2006, 5:28 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2121 Post by MikeyC »

The morning after the night before…
A favorite, albeit simple, lyric!

NotInvisible
Posts: 956
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2122 Post by NotInvisible »

Lleonard Pler wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 8:40 am ]Track 139: I get along
Chronology: Release - Track 2
Another brilliant track, this time a single that doesn't just bend the PSB model so much as break it and reinvent it. "'It's not what you think it is," you said..." just glorious. I'd love for them to play this live. After whatever Nightlife and Closer to Heaven were, we're 2/2 now and about to hit 3/3 with the masterpiece that is Birthday Boy. The album ultimately can't sustain itself - a track list swapping out certain tracks for b-sides would have been brilliant. They really needed this to reinvent themselves.

NOBODY75
Posts: 215
Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2123 Post by NOBODY75 »

A great song. When it first came out, I liked it less than I do now. The change in sound on Release was a bit of a struggle for me back then, especially with this second single. Now I think songs like this enrich their catalog because they move away from their usual sound, diversifying it and demonstrating and reinforcing their songwriting quality.

And yes, the album has started off very well.

Towa
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon 03 Apr 2023, 9:20 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2124 Post by Towa »

So far I’m the only one here that doesn’t like it! I’m actually a bit surprised by that, I guess I assumed that everyone shared my opinion! :D But that’s just fun and part of what makes this thread so great, I really like reading all your opinions, and there is nothing right or wrong here ;)

Btw, I LOVE Home and dry - I think it’s superb!

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2125 Post by telys »

Gabby wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 2:35 pm Needed a more appropriate video.

I think someone said it earlier that they should have gone "all in" on the real instrumentation sounds, and this song is a case in point. Could have sounded like a real Oasis banger but its a damp squib by comparison.

I like it well enough, but do feel it could have been so much more.
Yep, I guess it was me talking about (and getting dissed as well) having real drums on Release instead of programmed ones.
I mean, electronic music is all about creating soundscapes and the rhythm, drums, are supposed to sound.... electronic.... but you don't programme drums to sound like real drums... you just don't... then you bring in a real drummer instead.
----
You've got me all wrong

NotInvisible
Posts: 956
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2126 Post by NotInvisible »

telys wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 9:59 pmbut you don't programme drums to sound like real drums... you just don't...
You certainly can. And indeed they did.

rathound
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2127 Post by rathound »

Probably my favourite on the album. Very nice track and do like the chorus. The politics side of it is quite clever as well, maybe relevant again with Mandelson in the news recently

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2128 Post by telys »

NotInvisible wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 11:34 pm
telys wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 9:59 pmbut you don't programme drums to sound like real drums... you just don't...
You certainly can. And indeed they did.
And what a grandiose failure it was.
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
PSB-90
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2015, 11:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2129 Post by PSB-90 »

The Blair/Mandelson trilogy: I get along, Legacy, Hoping for a miracle.

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2130 Post by Lleonard Pler »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Wed 17 Jun 2026, 1:30 pm And still remain the only PSB official single without a remix
Beautiful people, Burning the Heather and Feel didn't have remixes, did they?

Post Reply