I agree it's awful, but it raises an interesting question. Would we rather have a perfectly curated catalogue or would we rather have a chance to hear the doodles, sketches and missed targets?davidctecno wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 4:15 pm Motoring:
It’s awful. Not everything is worth releasing: there was no need to put out this demo. There are some demos in the *Further Listening* sets that don't add anything of value.
Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
-
NOBODY75
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Initially, I’d lean towards option B. But then I listen to Motoring, and I jump headfirst into option A.Sammy Jenkis wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 4:39 pm It's not an attempt to write in the style of Brecht/Weill by any chance? The combination of chord change, production and tune remind me of what keeps mankind alive.
-
NOBODY75
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Initially, I’d lean towards option B. But then I listen to Motoring, and I jump headfirst into option A.NotInvisible wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 6:57 pmI agree it's awful, but it raises an interesting question. Would we rather have a perfectly curated catalogue or would we rather have a chance to hear the doodles, sketches and missed targets?davidctecno wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 4:15 pm Motoring:
It’s awful. Not everything is worth releasing: there was no need to put out this demo. There are some demos in the *Further Listening* sets that don't add anything of value.
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3569
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Not even on a b-side collectionrathound wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 1:58 pm its horrible. but its an experiment and shoved it on a b-side collection so fine.
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3569
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
I'm for option B, if only to see how an artist progressed. If you look at Jean-Michel Jarre, there's a huge leap between Magnetic Fields and Zoolook. Turns out that when you listen to Music For Supermarkets, which is released between these two albums, in a total print run of 1 so it was hard to listen to for years, you see the transition between these other two albums.NotInvisible wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 6:57 pm I agree it's awful, but it raises an interesting question. Would we rather have a perfectly curated catalogue or would we rather have a chance to hear the doodles, sketches and missed targets?
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 4074
- Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Greetings,
Let's keep motoring along.
Track 152: Love Life
Chronology: Release FL CD1:5
Originally written for Alcazar, later released as a limited edition RSD 7".
Not an especially powerful or engaging song, rather repetitive, but made pleasant enough through its nu-disco stylings.
Retro.
Let's keep motoring along.
Track 152: Love Life
Chronology: Release FL CD1:5
Originally written for Alcazar, later released as a limited edition RSD 7".
Not an especially powerful or engaging song, rather repetitive, but made pleasant enough through its nu-disco stylings.
Retro.
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3569
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
It's a poppy song, and better than I always remember. Every time I play it I think: yeah, this is rather good, isn't it?