Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4720
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2446 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

Disco. wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 3:02 pm The 12” version of Paninaro was also available On the 12” single that was released only in Italy.
That, I believe, was released AFTER Disco. Happy to be proven wrong....
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3914
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2447 Post by daveid »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 7:23 pm
Disco. wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 3:02 pm The 12” version of Paninaro was also available On the 12” single that was released only in Italy.
That, I believe, was released AFTER Disco. Happy to be proven wrong....
The release date for Paninaro remains a mystery to this day

Lush
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat 08 Nov 2003, 10:12 am

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2448 Post by Lush »

daveid wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 9:36 pm
tottenhammattspurs wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 7:23 pm
Disco. wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 3:02 pm The 12” version of Paninaro was also available On the 12” single that was released only in Italy.
That, I believe, was released AFTER Disco. Happy to be proven wrong....
The release date for Paninaro remains a mystery to this day
I have done a lot of research on release dates for singles dating all the way back to the early 60s, and while the exact date is sometimes lost in the mists of time, you can usually find the month of release. Not so with the limited Italian "Paninaro" release. No one appears to know, except that it was 1986. You'd think the information was available somewhere in the vaults of EMI Italia.
"Unprofessional? Us? Sir. Might I with due respect remind you that Mister Vandemar and myself burned down the City of Troy? We brought the Black Plague to Flanders. We have assassinated a dozen kings, five popes, half a hundred heroes and two accredited gods. Our last commission before this was the torturing to death of an entire monastery in sixteenth century Tuscany. We are utterly professional." - Mr Croup

User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3914
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2449 Post by daveid »

Lush wrote: Fri 28 Aug 2026, 9:47 am
daveid wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 9:36 pm
tottenhammattspurs wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 7:23 pm

That, I believe, was released AFTER Disco. Happy to be proven wrong....
The release date for Paninaro remains a mystery to this day
I have done a lot of research on release dates for singles dating all the way back to the early 60s, and while the exact date is sometimes lost in the mists of time, you can usually find the month of release. Not so with the limited Italian "Paninaro" release. No one appears to know, except that it was 1986. You'd think the information was available somewhere in the vaults of EMI Italia.
It was Autumn 1986 and that's the closest guess.

davidctecno
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun 30 May 2010, 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2450 Post by davidctecno »

Track 164 : Party Song FL Release CD2 :5

The group's funniest song?

The song stands out for its danceable rhythm and incorporates interpolations and songwriting credits from the disco classic "That's the Way (I Like It)" by KC and the Sunshine Band.

User avatar
Morse
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat 17 Feb 2024, 10:54 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2451 Post by Morse »

daveid wrote: Sat 29 Aug 2026, 9:25 am
Lush wrote: Fri 28 Aug 2026, 9:47 am
daveid wrote: Thu 27 Aug 2026, 9:36 pm

The release date for Paninaro remains a mystery to this day
I have done a lot of research on release dates for singles dating all the way back to the early 60s, and while the exact date is sometimes lost in the mists of time, you can usually find the month of release. Not so with the limited Italian "Paninaro" release. No one appears to know, except that it was 1986. You'd think the information was available somewhere in the vaults of EMI Italia.
It was Autumn 1986 and that's the closest guess.
Anyone who owns a copy of the Italian Paninaro 12" can check, too, but if you look at the wax runout on either side it should have "2015626-A 3-11-86 I" and "2015626-F 3-11-86 I" pressed into it. Both lacquers (for my copy at least - I've only ever had one!) were prepared on 3 November 1986, and “I” identifies the first lacquer/cut. EMI Italiana normally used things such as A and B as side/master identifiers rather so you don't interpret F as meaning the sixth pressing, sixth lacquer or such like. The "I" is the part that appears to identify the first lacquer generation.

Anyway, that means we can effectively rule out the often repeated September 1986 date for the release of the Paninaro Italian 12-inch edition. The physical master from which the record was cut didn't exist until 3 November 1986.

To corroborate this, around that time the Italian EMI 12-inch of Duran Duran's Notorious has a catalogue number of 14 2015686 which is only six catalogue increments after Paninaro's (which is 14 2015626). That 12" has an EMI Italiana A-side matrix dated 6-11-86, just three days after Paninaro.

NotInvisible
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2452 Post by NotInvisible »

davidctecno wrote: Sat 29 Aug 2026, 8:39 pm Track 164 : Party Song FL Release CD2 :5
In contention for their worst track. Why anyone would voluntarily listen to this I've no idea.

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3588
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2453 Post by leesmapman »

I made a funny mashup with Party Song and Nirvana's Smells like teen spirit. Needless to say, I made the Nirvana track a 100 times better.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2450
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2454 Post by Gabby »

I think it's one of those things where if Neil hadn't explained it, it wouldn't be nearly as interesting a song, a bit like someone having to explain a joke that nobody understands.

Its fun in its own way. I don't dislike it.

Post Reply