Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2467
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2476 Post by Gabby »

Morse wrote: Thu 03 Sep 2026, 7:45 pm
daveid wrote: Thu 03 Sep 2026, 12:14 am
Morse wrote: Sat 29 Aug 2026, 9:40 pm

Anyone who owns a copy of the Italian Paninaro 12" can check, too, but if you look at the wax runout on either side it should have "2015626-A 3-11-86 I" and "2015626-F 3-11-86 I" pressed into it. Both lacquers (for my copy at least - I've only ever had one!) were prepared on 3 November 1986, and “I” identifies the first lacquer/cut. EMI Italiana normally used things such as A and B as side/master identifiers rather so you don't interpret F as meaning the sixth pressing, sixth lacquer or such like. The "I" is the part that appears to identify the first lacquer generation.

Anyway, that means we can effectively rule out the often repeated September 1986 date for the release of the Paninaro Italian 12-inch edition. The physical master from which the record was cut didn't exist until 3 November 1986.

To corroborate this, around that time the Italian EMI 12-inch of Duran Duran's Notorious has a catalogue number of 14 2015686 which is only six catalogue increments after Paninaro's (which is 14 2015626). That 12" has an EMI Italiana A-side matrix dated 6-11-86, just three days after Paninaro.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
This is excellent DIY research - we can definitely narrow it down to November 1986. Now for an even harder one - the original version of One more chance.

Well, you’re in luck as I own the very first Pet Shop Boys release anywhere which was out on Bobcat. I’ve checked the actual dead wax on my copy and the West End Girls side is etched 4Z9-05019-4. That version contains:

One More Chance, Kordak mix, approximately 3:26
West End Girls, Bobby Orlando version, approximately 7:50

The timings printed on the label are wrong, mind you, which is another known feature of this pressing. There is also another Bobcat configuration using the same catalogue number, (with {-3}/{-5} on the wax runout), which replaces West End Girls with the Bobby O remix of One More Chance. So the -3/-4 pressing appears to be the configuration containing the earliest West End Girls material.

The chronology gets interesting here. The original West End Girls was definitely released in the UK through Epic as A4292 / TA4292 on 9 April 1984. Rhino Records support that. The Quietus also describes the 9 April 1984 release and explains that Epic licensed it on the same 9 April 1984 date for the UK. Rhino has subsequently stated that West End Girls was first released on Bobcat Records in the US on 9 April 1984.

So, unless someone can identify an earlier PSB release on Bobcat, we know 4Z9 05019 is the first ever Pet Shop Boys Bobcat catalogue release.

What I don’t think we can yet prove outright is that the specific 4Z9 05019 first pressing itself was issued on 9 April 1984 on Bobcat. That date is firmly established for the original West End Girls release, particularly the UK Epic issue, but I haven’t yet found a contemporary US Bobcat/CBS release sheet, Billboard listing or Cash Box entry which ties 4Z9 05019 specifically to 9 April 1984.

So as things stand my conclusion would be that 4Z9 05019 is the first Pet Shop Boys release on Bobcat Records, and my copy is the -3/-4 version containing the original Bobby Orlando West End Girls and it came out before One More Chance did in its own right. However, the exact US release date of the Bobcat pressing still needs documentary evidence before we can safely call it 9 April 1984m- although it’s by far the most likely given the evidence.
I've got both of those Bobcat 12" releases - let me know if you need me to check to confirm anything.

I found them by pure blind luck in the 80's at a department store in Warwick (yes where PSB played the castle) - known more for vacuum cleaners and clothing than records, but they had a treasure trove in their music department and probably had no idea.

davidctecno
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun 30 May 2010, 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2477 Post by davidctecno »


Track 167: Blue on blue. Further Listening Release CD2 :7


It’s fantastic. A short, direct song with a fast, unbridled rhythm. It speaks to how two completely opposite things can come together and become one, using the phrase "sky meets sea: blue upon blue." It is a metaphor for how two very different people can fit together in a romantic relationship.

Disco.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2478 Post by Disco. »

Like the minimalist approach off it, apparently a Chris Lowe favorite, which makes sense, when we know he’s fondness for simplistic uplifting moments in songs, I like that myself too !

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3599
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2479 Post by leesmapman »

Classic dark PSB track

User avatar
Kompakt&Bijou
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon 28 Oct 2024, 7:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2480 Post by Kompakt&Bijou »

Is it also a reference to the military phrase meaning friendly fire? That is, mistakenly attacking your own side?
... my dear Mostyn :eh:

rathound
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2481 Post by rathound »

I thought it was something about Tory MPs attacking each other or something. Not really dug a lot deeper into the lyrics.

It's an excellent track. I didn't warm to it so much on Format as it didn't seem to flow with the other tracks so well, maybe coming off the back of the horrible Elton In Private effort. But next to the other electro tunes on this disk it works a treat. Makes much more sense

User avatar
y3potential
Posts: 1718
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2011, 8:21 pm
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2482 Post by y3potential »

davidctecno wrote: Sat 05 Sep 2026, 7:21 am
Track 167: Blue on blue. Further Listening Release CD2 :7


It’s fantastic. A short, direct song with a fast, unbridled rhythm. It speaks to how two completely opposite things can come together and become one, using the phrase "sky meets sea: blue upon blue." It is a metaphor for how two very different people can fit together in a romantic relationship.
The bass line has hints of So Hard. That's not a bad thing !
There is beauty in ugliness and ugliness in beauty.

User avatar
petshopgrrl
Posts: 790
Joined: Wed 03 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2483 Post by petshopgrrl »

Kompakt&Bijou wrote: Sun 06 Sep 2026, 6:46 pm Is it also a reference to the military phrase meaning friendly fire? That is, mistakenly attacking your own side?
Supposedly, yes. Blues are friendlies, Reds are enemies.

But me, I've always assumed this one was about a gay holiday romance somewhere hot and sunny. Sure, the sky is blue and so is the sea but pink is for girls and blue is for boys, right?

Of course I might need to take my gaydar in for a tune-up - after all, it couldn't even detect the Truck Driver and his Mate. Anyway, neat track.
For your own good, call me tonight.

davidctecno
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun 30 May 2010, 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2484 Post by davidctecno »

davidctecno wrote: Sat 05 Sep 2026, 7:21 am
Track 168: Jack & Jill Party (demo( Further Listening Release CD2 :8


A single for Pete Burns. I love Pete's version, but I don't like the PSB version.
Neil sings the track using a pronounced Auto-Tune effect on a very artificial-sounding falsetto, losing all the power and drama that Pete brings to the song. What do you think about this?

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2485 Post by Lleonard Pler »

It was a fun and exciting Pete Burns record, but the PSB demo sounds lacklustre. I guess the lyrics just don't suit Neil's voice, they need a darker and naughtier edge. I had the CD for it, I think it had some remixes in it.

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3599
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2486 Post by leesmapman »

Great track. Obviously a demo, the Pete Burns release is so much better, meatier.
Lleonard Pler wrote: Tue 08 Sep 2026, 6:58 pm I had the CD for it, I think it had some remixes in it.
Single mix, extended mix and instrumental.

rathound
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2487 Post by rathound »

Oh I love this one. It's fantastic - one of my favourite tracks they've done. An absolute banger. Dirty, sleazy, sticky electroclash. I think Neil's voice works great on it - Pete Burns version is good but a bit too camp and over the top for my own tastes. Neil brings a much more subtle, lighter touch to sit nicely on top of the instrumental which is the real star here.

Can imagine the single got plenty of plays at Nag Nag Nag and the like. Very contemporary at the time and an absolute stand out on this disk imo. Good work chaps.

Post Reply