The EMI's dilemma (third single)

Message

Eldritch · #16 Post by **Eldritch** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 8:57 pm

I can see the rationale behind releasing Numb as the third single, even though I dislike it. After I'm with stupid and Minimal the album has pretty much sold as much as it can sell with the strength of "typical PSB-singles", so why not try to push it further with a non-typical PSB single by a renowned hitmaker? Fans will buy it anyway, especially if the b-sides pass muster, and if somebody else gets it, that's just a bonus.

Ronald42 · #17 Post by **Ronald42** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 9:08 pm

Luna park

Backed witch GOOD remixes of integral

Numb Sucks (Did I mention this B4 well it can't be said enough)

Technotrancemix · #18 Post by **Technotrancemix** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 9:09 pm

Integral has what it takes for a single release. The others don't and are too long to have a Radio Edit for 3:30 minutes.

BrilliantPSB · #19 Post by **BrilliantPSB** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 9:51 pm

I forgot to mention that SODOM is STILL being considered....

FreshDebesh · #20 Post by **FreshDebesh** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 9:56 pm

Pretty sure we'll see a single remix for Integral as the 3rd single.

dannii · #21 Post by **dannii** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 10:03 pm

Technotrancemix wrote:Integral has what it takes for a single release. The others don't and are too long to have a Radio Edit for 3:30 minutes.

don't let it fool you!
I get along (album version) is 6 minutes long and yet they managed to make 4 minutes long edit

Lleonard Pler · #22 Post by **Lleonard Pler** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 10:06 pm

Although I love it, I can't see Luna Park being a single.

I'd go for 'Numb' or 'Integral'.

E-Mail Vampire · #23 Post by **E-Mail Vampire** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 10:09 pm

Luna Park would be a mistake as a single.

IMO Numb should be the third single with Integral as a possible 4th.

transforce · #24 Post by **transforce** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 10:45 pm

I'm going to say Numb. I love integral, but I think Numb is better placed for chart success. If they really are still considering Sodom, then I'd go for that.

Blockhead · #25 Post by **Blockhead** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 10:53 pm

dannii wrote:
Technotrancemix wrote:Integral has what it takes for a single release. The others don't and are too long to have a Radio Edit for 3:30 minutes.
don't let it fool you!
I get along (album version) is 6 minutes long and yet they managed to make 4 minutes long edit

and there's even a 3.33 version of I get along

3rd single - Numb

kennym · #26 Post by **kennym** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 11:15 pm

Integral remixed by Richard X could be huge.

Lleonard Pler · #27 Post by **Lleonard Pler** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 11:25 pm

Why don't they release 'God Willing (Tiga's Boring Dub)' as a single?

Chuiperdu · #28 Post by **Chuiperdu** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 11:39 pm

I never understood how Numb could be considered as a single. Eldritch point is valid though it is sort of a non PSB single so it *potentially* could have an impact on non PSB fan...but hey..would Aerosmith fan buy Fundamental ???

Luna Park is a grower... but as playlists on radio stations are based on first impressions, I don't think it would be successfull.

Integral could be a good choice. Quite catchy for the masses

. I would prefer TSAGS though.

But let's face the facts...if there is an internationally released third single (remember London only released in Germany

) this would indicates a real iimprovement...and that would makes me happy.

Nickname · #29 Post by **Nickname** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 11:39 pm

BrilliantPSB wrote:I forgot to mention that SODOM is STILL being considered....

Really?. I love SODOM.

We don't have the same source, then.

profile790 · #30 Post by **profile790** » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 11:58 pm

Gawd, what an awful selection to pick from. Luna Park is the *most* album track on the album, Numb is nor catchy, nor written by PSB... - Integral... well, at least it's uptempo, and a typical PSB track.