In Private - Tomcraft 7"

Message

Burj · #16 Post by **Burj** » Thu 06 Jul 2006, 6:15 pm

But we don't know when IP was recorded.

! · #17 Post by ! » Thu 06 Jul 2006, 6:51 pm

Burj wrote:But we don't know when IP was recorded.

I think I read it was recorded Christmas 2003. I'm not 100% certain though. Anyway, I quite like Tomcraft and I'd like to see who else has remixed it, if there are anymore mixers that is and not just Tomcraft/Stuart Crichton, and what the mixes are!

TheGardner · #18 Post by **TheGardner** » Thu 06 Jul 2006, 7:12 pm

Have the feeling it's a typo in the end! Guess there's the 'Crichton' 7" on it and we don't will see the 'Tomcraft' one soon.

DJAMIX · #19 Post by **DJAMIX** » Fri 07 Jul 2006, 1:38 pm

I'll wait for the official promo with a nice sleeve, just like the blu arrow I'm with stupid.

a powerful friend · Fri 07 Jul 2006, 7:27 pm

Official promo cd sleeve?

same tracklist as the promo CDR and has a catalogue number of 0094637114421 / 3711442

DJAMIX · #21 Post by **DJAMIX** » Fri 07 Jul 2006, 8:49 pm

a powerful friend wrote:Official promo cd sleeve?

same tracklist as the promo CDR and has a catalogue number of 0094637114421 / 3711442

Ok, my wait is over...

It seems that's the "Parlophone guy"...

Paul · #22 Post by **Paul** » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 5:03 pm

Its worse than the Stuart Crichton club mix !!

Cant understand how the Pet Shop Boys can ok such total crap ?

Tomas · #23 Post by **Tomas** » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 5:31 pm

a powerful friend wrote:Official promo cd sleeve?

Isn't it strange this and the "eBay promo" have each a different layout / text information?

On the picture above, there's a gap above the tenth track, and two columns.

On the picture below (eBay), there's only one column and no gaps in the tracklist. And even if the picture below would be front cover, then where are the "Minimal" letters, as on the item above? I suspect that the current eBay item is fake...?

! · #24 Post by ! » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 10:51 pm

Paul wrote:Its worse than the Stuart Crichton club mix !!

I (highly) doubt that!

I <3 Tomcraft

Paul · #25 Post by **Paul** » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 11:07 pm

! wrote:
Paul wrote:Its worse than the Stuart Crichton club mix !!
I (highly) doubt that!

I <3 Tomcraft

Believe me surprisingly it is

Technotrancemix · Sun 09 Jul 2006, 11:15 pm

Tomas wrote:Isn't it strange this and the "eBay promo" have each a different layout / text information?

Not strange at all. You can't have a promotional pressed CD looking exactly like a pre-promo CD-R.

Henrik Powers · #27 Post by **Henrik Powers** » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 11:29 pm

! wrote:
Paul wrote:Its worse than the Stuart Crichton club mix !!
I (highly) doubt that!

I <3 Tomcraft

This song (both versions) is certainly one of the worst PSB song ever and the tomcraft version is quite horrible!

BlueSwan · #28 Post by **BlueSwan** » Mon 10 Jul 2006, 9:48 am

! wrote:
Paul wrote:Its worse than the Stuart Crichton club mix !!
I (highly) doubt that!

I <3 Tomcraft

It's true. It's probably the worst PSB-related track ever released. Utterly tuneless.

JSDOUVRES · #29 Post by **JSDOUVRES** » Mon 10 Jul 2006, 10:38 am

I listened to the original version of the track recently and then listened to the new mixes of it and it is fair to say that they have absolutely murdered this track. Imagine if they did something like this to rent for example.
I just don't understand the logic of these versions especially with it being with Elton John!

DaddyMac · #30 Post by **DaddyMac** » Mon 10 Jul 2006, 12:47 pm

i think the tomcraft mix would probably be ok if it was an instrumental!