Holy sh-, Scissor Sisters do in fact rock..
- Deschanel
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:23 pm
Yes Lush, I'm a freakin' retard that needs these things explained to me.Lush wrote: So, you like the Scisor Sisters. Good for you, but perhaps other people should be granted the option of having a different opinion. Or is that concept too complex for you to grasp?
And of course, you ought to take my description of young SF queers having a blast to mean that, yeah, only their opinions matter to me. No one else's , ever.
You're brilliant. Oh wait, that's Drico, saying only queers' opinions matter to me, willfully ignoring my context. I'm not at all sure you're not a fag-hater btw Drico, so it's pretty nasty of you to assert what you did.
I actually apologized to Rags privately about my intemperate comments to him.
Of course there's no shortage of ill-tempered sorts who love to piss on someone else's good time. SOOOO sorry I tried to post a positive about a song.
YFU Rob, I don't think I broke any laws here, and as i said I privately apologized to Rags. Though it was hardly actionable in a court of law.
Was it "Squatney bedsit" that had you suddenly eager for justice??
Confused, cos we settled it amicably like men and I did apologize, and Rags was a cool gent . And here I have to read you telling everyone that you were thinking of disciplining me.
So Lush, yeah, "good for bloody me" that I posted about liking an SS song- but since bitch negativity is common here, if I decide to reply, it's my business, - I never said everyone has to like it. But try me, push me, if you want to get verbal . Until the nanny steps in.
No actually, it's Drico watching you attack somebody who dares disagree with your supercilious opinions, and then quoting the apparent vindication given to your views by "queers" - your description not mine. Your sense of vindication, not mine.Deschanel wrote:Oh wait, that's Drico, saying only queers' opinions matter to me, willfully ignoring my context.
I am not at all sure you do not hate yourself, Deschanel, but I am not a psychologist, nor am I in the business of judging you. Unlike your good self, I do not use terms like "fag" and "queer", nor do I feel the need to use a form of reverse homophobia on anybody I may disagree with. It must be nice to think people you disagree with hate you but I think you'll find you do not provoke such deep feelings in most people, least of all in me.Deschanel wrote: I'm not at all sure you're not a fag-hater btw Drico, so it's pretty nasty of you to assert what you did.
Drico.

Last edited by Drico One on Tue 13 Apr 2004, 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...
- Your Funny Uncle
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 1:55 am
No it wasn't a big deal, but it was still a personal attack, which goes against forum rules. As I said, if I'd seen it before lush commented on it I'd have sent you a PM, heard that you'd settled your differences with rags and perhaps asked you to edit your post at most. There's no need for this to turn into a big fight.Deschanel wrote: YFU Rob, I don't think I broke any laws here, and as i said I privately apologized to Rags. Though it was hardly actionable in a court of law.
Was it "Squatney bedsit" that had you suddenly eager for justice??
Let's stop it here. No need for this thread to turn into a bitch fest.