Wow! Good to know, thanks!tottenhammattspurs wrote: Sat 16 May 2026, 6:42 pm “86” comes from restaurants. To be precise, TGI Fridays. We used it so the kitchen could let the front of house know that something has run out. For example, guacamole for fajitas. Once restocked it would be “68”. The whole thing came from a (made up) story that someone committed suicide from the 86th floor of the Empire State Building but the strength of the wind blew them back into the 68th floor window.
Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
- Sandy Shaw
- Posts: 4968
- Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
I had to Google this incident to understand your post!MikeyC wrote: Sat 16 May 2026, 7:23 am I was recently thinking about New York city boy since a news event (at least in the U.S.) made a lyric stand out… The former head of the FBI was indicted and arrested for a photo he put on social media last year while on vacation: it showed seashells on a beach spelling out ‘86 47’. The convicted felon’s department of justice managed to get a grand jury to indict Comey for that. (They say you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.) I mainly use the term ‘86’ when I sing along to these lyrics:
‘If you don’t get that mix
it’s gone eighty-six.’
Apparently the term originated in restaurants meaning ‘to remove’ a dish that was no longer selling.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70vzj1nrddo
I'm your puppet
- ype
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sun 01 Apr 2012, 2:41 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
What I really liked about New York city boy is that it seemed like the most gigantic single release ever. Just endless streams of cd-singles, promo's, 12"s, 12"-promo's - I love that 4x12" box, even if I don't like the song that much :-p
Much the same went for I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more btw, and to a lesser extent Drunk. I miss those multi-format days.
Much the same went for I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more btw, and to a lesser extent Drunk. I miss those multi-format days.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Damn, I didn't know there was a 4x12" set. I have 4 separate 12" (12RDJ) of it. Are the tracks essentially the same as the set? How did I miss that?!!!ype wrote: Mon 18 May 2026, 4:26 pm What I really liked about New York city boy is that it seemed like the most gigantic single release ever. Just endless streams of cd-singles, promo's, 12"s, 12"-promo's - I love that 4x12" box, even if I don't like the song that much :-p
Much the same went for I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more btw, and to a lesser extent Drunk. I miss those multi-format days.
EDIT: Just checked Discogs and looks like they are the same mixes of the 4 individual 12" I have, just all together in a set. The track times are a bit off (a lot off in some cases) but I take Discogs info like that with a grain of salt.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more (Give Anymore) got a heapload of mixes because of the separate and later US release.ype wrote: Mon 18 May 2026, 4:26 pm What I really liked about New York city boy is that it seemed like the most gigantic single release ever. Just endless streams of cd-singles, promo's, 12"s, 12"-promo's - I love that 4x12" box, even if I don't like the song that much :-p
Much the same went for I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more btw, and to a lesser extent Drunk. I miss those multi-format days.
I learned to play NYC Boy on the piano, nothing fancy, just the melody. A nice tune. My guess is many of you dislike New York city boy mostly because of its connotations but try to listen to the tune.
And btw I heard YMCA on the radio in the car the other day.... damn that's a great song. It took me years to get over the cringe.... but it turned out it was me who needed to mature. So grow up people!
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
- Lleonard Pler
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
After Footsteps, are we going through the whole Further Listening of Nightlife? That'll be such a slog, as bsides of that era may be the very worst of their career, with only 3-4 worth reviewing.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

Yeah I can understand peoples frustration. There's an element of "unnecessary" about NYC, and they maybe doubled down a bit too much here. But on the positives:
- Fairly huge in USA clubs. Seemed to be a concerted effort to crack the American mainstream again, no luck but worth a try
- on its own, it has enormous sweetness IMO. The sweeping strings and the vibes are terrific
- everyone probably disagrees, but I still appreciate the shift from harder clubbing into more poignant and theatrical territory on Nightlife
-
rathound
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
just watched the video for it back. How did they make it so....ugly? It's like a charmless version of Was it Worth it? (which was ace) at the end in Studio 54, and the rest is just wretched.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
oh my, watching the video again brings me nothing but joyrathound wrote: Tue 19 May 2026, 11:58 am just watched the video for it back. How did they make it so....ugly? It's like a charmless version of Was it Worth it? (which was ace) at the end in Studio 54, and the rest is just wretched.
it's got that 90s over-rich feel, maybe also filmed for the US color system?
It's set in the 70s, so ofc it's a bit tacky, but it's also fun and sweet?
Neil over acts. I've never seen someone walk down a street so awkwardly in my life
-
davidctecno
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun 30 May 2010, 8:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Track 121 : Footsteps
Chronology: Nightlife, Track 12
Song with classic choruses more in the style of Take That than Pet Shop Boys. A careful production for a song that is too calm and atypical to end the album.
Chronology: Nightlife, Track 12
Song with classic choruses more in the style of Take That than Pet Shop Boys. A careful production for a song that is too calm and atypical to end the album.
-
Capsigrany
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
A nice track to end an album like Nightlife. It’s athmospheric in a good way.
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Pretty good track. I can see the Take That style now that you mention it.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Footsteps is one of my least favourite PSB tracks ever.
I'm trying to be kind here, but I just cannot tolerate it.
Just not a foot person
I'm trying to be kind here, but I just cannot tolerate it.
Just not a foot person
- Lleonard Pler
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
It took me years to appreciate it. But now I like it. I wouldn't pick it for listening but it's a good closure for the album. After all the thumping and tension of the previous tracks, here we find the main character of For your own good being serene and reassured by the simple sound of his lover's footsteps. An unlikely (and self-convinced) "happy" ending after all the songs that preceded it. To my ears the melody is like a lullaby.
-
Sammy Jenkis
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat 18 Oct 2025, 6:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Having been a bit unimpressed by the run of tracks leading up to this, I like this one. Would have beena bit embarrassed to admit thus a while back as it seemed to be a lightning rod for criticism but I think this is a durable tune with a well crafted lyric and an interesting balance between peril and reassurance,.