Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
ype
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun 01 Apr 2012, 2:41 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1921 Post by ype »

"I'm longing to seeeeee you" - I've loved this track from day one. To my ears it's gorgeous and the best song on the album.

User avatar
Birthday Boy
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri 20 Dec 2024, 11:13 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1922 Post by Birthday Boy »

I love Footsteps, never understood the dislike for it among Pet Shop Boys fans. I find it really beautiful - the words, the melody, the certain sense of fear combined with a reassuring quality - and no one will ever convince me otherwise. Probably.

Sure, it's no Jealousy or King's Cross, but on the second half of Nightlife, this is definitely by far my favourite track. I do look forward to it every time I play the album.

rathound
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1923 Post by rathound »

It's ok. as above but slightly less enthusiastic. It's the best song on there from Radiophonic onwards but it's certainly not a classic and could have been a lot better. Maybe I was always still grumpy from listening to New York city boy before it whenever I approached it in the past :)

User avatar
Morse
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat 17 Feb 2024, 10:54 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1924 Post by Morse »

I love everything about Footsteps - the orchestration, the mood, the warmth, the lyrics - everything.

Such a good album closer and I'm surprised they didn't perform it at Obscure as a closer.

I've always loved Craig Armstrong, too.

User avatar
jasonjohn
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 12:10 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1925 Post by jasonjohn »

Ties in directly to the opener..... Will the lover come home from the clubs, to the lover they need? Will we hear his footsteps?

It's a very thematic album

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3572
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1926 Post by leesmapman »

Really looking forward to the b-sides of this era

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-A528B met Tapatalk


NOBODY75
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1927 Post by NOBODY75 »

I'm not a huge fan of FootSteps. But at least their sound fits the album better than Boy Strange and The Only One. I've been surprised by the lack of affection many fans here have for New York city boy. Perhaps it's a song that will appeal more to casual fans or even non-fans than to hardcore fans

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1928 Post by Drico One »

By New York City boy they had - like all great pop acts - long since become a parody of themselves. In the 1980s, the parody was of an urbane, slightly sleazy, hyperliterate wallflower skulking around streetscapes with his mute, cooler mate under cover of darkness. You could take that on whatever level you liked. But by Rent this image was set in stone. See Raw Sex or Flight of the Conchords.

By 1999, the parody had changed. Now, it was of male voice choirs, disco pastiche, and cabaret camp.

Their problem was the later parody was less intriguing or interesting than the first, more exclusive, and less cool.

On its own terms, New York City boy is a fun track. Performed by a quasi-heritage act, it seemed a little weird. But when even Dale Winton is claiming it's too gay for his National Lottery show, you've probably jumped the shark in a feather boa to a disco beat. That said, what a prude era that was.

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1929 Post by Drico One »

By the way, New York City boy appears on the forthcoming Now Yearbook 1999.

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

User avatar
Kompakt&Bijou
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon 28 Oct 2024, 7:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1930 Post by Kompakt&Bijou »

Drico One wrote: Wed 20 May 2026, 11:38 pm By New York City boy they had - like all great pop acts - long since become a parody of themselves. In the 1980s, the parody was of an urbane, slightly sleazy, hyperliterate wallflower skulking around streetscapes with his mute, cooler mate under cover of darkness. You could take that on whatever level you liked. But by Rent this image was set in stone. See Raw Sex or Flight of the Conchords.

By 1999, the parody had changed. Now, it was of male voice choirs, disco pastiche, and cabaret camp.

Their problem was the later parody was less intriguing or interesting than the first, more exclusive, and less cool.

On its own terms, New York City boy is a fun track. Performed by a quasi-heritage act, it seemed a little weird. But when even Dale Winton is claiming it's too gay for his National Lottery show, you've probably jumped the shark in a feather boa to a disco beat. That said, what a prude era that was.

Drico.
:up:
... my dear Mostyn :eh:

User avatar
Xakrij
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue 13 Dec 2016, 1:11 am
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1931 Post by Xakrij »

Who's to say that the footsteps in the dark aren't the lover tip-toeing down the hall to go back to the club/out to meet a tryst/score some drugs after his partner has gone to bed?
Shot in the fatal cause 'of frock-and-droll'

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1932 Post by NotInvisible »

Footsteps is execrable, although “waves against a ramshackle pier” is a brilliant lyric. Bilingual was their first real miss-step (all of you Absolutely fabulous haters are dead wrong), but Nightlife is their nadir. It speaks to how talented they are that we still got a few good songs out of it, but the ‘80s genius is well behind us.

Thank god for Release, reinvention, and finally the Fundamental-onward second wind of brilliance.

ahafan02
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri 30 Dec 2005, 12:22 am

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1933 Post by ahafan02 »

NotInvisible wrote: Sat 23 May 2026, 4:41 am Footsteps is execrable, although “waves against a ramshackle pier” is a brilliant lyric. Bilingual was their first real miss-step (all of you Absolutely fabulous haters are dead wrong), but Nightlife is their nadir. It speaks to how talented they are that we still got a few good songs out of it, but the ‘80s genius is well behind us.

Thank god for Release, reinvention, and finally the Fundamental-onward second wind of brilliance.
I disagree. Bilingual was brilliant. Nightlife/Release were their lost in the wilderness years.

Disco.
Posts: 2467
Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1934 Post by Disco. »

Bilingual is excellent.

Dreamland
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun 15 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1935 Post by Dreamland »

NotInvisible wrote: Sat 23 May 2026, 4:41 am Footsteps is execrable, although “waves against a ramshackle pier” is a brilliant lyric. Bilingual was their first real miss-step (all of you Absolutely fabulous haters are dead wrong), but Nightlife is their nadir. It speaks to how talented they are that we still got a few good songs out of it, but the ‘80s genius is well behind us.

Thank god for Release, reinvention, and finally the Fundamental-onward second wind of brilliance.
It’s really not. Nightlife is an excellent album, packed full of great songs. It’s in my top 5 PSB albums.

Post Reply