XXXX '06? (best SINGLE for a reissue..)
- skyhigh
- Posts: 3000
- Joined: Thu 29 Jul 2004, 10:48 pm
- Contact:
- gomorrah
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun 28 May 2006, 4:57 pm
thanks! these aren't official, right? I don't see them on the official site products section. I just see the extended mix (which I've heard - with the long guitar riff toward the end; the track is 10:40 mins long). and I see something called the BB remix. I shall have to find these two that you mentioned!Ronald42 wrote:The remix by Julian Mendelsohn with the LOOOOOONG breakgomorrah wrote:two?! I've only heard one extended mix (with the guitar riff).Ronald42 wrote: We have 2 already. Perhaps a 2006 version of We...All...Feel better...In the dark
The remix by Marshall Jefferson with the LOOOOOONG intro
I wooooooooooooooood if I cooooooood...
-
One of the crowd
- Posts: 4796
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm
Only two?karmavore wrote:I own two copies of Fundemental. Lick my reissued, remixed, and re-released balls.
Yes, the new stuff is great, but they'll never recapture the magic of Please-Very. Never.
Was P'95 a bad idea? Was West End girls '85 a bad idea (it hit #1 you know)?
Lucas.
Paninaro was remixed because of Alternative. IMO, it should have been left alone but that was 11 years back now.
West End girls was a completely different kettle of fish. The track had potential and needed to be re-recorded to get that first hit.
I think it lacks creativity and idea if they remix and re-release an old track just for the sake of it. The lads churn out quality material time after time and should feel no need to re-issue and older stuff.
However, remixing old stuff for bonus CD tracks is fine with me. I would love to see studio versions of the live versions that they do but I cant ever see it happening.
I'll go now, Carry on.
