Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4979
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#46 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Oznerol wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2024, 7:07 pm So there is an edit of 3:48, and extended of 6:20 and a Superextended of 8:17? Are those three official mixes?

Also the instrumental, altough I don´t count that as a "collaboration" ;)
They are official, yes.
I'm your puppet

User avatar
oakey
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013, 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#47 Post by oakey »

Making a contemporary remix of a classic is rarely a good idea (DoA You Spin Me Round 1994, 2000, 2010, 2030, 2040 anyone? Or the countless Bananarama Venus or Gloria Gaynor I will survive remixes and remakes?). It certainly isn't in this case either (despite the good intentions, no doubt). Just listen to the original instead of this pointless remake.

Sorry, but I really do not like it.

User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3904
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#48 Post by daveid »

oakey wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2024, 8:54 pm Making a contemporary remix of a classic is rarely a good idea (DoA You Spin Me Round 1994, 2000, 2010, 2030, 2040 anyone? Or the countless Bananarama Venus or Gloria Gaynor I will survive remixes and remakes). It certainly isn't in this case (despite the good intentions, no doubt). Just listen to the original instead of this pointless remake.

Sorry, but I really do not like it.
Agree. This daft remix only strengthens the brilliance of the original. There is nothing new on offer. Boring generic sounds you can hear on any dance record from the past 20 years and Neil speaking a few lines that are nothing but pretentious filler.

User avatar
jasonjohn
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 12:10 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#49 Post by jasonjohn »

Well all that may have some truth, but there's something to be said for remixing a song to fit in with all the other boring generic sounds that are on a modern DJs setlist. It's a way to get plays and pull younger audiences to your back catalogue. And Neil's addition is kinda cool, imo.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#50 Post by Gabby »

It's not my cup of tea, leaning into a "dull, soulless dance music" version of a great song. I wouldn't have minded it if all the verses and lyrics were intact along with Neil's spoken word additions.

Stripped back like it is, 3 minutes is quite enough.

User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4979
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#51 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Gabby wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2024, 3:24 pm It's not my cup of tea, leaning into a "dull, soulless dance music" version of a great song. I wouldn't have minded it if all the verses and lyrics were intact along with Neil's spoken word additions.

Stripped back like it is, 3 minutes is quite enough.
Try the extra long version just once, you may be pleasantly surprised!
I'm your puppet

User avatar
df118junkie
Posts: 891
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 5:04 am

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#52 Post by df118junkie »

Sandy Shaw wrote: Sun 11 Aug 2024, 5:57 pm
Gabby wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2024, 3:24 pm It's not my cup of tea, leaning into a "dull, soulless dance music" version of a great song. I wouldn't have minded it if all the verses and lyrics were intact along with Neil's spoken word additions.

Stripped back like it is, 3 minutes is quite enough.
Try the extra long version just once, you may be pleasantly surprised!
Agreed. It makes much more sense in the super extended version. I normally can't stand Superchumbo mixes, but this actually works.

moebius
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 9:32 pm

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#53 Post by moebius »

Hello!
I didn’t find anywhere the “Superextended mix”of 8:17.
I didn’t find on the BeatPort site.
Anyone can give me a way tu heard this remix?
Thanks 🙏🏻

User avatar
ChoonHound
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#54 Post by ChoonHound »

Image


WTF is “indie Dance” and why is it this and not Saint Etienne, New Order, etc.
I sincerely *love* Disco 2 and listen to it straight through regularly.

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4092
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#55 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
ChoonHound wrote: Mon 26 Aug 2024, 1:23 am WTF is “indie Dance” and why is it this and not Saint Etienne, New Order, etc.
Because it comes at it from the dance music side, rather than the indie side.

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

User avatar
ChoonHound
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#56 Post by ChoonHound »

Huh? That makes no sense.
I sincerely *love* Disco 2 and listen to it straight through regularly.

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4092
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#57 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
ChoonHound wrote: Mon 26 Aug 2024, 1:57 am Huh? That makes no sense.
Yes it does.

If you're an "indie" person, and you think of "indie dance" you'll think of indie acts who have a dance flavour about them, but it's still indie music, and therefore a sub-genre of indie.

If you're a "dance" person, and you think of "indie dance" you'll think of "dance music" that has an indie flavour about it, but it's still dance music, and therefore a sub-genre of dance.

Those two are quite a long way away from each other. Stores like Beatport that cater to DJs will naturally interpret it in the second way, not the first.

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

User avatar
raggatwin
Posts: 4184
Joined: Thu 18 Dec 2003, 4:31 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#58 Post by raggatwin »

i don't consider indie dance to be dance music at all...Fools Gold is a great song as is some of the Mondays stuff...but its not dance music
Hello my name is Neil Tennant and I'm Chris Lowe and we're of the Pet Shop Boys.

User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4979
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#59 Post by Sandy Shaw »

moebius wrote: Sun 25 Aug 2024, 10:46 pm Hello!
I didn’t find anywhere the “Superextended mix”of 8:17.
I didn’t find on the BeatPort site.
Anyone can give me a way tu heard this remix?
Thanks 🙏🏻
I found it in less than a second via a well-known search engine!
https://www.beatport.com/search?q=Brons ... b5N5vammQn

Direct link to the mix:

https://www.beatport.com/release/why-fe ... ix/4664641
I'm your puppet

User avatar
dgraysn
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:54 pm

Re: Bronski Beat - Why? (Superchumbo remix ft. Neil Tennant)

#60 Post by dgraysn »

just checked those links, looks like the 8:17 mix is no longer available :(
"Steely Blue eyes with no love in them, Scan The World" STOP BUSH

http://www.fotolog.net/dgraysn/

Post Reply