Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Nickname
Posts: 7895
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#571 Post by Nickname »

Pet Shop Boys vs Alexa:
https://twitter.com/petshopboys/status/ ... 3667804162

From the official site account on Twitter.

User avatar
minimal
Posts: 706
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 11:46 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#572 Post by minimal »

Do both smash t-shirts (actually artwork and pointy hats) have written SMASH on their back? That wasn’t clear from the depiction in the official store. Thank you.

m+

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3588
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#573 Post by leesmapman »

That Alexa commercial was pretty funny :-D

User avatar
Ewok
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:58 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#574 Post by Ewok »

Oznerol wrote: Sun 18 Jun 2023, 11:45 pm
Ewok wrote: Sun 18 Jun 2023, 10:15 pm On SMASH they also revisited the original Go West single edit. On the 2001 reissue, PopArt und Ultimate there's a slight difference at 4:24 just before the instrumental bit.
You got me trapped here! maybe do you mean the "album version"? because there is no "single edit" on the 2001 reissue..right? And I always thought that the album and the usual single version (I mean not some of the rare edits on the US cassette or Japanese promo CDs..) were the same...aren´t they??
I just compared the "PopArt" version with the original album and what I see is that there was a sudden "up" in volume on the original just before the instrumental part...to make it sound louder on the original album/single versions, but it remains quieter on PopArt..is that the difference you mean? I never noticed that before...
Yes, that's what I meant. And of course the single version (aka "'Edit") is identical to the album version.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2122
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#575 Post by telys »

TwizzleUK wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 3:03 pm
telys wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
TwizzleUK wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 12:51 pm
Could just be a mistiming on Geowayne's part. Discogs shows the original 7" and the 7" version on the original CD single both as 3:59:
https://www.discogs.com/release/83738-P ... On-My-Mind
https://www.discogs.com/release/109197- ... On-My-Mind
Still doesn't explain the 4:10 version on SMASH.
Shows as 4:04 on my version of Smash, not 4:10
Sorry, it's a 4:05-version on my player... which makes everything more confusing. There's a 3:55, a 4:05 and apparently a 4:10 version.
Anyway, the major point is that SMASH CD1 is not a copy of Discography, changes have been made, either in the remastering or in the choice of 7''-versions available from the sources.
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#576 Post by Undertaker »

It's number 3 in the midweek chart. 7,000 sales.

User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4720
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#577 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

minimal wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 4:57 pm Do both smash t-shirts (actually artwork and pointy hats) have written SMASH on their back? That wasn’t clear from the depiction in the official store. Thank you.

m+
Yes. And I'm quite annoyed by it as I won't wear it now.
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4720
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#578 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

Undertaker wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 5:28 pm It's number 3 in the midweek chart. 7,000 sales.
7000 sales gets you a number three position??? By God these new popstars would have floundered in the 80s....

Sophie Ellis Bextor was three in the midweeks and ended up at 8 so that's a decent indication....
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
minimal
Posts: 706
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 11:46 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#579 Post by minimal »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 5:52 pm
minimal wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 4:57 pm Do both smash t-shirts (actually artwork and pointy hats) have written SMASH on their back? That wasn’t clear from the depiction in the official store. Thank you.

m+
Yes. And I'm quite annoyed by it as I won't wear it now.
Thank you but sad too hear that as I won’t buy any of these now.

It’s ridiculously ugly and annoying. The front print would do.

m+

Disco.
Posts: 2477
Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#580 Post by Disco. »

7219 sales so far. (U.K.)

User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4986
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#581 Post by Sandy Shaw »

Jeez the remasters are good. Wish we could get 2023 for the whole catalogue..
I'm guessing that the remasters were:
Done by a musician, possibly classicaly trained
He's young and was very young or not around when the Pets started their career!

I could be very wrong of course!!!
Last edited by Sandy Shaw on Mon 19 Jun 2023, 8:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I'm your puppet

User avatar
DopeFiend
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat 27 Mar 2021, 10:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#582 Post by DopeFiend »

I love the Alexa animation! It needs more credit here.
Guys, Neil and Chris voiced a short little animation!
It's them speaking to an Alexa assistant thing. Goes for 30 seconds.
It's been posted on Instragram and Facebook. (As well as Twitter as previously mentioned)
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CtrRZMPgpdM/
https://www.facebook.com/reel/130578210054030

Image

User avatar
Oznerol
Posts: 2412
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 5:31 am

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#583 Post by Oznerol »

telys wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 11:33 am ...., Was it worth it? also has a longer fade out.
...
It´s not just a longer fade out! this is a slightly differente "edit" of the song.
After the final beakdown, the previous versions were:

...music..."i don´t know why"...short music... "I never thought I'd fall in love/Idon´t know why"...music.... etc

But on Smash:

...music..."i don´t know why"...music..."i don´t know why"...short music... "I never thought I'd fall in love/Idon´t know why"...music.. etc

In other words, the first "I don´t know why" verse is repeated twice on Smash after the breakdown, and just once on the previous single/album versions...
That makes you think about how many slight variants of each song are stored on the Parlophone vaults!!
This is not my signature.

misterme
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon 04 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
Contact:

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#584 Post by misterme »

Yes, and likewise we might have the "action man" part of "I don't know what you want..." reinstated by mistake on a future release, who knows ? :P

TwizzleUK
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri 24 Feb 2006, 11:22 pm

Re: Smash - The Singles 1985 - 2020

#585 Post by TwizzleUK »

telys wrote: Mon 19 Jun 2023, 5:20 pm Sorry, it's a 4:05-version on my player... which makes everything more confusing. There's a 3:55, a 4:05 and apparently a 4:10 version.
Thing is, these aren't different "versions" as I would think of them. I'll assume there's no 4:10 version, as I've no evidence of it. The other timings are simply 4-6 seconds shorter or longer than the original 3:59 CD single. The song fades out, so it's simply the same "version" of the song, but ever so slightly longer or shorter depending on when the engineer mastering each release decided to end the fade out. The track's so quiet at that point in the track, hardly any listeners would be likely to notice any difference.
Last edited by TwizzleUK on Tue 20 Jun 2023, 7:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply