He may have, but not formally in an interview. That's the difference.Henrik Powers wrote:Is it really that suprising.... i mean didn't he talk about it before???
-Zog
He did heavily hint in that direction on the About CD, as an example though.Zog wrote:He may have, but not formally in an interview. That's the difference.Henrik Powers wrote:Is it really that suprising.... i mean didn't he talk about it before???
-Zog
Yeah.... The only difference is that he said it more clearly this time.Acelera wrote:He did heavily hint in that direction on the About CD, as an example though.Zog wrote:He may have, but not formally in an interview. That's the difference.Henrik Powers wrote:Is it really that suprising.... i mean didn't he talk about it before???
-Zog
There's been other occasions before and after that, too.
Oh, I don't know...I don't see why anyone should be obliged to announce their sexuality one way or the other, just as they are not obliged to announce (for instance) whether or not they are vegetarian, or what underwear they have on. As long as they are, it will continue to be a big deal to some people.jamie1978 wrote:Jesus, about bloody time.
I must confess I was getting a little bored of Chris's embarrasing denial/ambiguity regarding his sexuality.
Good to see that he has finally grown up regarding the issue.
I think Neil's Attitude interview was far more embarrassing than Chris' stance who simply is an introvert and uncomfortable to speak in public, especially about his private life.jamie1978 wrote: I must confess I was getting a little bored of Chris's embarrasing denial/ambiguity regarding his sexuality.
Yeah, but Chris always made an issue out of it, by refusing to discuss it and coming up with bizarre 'theories' that it was really strange how we defined people by their sexuality.Jack wrote:Oh, I don't know...I don't see why anyone should be obliged to announce their sexuality one way or the other, just as they are not obliged to announce (for instance) whether or not they are vegetarian, or what underwear they have on. As long as they are, it will continue to be a big deal to some people.jamie1978 wrote:Jesus, about bloody time.
I must confess I was getting a little bored of Chris's embarrasing denial/ambiguity regarding his sexuality.
Good to see that he has finally grown up regarding the issue.
I'm sure that Chris' friends and family have been aware of his sexuality for sometime, and as for everyone else, it's none of their business frankly.
Perhaps there should be a space under each persons avatar on this website: sexuality.
Ah fair enough. I can't really judge that either way not being gay myself.jamie1978 wrote:Yeah, but Chris always made an issue out of it, by refusing to discuss it and coming up with bizarre 'theories' that it was really strange how we defined people by their sexuality.Jack wrote:Oh, I don't know...I don't see why anyone should be obliged to announce their sexuality one way or the other, just as they are not obliged to announce (for instance) whether or not they are vegetarian, or what underwear they have on. As long as they are, it will continue to be a big deal to some people.jamie1978 wrote:Jesus, about bloody time.
I must confess I was getting a little bored of Chris's embarrasing denial/ambiguity regarding his sexuality.
Good to see that he has finally grown up regarding the issue.
I'm sure that Chris' friends and family have been aware of his sexuality for sometime, and as for everyone else, it's none of their business frankly.
Perhaps there should be a space under each persons avatar on this website: sexuality.
I see gay guys like him all the time - concerned about how their sexuality impacts on other peoples perceptions of them. To the exent that they basically deny it, in a completely implausible manner.
It´s because of my computer. If I copy that interview to word pad it doesn´t print the text just blank page. I´ve tried dozens of times.Pani wrote:Pepe said that it's been an oldpsb-freak wrote:And... any scans, please ?
PopArt promo picture, nothing
new to us ...
Ehm, does this matters at all? I'm absolutely not interested in this topic and I think most people already knew. Why would I bother about his sexuality and everything connected with it? It's his private thing and he don't need telling us. Maybe not since 1986 but I think it wasn't too much of a enigma.psb-freak wrote:I´m really happy that Chris has finally started to talk about his sexuality openly. Maybe now we could hear some things from the past too.