Andy has HIV. Chris doesn't. So to claim that antiretroviral drugs may have affected Andy's looks requires far less proof than to suggest that that is true of Chris.pulse wrote:Look how you got your hair in a tangle when you assumed homer1972 was personally insulting Chris. Why is that different? Earlier on, some of you were alluding to Andy's appearance being as a result of HIV but that's totally OK, isn't it?
I don't expect you to get that there's a difference there, but trust me: there is.
This thread was started by an Erasure fan who has been banned from the Erasure forum at least once, and is already well on his way to being banned from there again. I don't see how you can blame the resident PSB fans for his behaviour, but I guess that's your l o g i c at work again.pulse wrote:Such hypocrites - it really is disgusting. If you want a prime example of trouble-making, the only reason this very thread exists is for a small handful of you to slam Erasure and then cry like babies when someone stands up to you.
Paranoia too. How sadpulse wrote:And talking about troublemakers - you are one of the biggest trouble-makers of them all. Not to mention this small handful of you create alternate egos on other fora just to cause more trouble (and end up paying for it back here). Everyone knows who I am here and I've never been a clandestine about it, unlike the lot of you with your other cowardly incognito accounts.