I have this theory....

Message

Timmy · #1 Post by **Timmy** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 5:31 pm

Beyond my understanding of conventional wisdom and beating about the bush, my understanding has reached a point of Universal conventional wisdom. I think in a form of identity undertaking, conventionally in modern society you have the ideal hypothesis concerning the structure of binary oppositional relationships, my understanding has come to a point where I am thinking Chris Lowe is underpinning an identity of God, and Neil Tennant underpinning the devil. Why have I come to such hasty interpretations? It has to do with my inability to construct a hypothesis concerning social structure manifestations....

Ghost within this house · Sat 01 Apr 2006, 5:41 pm

Timmy wrote:Beyond my understanding of conventional wisdom and beating about the bush, my understanding has reached a point of Universal conventional wisdom. I think in a form of identity undertaking, conventionally in modern society you have the ideal hypothesis concerning the structure of binary oppositional relationships, my understanding has come to a point where I am thinking Chris Lowe is underpinning an identity of God, and Neil Tennant underpinning the devil. Why have I come to such hasty interpretations? It has to do with my inability to construct a hypothesis concerning social structure manifestations....

stay at home. This is my house

ArseSpanker · #3 Post by **ArseSpanker** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 5:42 pm

But social structures manifest over a period of time, young Timmy. You don't need to totemise the PSB in an attempt to bring forward the institutionalisation of social mores into a social structure where universal values are representerd by the oppositional nature of Neil tennant and Chris Lowe.

We already live in a society where social norms are well represented by other institutions. We don't need your false idols. Besides, it'd go to their heads.

Are you some kind of free thinking anarchist?

Timmy · #4 Post by **Timmy** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 5:52 pm

Err, what.... no as I was saying what you have here is a construction dividing the art of socialisation constructions. That's what I'm saying.

Ghost within this house · Sat 01 Apr 2006, 5:54 pm

While it's true that human beings conventionally view the world in binary, oppositional relationships - as every good Manichean will tell you - we do at least live in a world blest with a much greater array of such dualities..

isn't it a bit tedious to dub them God and the Devil? Much better, the following:

Neil: Chris:
Sun Moon
Guardian Mirror
Bottom Top
truth lies
ale lager
rice chips
cognitivism non-cognitivism
viagra cocaine

Timmy · #6 Post by **Timmy** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 6:02 pm

What is this crap you're talking about...

Timmy · #7 Post by **Timmy** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 6:07 pm

Why is this conventional? You have a binary that is attracting a social group of fans like you and I. But where does this merit to? Are Chris and Neil actually gay, or are they hiding their sexy pretty girlfriends....

b@man · #8 Post by **b@man** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 6:08 pm

Everyone has his own opinion. So everything you said is fine and correct or what????.

So if you don`t understand what someone else wants to express than you could ask:

I don`t understand what you mean could you explain it insted of saying in your third post that someone is talking CRAP.

Timmy · #9 Post by **Timmy** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 6:16 pm

Actually this has gone far enough. My hypothesising has seem to have gone to an overboard standard. I will just discontinue hypothesising... What I meant by my original hypothesis, was a binary controlling social constructions with one side a controller of good, and one side a controller of evil. What then do you have? I was looking for replies from internal social subjects which you all would represent?

bobblekat · #10 Post by **bobblekat** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 6:30 pm

crikey, them drugs must be great!

Ghost within this house · Sat 01 Apr 2006, 7:19 pm

Timmy wrote:Actually this has gone far enough. My hypothesising has seem to have gone to an overboard standard. I will just discontinue hypothesising... What I meant by my original hypothesis, was a binary controlling social constructions with one side a controller of good, and one side a controller of evil. What then do you have? I was looking for replies from internal social subjects which you all would represent?

Someone else wanting to do a Sociology degree but a few tools short of the full kit.

No speak-ee English, Timmy?

What's an overboard standard for chrissakes?

Your Funny Uncle · Sat 01 Apr 2006, 11:45 pm

I spy a Babylon Zoo song...

rags · #13 Post by **rags** » Sat 01 Apr 2006, 11:56 pm

*bang*

Looks like we're gonna need another Timmy!

I have this theory....

I have this theory....

Re: I have this theory....