[removed]

[dannii]

[removed]

[Tau]

I agree...I absolutely love that site too (helped me a lot with finding remixes) but I don't think it's necessary to read every week about polls and results of polls.

[Syncratic]

You obviously haven't checked back to Nickname's polls. They are legendary. This made me giggle though...

I've been checking you all posts, and seems like you're only on this forum to inform us about your polls and that means milions of unnecesary topics

[dannii]

[removed]

[Syncratic]

Just scroll back a few pages. The months from November 05 to February are particularly good. It might go even further back.

[joncool5]

Just scroll back a few pages. The months from November 05 to February are particularly good. It might go even further back.

It could make an interesting book "Waiting for Utopia: An account of a Spanish Pethead".

[One of the crowd]

its quite simple lad, Dont read them.

After all I do ignore the majority of your threads.

[Ghost within this house]

... by this unnecesarry topics about Wayne Studer's polls.

er, dunno, let's have a poll

it just fills this PSB Discussion with no reason

unlike all the other really rational stuff that get's said on this board

the many newcomers to the board at the moment won't know about Wayne's site. Reason enough to keep posting them.

[joncool5]

... by this unnecesarry topics about Wayne Studer's polls.
Don't get me wrong, Wayne's web-site is a masterpiece, it's amazing and I find it ultimately helpful but it really annoys me to find here in PET SHOP BOYS Discussion, every week three topics about only one of his poll.
It means, every week we get three topics about how poll started:
1) poll started
2) poll finishes
3) poll results

and sometimes: 4) delays on poll

isn't it enought that we go on his site and vote
is it really something that can't live without, it just fills this PSB Discussion with no reason
we're all aware of his site and we know the procedure of his polls, so we go there every week and vote if we want...
Wayne, if you're reading this, please don't be offended, I'm only suggesting you to consider this or either get a sticky here only about your polls
Have you noticed that your topics get very little views and almost 0 posts?
Is it saying anything to you?
Thank you for reading this.

Keep up th excellent work with your polls, but just don't let your topics invade this section if it's unnecesary
I'm glad when you inform us about some errors on your site, but these polls - we already know about them
I've been checking you all posts, and seems like you're only on this forum to inform us about your polls and that means milions of unnecesary topics
you should join us in other discussions and participate, not only post about your polls
thank you

P.S.

Don't forget I love his site and I vote there every single week

How long winded is this, you could have explained it in a couple of sentences. I understand your point but there are far more users who are guilty of filling this forum with complete rubbish. Some of your posts verge on this at times too.

[AlfonsoPSB]

... by this unnecesarry topics about Wayne Studer's polls.

1. Not annoyed at all.

it really annoys me to find here in PET SHOP BOYS Discussion, every week three topics about only one of his poll.
It means, every week we get three topics about how poll started:
1) poll started
2) poll finishes
3) poll results

2. Wrong. Every week we get two topics about two of his polls:
1) Final poll results and launching of new poll
2) Poll ends soon

3. Quoting yourself: If you don't like Wayne's topics, you should've just avoid them!

[Flaffer]

if you see one of the posts you find so distressing, ignore them, it's easy enough to do. I find Waynes site interesting and also very original

[AlfonsoPSB]

... by this unnecesarry topics about Wayne Studer's polls.

er, dunno, let's have a poll

the many newcomers to the board at the moment won't know about Wayne's site. Reason enough to keep posting them.

Agree.

[Ghost within this house]

Just scroll back a few pages. The months from November 05 to February are particularly good. It might go even further back.

It could make an interesting book "Waiting for Utopia: An account of a Spanish Pethead".

or 'Nickname: the loneliness of the long-distance pollster'

[the last call]

I don't see the reason for you to pick on his polls. You don't have to vote, and we don't need to see you rubbishing someone's effort, dannii. It is not a bad thing at all, that he is informative.

[dannii]

[removed]