Instrumental delights

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Actually
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006, 11:52 am
Contact:

Instrumental delights

#1 Post by Actually »

Love listening to Pet Shop Boys instrumentals. They bring a new dimension to the listening experience of quality songs.
My best one is More than a dream. The part where "driving through the night, just you and me...."is simply pure musical perfection.

Any chance of the boys releasing ALL their albums in instrumental format??
I'm too weak to be strong

User avatar
Greendrake
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed 29 Oct 2003, 5:56 pm

Re: Instrumental delights

#2 Post by Greendrake »


The content of this post has been reserved by the author due to the unprecedented, categorical and peremptory exercise of censorship that took place on 20 May 2021.

Whereas this content can be restored, the author neither intends to do so, nor to publish any further posts to avoid any possible perception as "passive agressive", "pointless", "unhelpful", "homophobic" or "bigoted".
Last edited by Greendrake on Fri 21 May 2021, 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MikeyC
Posts: 1936
Joined: Sat 07 Oct 2006, 5:28 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Instrumental delights

#3 Post by MikeyC »

Actually wrote: My best one is More than a dream. The part where "driving through the night, just you and me...."is simply pure musical perfection.

I still get chills from that part!! 8)

Bulldog

Re: Instrumental delights

#4 Post by Bulldog »

The instrumental version of Winner is AMAZING.

User avatar
df118junkie
Posts: 891
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 5:04 am

Re: Instrumental delights

#5 Post by df118junkie »

Bulldog wrote:The instrumental version of Winner is AMAZING.
It's certainly the best version :lol:

User avatar
Zog
Posts: 2271
Joined: Wed 29 Oct 2003, 1:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Instrumental delights

#6 Post by Zog »

Even for people who don't like "Hold On", the instrumental version is excellent. It has a slight "Modern Jazz Quartet" feel.

(I'm not into jazz generally, but the MJQ is/was excellent, with their rather stripped-down Bach-like sound, and interesting occasional Chris Lowe-like chord progressions).

-Zog
New Stuff
*** “Back-Track” - Retro Funk Mix (MAS 2018)
https://soundcloud.com/martin-ashwoodsm ... k-mix-2018
*** “Cydonia” - Techno Mix (MAS 2018)
https://soundcloud.com/martin-ashwoodsm ... x-mas-2018

Bulldog

Re: Instrumental delights

#7 Post by Bulldog »

df118junkie wrote:
Bulldog wrote:The instrumental version of Winner is AMAZING.
It's certainly the best version :lol:
I mean it's not the song in itself, it's that Neil sounds really clunky and out of place in the vocal (no pun) mix. Several Elysium tracks, it seems, have that issue, in particular Hold on and Give it a go. His voice works best with booming vocalists like Sylvia, because a lot of the time they just belt out everything, making sound Neil more refined by contrast; but in the context of Elysium, where the backing singers are not that powerful but VERY nuanced (and songwriting moves in that direction too - see Give it a go), the overall effect is sometimes brilliant (Leaving) but mostly kind of redundant and forced. And Neil must have realized that when he pushed EMI to release the bonus cd of instrumentals, though you can say it was a way to admit they weren't that successful with the main aim of the record - i.e. vocal experimentation and a different way of doing vocals than the usual double tracking or Neilatron (remember the album was going to called "Vocal" at some point...).

Tom Angel
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sat 04 Feb 2006, 2:09 pm

Re: Instrumental delights

#8 Post by Tom Angel »

The instrumental I'd most like to hear is Groovy! I LOVE this track more and more, and I'd love to hear more of the instrumentation

I also agree re: Neil singing Winner, it just doesn't really work, but the track is otherwise lush.
in suits or sequins/or twin sets and pearls

Palpatine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sat 27 Mar 2004, 5:39 pm

Re: Instrumental delights

#9 Post by Palpatine »

Tom Angel wrote:The instrumental I'd most like to hear is Groovy! I LOVE this track more and more, and I'd love to hear more of the instrumentation

I also agree re: Neil singing Winner, it just doesn't really work, but the track is otherwise lush.
Totally agree about Groovy and Winner. I wish they'd release instrumentals of all albums.

Paninaro
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat 12 Jan 2013, 7:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Instrumental delights

#10 Post by Paninaro »

After we had the special vinyl release of the instrumentals from Yes, the special edition of Elysium with an instrumentals disc, and all the instrumentals of the Electric singles... why none whatsoever from Super?

User avatar
df118junkie
Posts: 891
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 5:04 am

Re: Instrumental delights

#11 Post by df118junkie »

Bulldog wrote:
df118junkie wrote:
Bulldog wrote:The instrumental version of Winner is AMAZING.
It's certainly the best version :lol:
I mean it's not the song in itself, it's that Neil sounds really clunky and out of place in the vocal (no pun) mix. Several Elysium tracks, it seems, have that issue, in particular Hold on and Give it a go. His voice works best with booming vocalists like Sylvia, because a lot of the time they just belt out everything, making sound Neil more refined by contrast; but in the context of Elysium, where the backing singers are not that powerful but VERY nuanced (and songwriting moves in that direction too - see Give it a go), the overall effect is sometimes brilliant (Leaving) but mostly kind of redundant and forced. And Neil must have realized that when he pushed EMI to release the bonus cd of instrumentals, though you can say it was a way to admit they weren't that successful with the main aim of the record - i.e. vocal experimentation and a different way of doing vocals than the usual double tracking or Neilatron (remember the album was going to called "Vocal" at some point...).
I agree. I find the lyrics trite. I'm surprised that they passed the quality control screening. But I also think the same about I'm With Stupid. Anything that could be a cheap t-shirt logo is a mistake.

richwill
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Instrumental delights

#12 Post by richwill »

What about an album of acapella versions?

User avatar
ZiggyPSB
Posts: 2353
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2007, 11:05 am

Re: Instrumental delights

#13 Post by ZiggyPSB »

df118junkie wrote:I agree. I find the lyrics trite. I'm surprised that they passed the quality control screening. But I also think the same about I'm With Stupid. Anything that could be a cheap t-shirt logo is a mistake.
That goes for a third of Super. Made into a T-shirt.

Image
I'm a proud sycophant because I like Wedding in Berlin
Image
http://www.last.fm/user/FFancy24
Dublin 19/06/2011, Manchester 20/06/2013, Edinburgh 31/12/2013, London 23/07/2014, London 23/07/2016, London 02/04/2017

Post Reply