Page 2 of 2
Re: Why don't they do a retrospective remix album?
Posted: Thu 16 Sep 2010, 9:29 am
by Marcus
Bruno Republic wrote:Marcus wrote:I wouldn't like one, unless it has at least all Promo/Vinyl onlys mixes and unreleased ones.
"At least all"? That would be a rather expensive box set... besides, some of that stuff didn't get a commercial release for good reason. Have you ever heard the Tomcraft remixes of "In Private"?
Yes, I have the 12". The mixes are sick.
But I don't see any other point releasing a remix compilation. Certainly not for a collector.
Re: Why don't they do a retrospective remix album?
Posted: Mon 20 Sep 2010, 6:05 pm
by Oznerol
just wait for 'Disco 5' and maybe it´ll came true

Re: Why don't they do a retrospective remix album?
Posted: Tue 21 Sep 2010, 7:34 am
by seriously
Hit Music 2011, I Want a Lover 2011, How I Learned to Hate Rock and Roll 2011, In the Night 2011... or just do "live versions" of these never-performed-live fan favourites. (was In the Night played on the first tour?)
Re: Why don't they do a retrospective remix album?
Posted: Fri 24 Sep 2010, 1:45 pm
by tottenhammattspurs
Was That What It Was? (Boyz Noize Thumpadub Edit)

Re: Why don't they do a retrospective remix album?
Posted: Fri 24 Sep 2010, 6:28 pm
by Harry
I guess 'Pandemonium' is the closest thing to what you describe, in that all the tracks are 2009 Stuart Price remixes with new vocals

Re: Why don't they do a retrospective remix album?
Posted: Sat 25 Sep 2010, 7:01 am
by retrofuturist
A release akin to Sparks' Plagiarism wouldn't be bad.
Retro.
