Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
-
rathound
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
I don't think any of the 3 albums - Bilingual, Nightlife or Release were terrible, but for whatever reason didn't hit the heights. Bilingual the best of the 3 by a distance but still a couple of duffers in there and they should have gone full out with the latin sound, it does sound a bit half arsed at times. Nightlife half great, half dross. Release is pleasant enough but not really what I want from PSB, can understand why they did it. Flamboyant, Miracles and Disco 3 all showed they still had the magic when they wanted
I don't think any of the 3 albums - Bilingual, Nightlife or Release were terrible, but for whatever reason didn't hit the heights. Bilingual the best of the 3 by a distance but still a couple of duffers in there and they should have gone full out with the latin sound, it does sound a bit half arsed at times. Nightlife half great, half dross. Release is pleasant enough but not really what I want from PSB, can understand why they did it. Flamboyant, Miracles and Disco 3 all showed they still had the magic when they wanted
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Greetings,
Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05
I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.
Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.
Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.
However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.
Retro.
On that note...rathound wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 9:23 am All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05
I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.
Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.
Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.
However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.
Retro.
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)
- Lleonard Pler
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
All those Elton collabs were atrocious. This doesn't belong in FL not even for completism.
Last edited by Lleonard Pler on Thu 28 May 2026, 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
It's all true. Working with Elton never really worked out well. This is one of those tracks on the FL-discs that's not "master quality".retrofuturist wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:20 am Greetings,
On that note...rathound wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 9:23 am All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05
I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.
Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.
Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.
However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.
Retro.![]()
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
No way near Dylan going electric. One example: where are the drums on Release? Did they forget or didn't they know what a real drummer does to a track. "Drum programming" (and some percussion), come on, having a real drummer that would've been daring and a proper "outside of comfort zone".NotInvisible wrote: Wed 27 May 2026, 1:22 amMaybe I'm misunderstanding you, but are we pretending Release wasn't them being daring? It's basically the PSB equivalent of Dylan going electric!telys wrote: Tue 26 May 2026, 12:29 pmI guess lost opportunites have something to do about daring. They didn't dare to do that stripped down album "Release" that would made people, certainly the critics, go "wow".
Marr plays guitar but isn't allowed that much. Maybe I would've prefered Neil's guitar on Release, perhaps it would've been more vulnerable.
So no Release is not a stripped down album, it's them pretending it is.
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
-
rathound
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
yes another skip. In Private was certainly pretty poor, shame as I like the Dusty versiontelys wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:23 amIt's all true. Working with Elton never really worked out well. This is one of those tracks on the FL-discs that's not "master quality".retrofuturist wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:20 am Greetings,
On that note...rathound wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 9:23 am All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05
I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.
Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.
Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.
However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.
Retro.![]()
-
Capsigrany
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
That medley was not that bad at all, it only lacks a bit of studio work as it was intended to be a TV number only. But I agree, the PSB/Elton collaborations have never worked, I don’t think Elton’s voice suits electronic music. Talking about Elton… does anyone know what really happened between them? Are they still pissed-off?
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Not a collaboration but many of us believe b-side Through you is about Elton. x
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
I thought Believe was a surprisingly good song that fits PSB very well.
The mashup with Song For Guy was done seamlessly.
The mashup with Song For Guy was done seamlessly.
-
NotInvisible
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
You're right - it's an album that sounds like definitive Pet Shop Boys, exactly what everyone was expecting from them, and the fans adored it because it was so on-model for them. Where's a facepalm emoji when you need one?telys wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:27 amNo way near Dylan going electric. One example: where are the drums on Release? Did they forget or didn't they know what a real drummer does to a track. "Drum programming" (and some percussion), come on, having a real drummer that would've been daring and a proper "outside of comfort zone".
LMFAOSo no Release is not a stripped down album, it's them pretending it is.
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Greetings,
Pushing through...
Track 126 : Sail Away
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:06
Originally from the 1998 compilation "Twentieth Century Blues - The Songs Of Noël Coward" that Neil was executive producer on, and later as a b-side to 2000's You Only Tell Me You Love Me When You're Drunk, this is the Pet Shop Boys' second Noël Coward cover, following on from 1994's If Love Were All.
It's a sweet enough tune, very inoffensive. It definitely doesn't bang like The Divine Comedy's Underworld-esque "I've Been To A Marvellous Party" from the aforementioned tribute album.
Retro.
Pushing through...
Track 126 : Sail Away
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:06
Originally from the 1998 compilation "Twentieth Century Blues - The Songs Of Noël Coward" that Neil was executive producer on, and later as a b-side to 2000's You Only Tell Me You Love Me When You're Drunk, this is the Pet Shop Boys' second Noël Coward cover, following on from 1994's If Love Were All.
It's a sweet enough tune, very inoffensive. It definitely doesn't bang like The Divine Comedy's Underworld-esque "I've Been To A Marvellous Party" from the aforementioned tribute album.
Retro.
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)
-
Capsigrany
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Nice homage. It sounds effortless and I think that it has aged surprisingly well.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Just going back for one second to Elton John - this was about the time Elton started sounding like a parody of himself - like Vic Reeves' club singer in Shooting Stars. I had a really hard time listening to the PSB collabs with Elton as a result. Not my cup of tea - musically though all top notch imho. Just his vocals sounded a bit like pub karaoke.
Sail Away is a pretty song - nothing to write home about, but I wonder if Neil felt duty bound because he was producing the Noel Coward album, to do something befitting the man and let Neil Hannon loose instead (I've Been to a Marvellous Party is awesome btw)
Sail Away is a pretty song - nothing to write home about, but I wonder if Neil felt duty bound because he was producing the Noel Coward album, to do something befitting the man and let Neil Hannon loose instead (I've Been to a Marvellous Party is awesome btw)
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 4084
- Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Greetings,
Time now for...
Track 127 : It Doesn't Often Snow At Christmas
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:07 (Fan Club Mix)
Chronology: Yes, FL-CD2:02 (New Version)
Per Drico's rules in the OP, "any track appearing more than once will have all of its versions discussed on first appearance"... so feel free to discuss the original version, or the later version from the Christmas EP.
Retro.
Time now for...
Track 127 : It Doesn't Often Snow At Christmas
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:07 (Fan Club Mix)
Chronology: Yes, FL-CD2:02 (New Version)
Per Drico's rules in the OP, "any track appearing more than once will have all of its versions discussed on first appearance"... so feel free to discuss the original version, or the later version from the Christmas EP.
Retro.
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Fantastic track, great hook. Always a christmas favourite here.