Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
rathound
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1966 Post by rathound »

All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable

I don't think any of the 3 albums - Bilingual, Nightlife or Release were terrible, but for whatever reason didn't hit the heights. Bilingual the best of the 3 by a distance but still a couple of duffers in there and they should have gone full out with the latin sound, it does sound a bit half arsed at times. Nightlife half great, half dross. Release is pleasant enough but not really what I want from PSB, can understand why they did it. Flamboyant, Miracles and Disco 3 all showed they still had the magic when they wanted

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4084
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1967 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
rathound wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 9:23 am All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
On that note...

Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05


I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.

Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.

Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.

However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1513
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1968 Post by Lleonard Pler »

All those Elton collabs were atrocious. This doesn't belong in FL not even for completism.
Last edited by Lleonard Pler on Thu 28 May 2026, 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1969 Post by telys »

retrofuturist wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:20 am Greetings,
rathound wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 9:23 am All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
On that note...

Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05


I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.

Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.

Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.

However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.

Retro. :)
It's all true. Working with Elton never really worked out well. This is one of those tracks on the FL-discs that's not "master quality".
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1970 Post by telys »

NotInvisible wrote: Wed 27 May 2026, 1:22 am
telys wrote: Tue 26 May 2026, 12:29 pmI guess lost opportunites have something to do about daring. They didn't dare to do that stripped down album "Release" that would made people, certainly the critics, go "wow".
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but are we pretending Release wasn't them being daring? It's basically the PSB equivalent of Dylan going electric!
No way near Dylan going electric. One example: where are the drums on Release? Did they forget or didn't they know what a real drummer does to a track. "Drum programming" (and some percussion), come on, having a real drummer that would've been daring and a proper "outside of comfort zone".
Marr plays guitar but isn't allowed that much. Maybe I would've prefered Neil's guitar on Release, perhaps it would've been more vulnerable.
So no Release is not a stripped down album, it's them pretending it is.
----
You've got me all wrong

rathound
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1971 Post by rathound »

telys wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:23 am
retrofuturist wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:20 am Greetings,
rathound wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 9:23 am All a bit substandard these bonus track at this point. Haven't listened to them for years, none very memorable
On that note...

Track 125 : Believe / Song For Guy (feat. Elton John)
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:05


I had to go back and listen to this, to even remember what it sounded like. It turns out I barely remembered it.

Now that it's finished, I can still hardly remember it.

Chronologically, this was the first of three ill-fated and utterly pointless collaborations with Elton John.

However, merely being "utterly pointless" puts it leagues above the later sacrilege that this threesome would end up partaking upon In Private.

Retro. :)
It's all true. Working with Elton never really worked out well. This is one of those tracks on the FL-discs that's not "master quality".
yes another skip. In Private was certainly pretty poor, shame as I like the Dusty version

Capsigrany
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1972 Post by Capsigrany »

That medley was not that bad at all, it only lacks a bit of studio work as it was intended to be a TV number only. But I agree, the PSB/Elton collaborations have never worked, I don’t think Elton’s voice suits electronic music. Talking about Elton… does anyone know what really happened between them? Are they still pissed-off?

User avatar
MikeyC
Posts: 1939
Joined: Sat 07 Oct 2006, 5:28 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1973 Post by MikeyC »

Not a collaboration but many of us believe b-side Through you is about Elton. x

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3573
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1974 Post by leesmapman »

I thought Believe was a surprisingly good song that fits PSB very well.

The mashup with Song For Guy was done seamlessly.

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1975 Post by NotInvisible »

telys wrote: Thu 28 May 2026, 11:27 amNo way near Dylan going electric. One example: where are the drums on Release? Did they forget or didn't they know what a real drummer does to a track. "Drum programming" (and some percussion), come on, having a real drummer that would've been daring and a proper "outside of comfort zone".
You're right - it's an album that sounds like definitive Pet Shop Boys, exactly what everyone was expecting from them, and the fans adored it because it was so on-model for them. Where's a facepalm emoji when you need one?
So no Release is not a stripped down album, it's them pretending it is.
LMFAO

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4084
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1976 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

Pushing through...

Track 126 : Sail Away
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:06


Originally from the 1998 compilation "Twentieth Century Blues - The Songs Of Noël Coward" that Neil was executive producer on, and later as a b-side to 2000's You Only Tell Me You Love Me When You're Drunk, this is the Pet Shop Boys' second Noël Coward cover, following on from 1994's If Love Were All.

It's a sweet enough tune, very inoffensive. It definitely doesn't bang like The Divine Comedy's Underworld-esque "I've Been To A Marvellous Party" from the aforementioned tribute album.

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

Capsigrany
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1977 Post by Capsigrany »

Nice homage. It sounds effortless and I think that it has aged surprisingly well.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1978 Post by Gabby »

Just going back for one second to Elton John - this was about the time Elton started sounding like a parody of himself - like Vic Reeves' club singer in Shooting Stars. I had a really hard time listening to the PSB collabs with Elton as a result. Not my cup of tea - musically though all top notch imho. Just his vocals sounded a bit like pub karaoke.

Sail Away is a pretty song - nothing to write home about, but I wonder if Neil felt duty bound because he was producing the Noel Coward album, to do something befitting the man and let Neil Hannon loose instead (I've Been to a Marvellous Party is awesome btw)

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4084
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1979 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

Time now for...

Track 127 : It Doesn't Often Snow At Christmas
Chronology: Nightlife, FL-CD1:07 (Fan Club Mix)
Chronology: Yes, FL-CD2:02 (New Version)


Per Drico's rules in the OP, "any track appearing more than once will have all of its versions discussed on first appearance"... so feel free to discuss the original version, or the later version from the Christmas EP.

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3573
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1980 Post by leesmapman »

Fantastic track, great hook. Always a christmas favourite here.

Post Reply