Pani wrote:
Why not? I'd like to see that! C'mon,
you want anyone to do it! Otherwise
you wouldn't mention ...
I had a jolly good laugh by the imagi-
nation!
Oh, ok then. Can you do one? You are a dab hand with photography.
The complexity of the font, getting the right colour of black because theres so many shades of it out there, making the PSB's hardly visible to symbolise people being left in the dark about when the album was actually being released.........seriously though, wtf
Undertaker wrote:Maybe a few street lights down a seedy alleyway and Fudamental on an actual sign, could have worked. With PSB dressed like that, it has the ''back street in London feel to it.
And please, with some of the great artwork ive seen on here, no one do a cover of the camel.
Dave
r u sure that you are not one of little britain characters???
"It´s fundamental that we do only exist in our own universe. When you like Pet Shop Boys, you are in our world. This is absolutely crucial to our entire outlook...what we do has an incredibly strong identity and applies only to us. It´s a case of not recognising the existence of anybody else!". Neil Tennant.
Nearly fell down from my chair so funny it is. Thanks!
First I thought it was April 1 joke but now it seems to be real cover. I quite like it, I can even say love it, but:
a) I'd like it to be lighter;
b) It's strange that photos from the same photosession are used for both 1st single covers and album cover, I'd prefer them to be different.
But still it'll be one of my faves along with Behaviour and Nightlife.
I like the cover...at first i was like..hmm its a bit boring. but after looking at it for a while its clearly reminiscent of early psb...which = a good thing (even if they both look like bored palbearers )
I don't think its that unbalanced. On the print version you'll probably get to see a little bit of the rest of their bodies showing making it more balanced
...the original is seriously unbalanced.... 
