Pet Shop Boys Community

hopefully it will be Milliband rather than union thug Ed Balls, a man who makes Prescott seem like Oscar Wilde

Patrick Bateman wrote:http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/43 ... efits.html

ffs

Lucy wrote:ffs

And that's 'New' Labour in a nutshell for you: incompetent f*cktards who have destroyed this country over the last thirteen years. Quite how Afghan refugees end up here is a mystery seeing as we don't border their country, and there are a plethora of European countries between us and them but I suppose they had a magic carpet.

And of course one wasn't allowed to discuss cases like this without being called a bigot.

(and we all know who people getting £166,000 per annum from the British taxpayer are going to vote for in an election )

^Lets hope Cameron and Clegg sort this out then. It bloody annoyed me reading what theyve got in that house, when we're scraping by with sod all! How did labour justify giving them all that money? Why??

You cant even mention immigration without being seen as racist.

Lucy wrote:How did labour justify giving them all that money? Why??

Because they were incompetent imbeciles who were so hellbent on changing the demographics of the country that it was worth it to them, and because there are still some mental lefties around who have taken advantage of the PC climate to screw the indigenous population over.

Labours policies directly matched those of the short term false economic prosperity idea they foisted on the general population: 'borrow,borrow, borrow, don't think about tomorrow"

They did that cos the Tories sold everything off in the 80s and fostered the idea of lowering your costs being the bottom line in business, thus creating the consnsus that it was okay for British companies to shift production overseas. Uk was therefore left with a need to create consumers rather than workers - hey presto financial services 'industry' under New Labour. asset stripping/outscourcing will continue under the CON-DEM pact and we will be in a greater mess than we are today given that bopth parties are free market/ low regulation advocates.

Most of the immigrants we have inrecent years actually came in under the Tories given our shit foreign policy and failure to act in conflicts where we had no economic interest - somalia, the balkans, south america. CApitalism benefits from all of this immigration anyhow as it enables them to lower costs - i.e wages.....

Patrick Bateman wrote:mental lefties around who have taken advantage of the PC climate to screw the indigenous population over.

There is no "indigenous population" of the British Isles. Human beings come from Africa. The only difference is the date on which they or their antecedents immigrated here.

Danny C wrote:

Patrick Bateman wrote:mental lefties around who have taken advantage of the PC climate to screw the indigenous population over.

There is no "indigenous population" of the British Isles. Human beings come from Africa. The only difference is the date on which they or their antecedents immigrated here.

Sorry to change the topic slightly, but that might not actually be true if a recent scientific paper is to be believed. I'll see if I can find it online somewhere.

Also, did anyone else read about the recent findings that pretty much prove that Neanderthal man interbred with Homo Sapiens, and all Europeans, Middle Easterns and Asians have their DNA. People from Central and Southern Africa do not.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/s ... 118573.ece

Lucy wrote:You cant even mention immigration without being seen as racist.

That's possibly because most "mentions" of immigration are racially motivated - or at the very least propagandise a racist agenda by proxy. Let's face it, when people are posting articles from The Daily Mail to make a "point" about immigration, then it's transparently clear that a rational and balanced discussion is impossible. Even if the point is one of waste rather than downright anti-Johnny Foreignerism, immigrants as a group are far too handy a target for anybody to be too comfortable playing into the hands of the Daily Mail's xenophobic agenda. This after all is the newspaper whose owner supported Hitler, Mussolini, and Oswald Mosley in the 1930s. They don't care too much for the waste of public money when the royal family are the source.

Let's be clear. The only people losing sleep at night about immigration *are* bigots. Brown's biggest blunder was not calling that bint from Rochdale a bigot, but in apologising to the ignorant old harridan.

Drico.

Drico One wrote:That's possibly because most "mentions" of immigration are racially motivated - or at the very least propagandise a racist agenda by proxy. Let's face it, when people are posting articles from The Daily Mail to make a "point" about immigration, then it's transparently clear that a rational and balanced discussion is impossible. Even if the point is one of waste rather than downright anti-Johnny Foreignerism, immigrants as a group are far too handy a target for anybody to be too comfortable playing into the hands of the Daily Mail's xenophobic agenda. This after all is the newspaper whose owner supported Hitler, Mussolini, and Oswald Mosley in the 1930s. They don't care too much for the waste of public money when the royal family are the source.

Let's be clear. The only people losing sleep at night about immigration *are* bigots. Brown's biggest blunder was not calling that bint from Rochdale a bigot, but in apologising to the ignorant old harridan.

That's specious reasoning. I'm no fan of the Daily Mail but these kind of stories are true, whether or not they get off on reporting them. When I find amazing is how all these immigrants manage to arrive on this sceptred isle despite having a vast continental land mass between them and us. If I was genuinely in fear for my life, I'd flee to the nearest country so really the only refugees we should have here are the odd Scot who's fallen out of favour with Mad Jock MacTavish and Welshmen who are frightened of sheep.

^Exactly, they come here because theyll be better off, not out of fear. As that article shows, they end up better off than the people already here..it is a joke! whether the newspaper is biased or not doesnt change the fact of how much money this family was given.

the problem is the Mail et al will highlight immigrant families, I'm sure there are a large number of 'pure bred' British families being as parasitic. There was a story couple of years ago about a child killed by an immigrant drunk driver, the argument being that if he wasn't in the country child would still be alive, well yes very possibly, but compared to people killed by 'genuine' Brit drink drivers a drop in the ocean. Drink driving is the killer not nationality

Oh there are plenty of indigenous benefit scroungers too but who can blame them really when people are prepared to come half-way round the world for our hand-outs?

well they are both as bad as one another -a lazy shit is a lazy shit. At least they made the effort to travel unlike a Brit scrounger