Page 73 of 160
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 11:25 pm
by markus
NotInvisible wrote: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 11:18 pm
markus wrote: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 10:21 pmAt the same time, the cynic in me can’t help thinking: career suicide in the making.
It was a b-side on the sixth single of the Very era. I think everyone knew what they were in for...
More from the straight-jacketed Neil?
On the flip side wearing a gay jacket was expected?
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:08 am
by NotInvisible
markus wrote: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 11:25 pmMore from the straight-jacketed Neil?
On the flip side wearing a gay jacket was expected?
A low-key b-side from the group that already had Later Tonight, It Couldn't Happen Here, Do I Have To? and Your Funny Uncle in the catalogue. Anyone committed enough to be buying the sixth single from an album campaign would already have been familiar with this aspect of their work. It wouldn't have been surprising, let alone career suicide. Hence another three Top 10 hits in the next album campaign...
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:45 am
by markus
NotInvisible wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:08 am
markus wrote: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 11:25 pmMore from the straight-jacketed Neil?
On the flip side wearing a gay jacket was expected?
A low-key b-side from the group that already had Later Tonight, It Couldn't Happen Here, Do I Have To? and Your Funny Uncle in the catalogue. Anyone committed enough to be buying the sixth single from an album campaign would already have been familiar with this aspect of their work. It wouldn't have been surprising, let alone career suicide. Hence another three Top 10 hits in the next album campaign...
Are you sure that argument would hold up in court? You said it yourself: “overtly gay.”
In this case, more was still to come—right up to the point where even some fans began to protest. Go West was already overkill for some.
I had a field day, don't get me wrong.

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:57 am
by NotInvisible
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:45 amAre you sure that argument would hold up in court? You said it yourself: “overtly gay.”
Sorry, I thought we were talking about the music.
Yes, it's their first track with an overtly gay lyric. Absolutely nobody was surprised, and the subsequent releases prove it wasn't career suicide as you claim:
6 Disco 2
15 Paninaro '95
2 Alternative
8 Before
8 Se a Vida E
4 Bilingual
14 Single
9 A Red Letter Day
9 Somewhere
They remained a chart force for quite some time.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:06 am
by petshopgrrl
NotInvisible wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:57 am
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:45 amAre you sure that argument would hold up in court? You said it yourself: “overtly gay.”
Sorry, I thought we were talking about the music.
Yeah, so did the rest of us. Can we get back to talking about the music? Please?? Maybe someone can start another thread if they want to continue discussing the career-suicide narrative.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:17 am
by markus
petshopgrrl wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:06 am
NotInvisible wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:57 am
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:45 amAre you sure that argument would hold up in court? You said it yourself: “overtly gay.”
Sorry, I thought we were talking about the music.
Yeah, so did the rest of us. Can we get back to talking about the music? Please?? Maybe someone can start another thread if they want to continue discussing the career-suicide narrative.
I don't think we can completely separate the career aspect from the music really. Especially when discussing a time when they still had some chart success. Absolutely Fabulous is up next.

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:23 am
by NotInvisible
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:17 amI don't think we can completely separate the career aspect from the music really.
Of course you can. The songs exist as... songs.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:28 am
by markus
NotInvisible wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:23 am
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:17 amI don't think we can completely separate the career aspect from the music really.
Of course you can. The songs exist as... songs.
The forum is already quiet as it is.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 2:20 am
by NotInvisible
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:28 amThe forum is already quiet as it is.
So talk about the songs, you silly sausage.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 2:41 am
by markus
NotInvisible wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 2:20 am
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 1:28 amThe forum is already quiet as it is.
So talk about the songs, you silly sausage.
But I believe that since my life began
the most I've had is just
a sausage to amuse
Heigh-ho, if love were all.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 6:06 pm
by Drico One
I was losing interest by If love were all or, more to the point, the last days of the elongated Very campaign. 1994 was a real anti-climax after the fizzy euphoria of Can you forgive her?, Go West, and Very Relentless. A number two single, a number one album, a Pet Shop Boys Day on Radio 1... Halcyon days. I didn't like the singles of 1994 at all. Liberation - another nice song - wasn't where I was at at 21. Yesterday, when I was mad was an in-joke that was always going to outstay its welcome nine months after the album was released. And Absolutely fabulous was just a joke. It's not like any of these singles were terrible - catch me at the right moment and they are enjoyable, and some had epic b-sides. But after what had gone before, I personally found the drop-off precipitous. Then there was Disco 2...
I think, for me, they crossed the fine line dividing kitsch and weird in 1994. If love were all is, obviously, a good song, melodious, and poignant, but it passed me by. Then again, I was never much of a fan of the Richard Niles side of their oeuvre.
Drico.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 6:27 pm
by Disco.
5th single.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 6:30 pm
by Disco.
NotInvisible wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:57 am
markus wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 12:45 amAre you sure that argument would hold up in court? You said it yourself: “overtly gay.”
Sorry, I thought we were talking about the music.
Yes, it's their first track with an overtly gay lyric. Absolutely nobody was surprised, and the subsequent releases prove it wasn't career suicide as you claim:
6 Disco 2
15 Paninaro '95
2 Alternative
8 Before
8 Se a Vida E
4 Bilingual
14 Single
9 A Red Letter Day
9 Somewhere
They remained a chart force for quite some time.
Before 7
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 7:01 pm
by Patrick Bateman
Drico One wrote: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 6:06 pm
I was losing interest by If love were all or, more to the point, the last days of the elongated Very campaign. 1994 was a real anti-climax after the fizzy euphoria of Can you forgive her?, Go West, and Very Relentless. A number two single, a number one album, a Pet Shop Boys Day on Radio 1... Halcyon days. I didn't like the singles of 1994 at all. Liberation - another nice song - wasn't where I was at at 21. Yesterday, when I was mad was an in-joke that was always going to outstay its welcome nine months after the album was released. And Absolutely fabulous was just a joke. It's not like any of these singles were terrible - catch me at the right moment and they are enjoyable, and some had epic b-sides. But after what had gone before, I personally found the drop-off precipitous. Then there was Disco 2...
I think, for me, they crossed the fine line dividing kitsch and weird in 1994. If love were all is, obviously, a good song, melodious, and poignant, but it passed me by. Then again, I was never much of a fan of the Richard Niles side of their oeuvre.
Drico.
I mean we're going to get onto crossing that line with the next track but your point about your 21-year-old self being rather underwhelmed by them is key. If their own fanbase who'd grown up with them weren't that bothered, the new pop kids certainly weren't going to get into them. It was a really exciting time for music - loads of dance music, exciting europop and indie was still really good and hadn't yet been Oasis-ed.
When the TOTP repeats were on, I remember that No Good by The Prodigy was out at the same time as Ab Fab. No contest, Neil darling.
https://www.officialcharts.com/charts/s ... 0605/7501/
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Mon 19 Jan 2026, 7:49 pm
by New Devon Boy
petshopgrrl wrote: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 9:19 pm
telys wrote: Sun 18 Jan 2026, 5:40 pm
Time for the next track, please. I don't dare to start,,,, and have forgotten which track is the next one.
Here, allow me...
Track 82:
If Love Were All
Chronology:
Very, Further Listening, Track 11
This cover of a Noel Coward song was an extra track on the "Yesterday when I was mad" single and features a delightfully plaintive and wistful vocal from Neil. (Would I be right in guessing the vocal is single-tracked for once, for that extra added vulnerability?) Big band orchestration is by Richard Niles. Love that piano and trumpet work.
My least favourite track. At least the Coconut 1 remix on Yesterday made up for it!