Page 10 of 11
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 11:13 pm
by Sandy Shaw
rashomon wrote: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 10:39 pm
signs books and leaves
Excellent!
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Thu 08 Nov 2018, 8:52 am
by Sandy Shaw
daveid wrote: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 10:08 pm
It was nice of Matt Johnson to step in!
Good one!
Isn't he the the lead singer of (the) The The?
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Thu 08 Nov 2018, 6:41 pm
by daveid
Sandy Shaw wrote: Thu 08 Nov 2018, 8:52 am
daveid wrote: Wed 07 Nov 2018, 10:08 pm
It was nice of Matt Johnson to step in!
Good one!
Isn't he the the lead singer of (the) The The?
Yep
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Fri 07 May 2021, 5:10 pm
by Sandy Shaw
Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:19 pm
by telys
100 lyrics and a poem is a disaster regarding its structure.
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
by Dog
Sandy Shaw wrote:Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Sat 08 May 2021, 1:59 pm
by Sandy Shaw
Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Sat 08 May 2021, 9:56 pm
by Dog
Sandy Shaw wrote:Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:Sadly the fan who asked about dreams in the Letters Section of Annually 2021(Literally 47) has had their name missed out and the space has been left out after the previous question.
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
Of course. We have met a couple of times

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Sun 09 May 2021, 2:45 pm
by telys
Dog wrote: Sat 08 May 2021, 9:56 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
Of course. We have met a couple of times
Cool, thus not all of us are inside the realm of obscure anonymity.
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Sun 16 May 2021, 1:28 pm
by Sandy Shaw
Dog wrote: Sat 08 May 2021, 9:56 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote:Dog wrote: Fri 07 May 2021, 8:36 pm
As the asker of the previous question, I noticed this too.
A very good question Dog. or can I call you Chris!?
Of course. We have met a couple of times

I remember.
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 2:32 pm
by Sandy Shaw
20260416_143032.jpg
There may be other errors, but there's a glaring one on page 58 of Volume after the words "innocent image" where I imagine a comma was intended.
I'm grateful to the Boys for each and every venture and product by the way, this thread is in that context. There's so much to enjoy that is spot on and brilliant!
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 11:02 pm
by Sandy Shaw
Can you spot the blooper on this page from the latest Annually?
20260416_225959.jpg
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Fri 17 Apr 2026, 12:45 am
by daveid
I haven't got that far yet with Literally, but I will say that Volume has a number of errors, more factual than spelling.
Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Fri 17 Apr 2026, 1:22 am
by petshopgrrl
Sandy Shaw wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 11:02 pm
Can you spot the blooper on this page from the latest Annually?
20260416_225959.jpg
Dammit Sandy, I just spent five minutes looking for stray apostrophes! But yes, that is quite a pretty and witty blooper.

Re: The Boys need a better proofreader!
Posted: Fri 17 Apr 2026, 7:14 am
by Patrick Bateman
daveid wrote: Fri 17 Apr 2026, 12:45 am
I haven't got that far yet with Literally, but I will say that Volume has a number of errors, more factual than spelling.
Really? That is disappointing, if unsurprising.