Pet Shop Boys Community

joncool5 wrote:what the hell is IT going on about now. Bloody Hell!!!!!!!

Was going to reply the exact same thing!

popfreak wrote:How can you make such a ludicrous point when you haven't heard the tracks.
How can it be a classic PSB order when you have no idea what they sound like.

Exactly!

Maybe PopJustice is lying about the CD, but maybe it's a double bluff by The Boys and there is no new album called Fundamental.

Maybe the new album is actually a Superchumbo collaboration based on Disco 2 and mixed by Nickname?

I, very politely, along with a number of other people, asked you to consider your topics before you posted them last week. The message clearly didn't get through.

Now, please stop, before we all spontaneously combust as a result of your sheer mind numbing banality.

Thankyou

popfreak wrote:How can you make such a ludicrous point when you haven't heard the tracks.
How can it be a classic PSB order when you have no idea what they sound like.

I've said: supposing Popjustice has told the true.

nickname wrote:

popfreak wrote:How can you make such a ludicrous point when you haven't heard the tracks.
How can it be a classic PSB order when you have no idea what they sound like.

I've said: supposing Popjustice has told the true.

maybe the true have not popjustice been told and know we never will until poll maybe conducted soon

Hold on just a cotton picking minute!! The fella has a serious point here!!

If 'Numb' is indeed track number 8, in the same way that 'It's A Sin' was track number 7, surely this means it's going to be a good, nay, great song?

Anything else would just be off the scale of sanity, meaningless, time wasting speculation!!

Nickname, I'm going to hazard a guess that you don't work in the city. You'd never make any money with that kind of reserved, conservative speculation. Sometimes you have to use your imagination.

ArseSpanker wrote:If 'Numb' is indeed track number 8, in the same way that 'It's A Sin' was track number 7, surely this means it's going to be a good, nay, great song?

And the stinker is apparently Twentieth Century which is the eleventh track, a prime number and also palindromic. What does it all mean?

I'm with ArseSpanker on this - nickname has an extremely salient point. I'm quite shocked at the negativity towards him. In other more cerebral environments the man would be respected, even worshipped.

Janet Street-Porter wrote:

ArseSpanker wrote:If 'Numb' is indeed track number 8, in the same way that 'It's A Sin' was track number 7, surely this means it's going to be a good, nay, great song?

And the stinker is apparently Twentieth Century which is the eleventh track, a prime number and also palindromic. What does it all mean?

I'm with ArseSpanker on this - nickname has an extremely salient point. I'm quite shocked at the negativity towards him. In other more cerebral environments the man would be respected, even worshipped.

Everybody, bow down at the altar of Nickname

gareth wrote:

Janet Street-Porter wrote:

ArseSpanker wrote:If 'Numb' is indeed track number 8, in the same way that 'It's A Sin' was track number 7, surely this means it's going to be a good, nay, great song?

And the stinker is apparently Twentieth Century which is the eleventh track, a prime number and also palindromic. What does it all mean?

I'm with ArseSpanker on this - nickname has an extremely salient point. I'm quite shocked at the negativity towards him. In other more cerebral environments the man would be respected, even worshipped.

Everybody, bow down at the altar of Nickname

Don't talk about everybody. Come on!, reading your thread it's clear you want to kiss my shoes. Jannet can help you.



It's funny to see some same people replying my threads (overall Janet, Gareth, Ghost) again and again, obssesion?.

Why can't everyone just respect what everyone else has to say? He did nothing wrong. If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them. The poor guy (or girl) got attacked by all these people at once. I'd be pretty upset if I were him

westendboy87 wrote:Why can't everyone just respect what everyone else has to say? He did nothing wrong. If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them. The poor guy (or girl) got attacked by all these people at once. I'd be pretty upset if I were him

Hi Brian

I love this forum because it reflects the great interest in PSB and the vast range of opinions and contradictions they trigger. And the bottom line is that we are all here for the same reason - we love'em.

The fact is however that the forum has been full of the most ridiculous polls and threads over the past few weeks and months. I can only speak for myself (although I think I have a lot of support) but I for one don't care how many pages the album booklet will have. I'm not going to speculate that a certain track will be rubbish just because it's the 6th track on the album. I'm truly not fussed what colour socks Chris was wearing when the strings were recorded on the album.

This is pretty much where it's been recently, and not just from our old friend Nickname, there are others too.

Why should the rest of us have to trawl through such banal, childish and quite frankly stupid topics just to make a valid point or enagage in adult discussion is beyond me. Everyone is totally free to post whatever they want on here (within reason), but it's getting on people's nerves now and you therefore see the kind of reaction above. No one is attacking Nickname, that's too harsh a way of putting it. They are just reacting to yet another thread that serves no purpose at all.

Rant over, now where's that poll on how silvery the CD will be..........................

gareth wrote:

westendboy87 wrote:Why can't everyone just respect what everyone else has to say? He did nothing wrong. If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them. The poor guy (or girl) got attacked by all these people at once. I'd be pretty upset if I were him

Hi Brian

I love this forum because it reflects the great interest in PSB and the vast range of opinions and contradictions they trigger. And the bottom line is that we are all here for the same reason - we love'em.

The fact is however that the forum has been full of the most ridiculous polls and threads over the past few weeks and months. I can only speak for myself (although I think I have a lot of support) but I for one don't care how many pages the album booklet will have. I'm not going to speculate that a certain track will be rubbish just because it's the 6th track on the album. I'm truly not fussed what colour socks Chris was wearing when the strings were recorded on the album.

This is pretty much where it's been recently, and not just from our old friend Nickname, there are others too.

Why should the rest of us have to trawl through such banal, childish and quite frankly stupid topics just to make a valid point or enagage in adult discussion is beyond me. Everyone is totally free to post whatever they want on here (within reason), but it's getting on people's nerves now and you therefore see the kind of reaction above. No one is attacking Nickname, that's too harsh a way of putting it. They are just reacting to yet another thread that serves no purpose at all.

Rant over, now where's that poll on how silvery the CD will be..........................

Maybe my posts are ridiculous, but the MOST RIDICULOUS THING I can do is giving up to express my opinion because some people don't like it.

Apart from that, I think PSB (and maybe EMI) like to put the songs in a correct order (according the quality of the songs and other things) and I don't believe it's a bad thing to think why they choose this order.

westendboy87 wrote:Why can't everyone just respect what everyone else has to say? He did nothing wrong. If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them. The poor guy (or girl) got attacked by all these people at once. I'd be pretty upset if I were him

I didn't think I was going to like this post, therefore I didn't read it.

So, I guess Nickname is still a bit daft.

Seriously though, I don't have a problem with anyone on this forum. That doesn't mean that I don't get a heck of a lot of enjoyment out of poking fun. It helps keep me sane and has the added benefit of allowing me to take my frustration out on others with there being absolutely no chance of the victim coming knocking on my door.

I mean it folks. I've knocked your pint over and I'm eyeing up your missus or your fella as we speak.

What're you going to do about it?

nickname wrote:Maybe my posts are ridiculous, but the MOST RIDICULOUS THING I can do is giving up to express my opinion because some people don't like it.

Apart from that, I think PSB (and maybe EMI) like to put the songs in a correct order (according the quality of the songs and other things) and I don't believe it's a bad thing to think why they choose this order.

BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!

ArseSpanker wrote:Hold on just a cotton picking minute!! The fella has a serious point here!!

If 'Numb' is indeed track number 8, in the same way that 'It's A Sin' was track number 7, surely this means it's going to be a good, nay, great song?

Anything else would just be off the scale of sanity, meaningless, time wasting speculation!!

Nickname, I'm going to hazard a guess that you don't work in the city. You'd never make any money with that kind of reserved, conservative speculation. Sometimes you have to use your imagination.