Page 2 of 3

Re: Minimal (Tiga remix)

Posted: Mon 22 May 2006, 12:12 am
by geowayne
! wrote:At first I thought people just had a promo or something with it on but it seems more and more people are hearing it, and on the guy (Wayne?) who does the charts' website is the time (4:47).
My listing of the time of the Tiga remix as 4:47 was an error on my part. I had confused it with the Lobe remix, which is indeed 4:47. As someone else has noted here, the Tiga remix is, I believe, 5:35.

I apologize for the error and confusion. I've now made the necessary corrections on my website.

Posted: Mon 22 May 2006, 12:51 pm
by Paulo
Regardless of the length of the remix, it's still crap. :)

Posted: Mon 22 May 2006, 6:31 pm
by virtual1
But seriously, when did you last hear a track that's been 'remodelled' and just not remixed and it was near being listenable? :-P

Posted: Mon 22 May 2006, 10:42 pm
by Kandu
What a load of rubbish.

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 2:53 am
by mole973102
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamenta ... onus_CD.29

It is on the second 12" according to here.
I've also added the iTunes links at nearly 3am.

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 2:57 am
by mole973102
mole973102 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamenta ... onus_CD.29

It is on the second 12" according to here.
I've also added the iTunes links at nearly 3am.
I wouldn't buy the vinyls for one track. However, I would download it or buy the Japanese import maybe (if I liked it enough). Probably be on the next single though :(

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 5:18 am
by patrick
virtual1 wrote:But seriously, when did you last hear a track that's been 'remodelled' and just not remixed and it was near being listenable?
What's the difference? I love the Lobe mix of Minimal for example...

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 5:39 am
by retrofuturist
virtual1 wrote:But seriously, when did you last hear a track that's been 'remodelled' and just not remixed and it was near being listenable? :-P
Don't exactly understand how you distinguish between "Remodelled" and "Remixed" but
Richard X's remixes of New Order's Jetstream are far superior to the original.

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 10:45 am
by kimphilby
I can't hear it on the link. Is it that bad? Would it sound good off yer head in a club?
'Minimal' is the obvious dance track on the album and it would be great if there was a big, Pete Tong-Tastic, feel good, clubathon remix.

And it be on the physical cd single :!:

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 11:26 am
by !
kimphilby wrote:I can't hear it on the link. Is it that bad? Would it sound good off yer head in a club?
'Minimal' is the obvious dance track on the album and it would be great if there was a big, Pete Tong-Tastic, feel good, clubathon remix.

And it be on the physical cd single :!:
http://www.tiga.ca/audio.php?id=35

Click on the red title/banner thing :wink:

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 11:32 am
by kimphilby
I don't think it sounds that bad, probably much better on a decent set of speakers.
It's not the big clubby, wave your arms in the air tune it could be though.
Something for the chavs!

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 11:33 am
by kimphilby
Cheers btw !

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 11:52 am
by joeythecat
Actually it is much better than the abysmal e-smoove or westbam mixes... which are by far the worst PSB mixes of all time. A bit left of field but actually a bit more interesting than the generic thump thump thump mix Ii expected... I listened all the way through. :mrgreen:

Posted: Tue 23 May 2006, 2:04 pm
by ChoonHound
Yeah, it's ok. What's with all this Tech House crap though? Ick, boring.

Minimal a hands-in-the-air-choon?" ...eh, maybe.

Posted: Mon 29 May 2006, 11:23 pm
by Pacific707
AHHHHHHH IT'S MINIMAL + THE SOUND OF THE ATOM SPLITTING