Page 2 of 3

Re: Awful Tower of London review

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 2:33 pm
by Nickname
Burj wrote:
nickname wrote:who knows.
Least of all you, eh?

How much are your 'girlfriends' rates these days? An hourly rate?
My English is so bad, I can't understand you. :lol:

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 2:33 pm
by bookshopboy
The review featured in the Independent on Sunday, which also included a list of the 101 most importants gays and lesbians in the UK...

Neil Tennant was there too.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 2:34 pm
by Burj
SP was Melody Maker's most vociferous promoter of all things Romo a few years back. Nuff said.

Re: Awful Tower of London review

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 2:37 pm
by Burj
nickname wrote:
Burj wrote:
nickname wrote:who knows.
Least of all you, eh?

How much are your 'girlfriends' rates these days? An hourly rate?
My English is so bad, I can't understand you. :lol:
As long as they kiss, that's the main thing.

Re: Awful Tower of London review

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 2:44 pm
by !
nickname wrote:
Burj wrote:
nickname wrote:who knows.
Least of all you, eh?

How much are your 'girlfriends' rates these days? An hourly rate?
My English is so bad, I can't understand you. :lol:
He's saying your girlfriends were/are hookers. :wink:

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 7:02 pm
by Janet Street-Porter
Simon Price is fantastic - he has always loved PSB.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 7:13 pm
by Burj
Janet Street-Porter wrote:Simon Price is fantastic - he has always loved PSB.
Yes, and synth/poofy pop in general. :)

Re: Awful Tower of London review

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 8:34 pm
by ArseSpanker
nickname wrote:My girlfriend and ex-girlfriends don't think the same but who knows.
Same here, it's causing me an awful lot of grief. Sorry, I mean ex-girlfriend. I'm disagree.

Hey! I love Simon Price as much as I love nickname and I recognise what he's saying, as, I suspect, would Neil. He's just saying represssion suited them, not commenting about homosexuality. It's also not a bad review.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:03 pm
by Danny C
I read the review and I thought I recognised the simpering studenty smugness of it as it dripped off the screen.

Simon Price is utterly f*cking useless and I have no idea how he is able to get such plum reviewing and interviewing jobs.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:17 pm
by Drico One
This thread sums up the abject gormlessness that has swamped this forum in recent months. A perfectly thoughtful and well argued point, spliced with a little eye-catching controversy, and the poof police are out to scream from the rooftops.

Then again, it's been a long time since erudition counted for much around here.

An excellent review lost on the usual suspects. Having been at the Liverpool show on Sunday, I was left feeling a little queasy by the celebratory nature of the event. While the dynamic duo deserve to be embraced with genuine love, much of their impact is invested in slightly cool understatement. The current show eschews that for a party approach that, while enjoyable, divests the emotional highs of their impact. It's all one big funfair. To my mind at least, they've always been about a little more than mere fun.

Simon Price makes a similar point in an eyecatching manner. His review is far more prescient than some wish to accept.

Drico.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:20 pm
by Burj
Have you not seen the video of Discovery? :roll:

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:21 pm
by Drico One
Of course. And your point is?

Drico.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:23 pm
by Burj
Erm, well obviously the 'party approach' has been done before. Even Neil referred to Discovery as 'cheap and cheerful sh1t entertainment' a few years back. There was very little that was cool about it.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:26 pm
by Drico One
Burj wrote:Erm, well obviously the 'party approach' has been done before. Even Neil referred to Discovery as 'cheap and cheerful sh1t entertainment' a few years back. There was very little that was cool about it.
And what exactly has the fact that it has been done before got to do with the simple point that the celebratory approach can take the edge off much of their impact?

Price suggested the loss of subtlety in such a tack is something to bemoan. In my view, he's entirely correct. Whether it was lost in Brazil 12 years ago is really quite irrelevant.

Drico.

Posted: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 11:33 pm
by Burj
Drico One wrote:Price suggested the loss of subtlety in such a tack is something to bemoan. In my view, he's entirely correct. Whether it was lost in Brazil 12 years ago is really quite irrelevant.

Drico.
Well you said that "To my mind at least, they've always been about a little more than mere fun." But I think you can safely say that since 1993 there's been a lot more 'fun' and a lot less 'cool'. Well maybe not Release, ahem.

I'm not saying that's a good thing, but I just wanted to point out to you that the 'party approach' of the new show that made you so ever so slightly queasy is not new, so you should have had a rough idea of what to expect. No point hankering after the long-gone glory days of the past. PSB have changed whether we like it or not.