Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 4:22 pm
by Pacific707
no doubt they have made millions
but it costs a lot to be rich. Taxes and everything, there is a lot of rich people that go in debt because of taxes. Also there is the fact they have to live. You cant just make a bunch of cash and just sit naked in the middle of a park doing nothing and never spend it. Those Russian history books have to cost something. I think PSB are quite intelligent so I would guess they have cash in investments and stuff.
Also you don' t need to live every minute of your life in decadence when your rich. That being said I am sure the PSB live quite comfortably.
I would not mind the cash from West End girls alone I am sure that would be more than enough to enjoy the fine things in life
Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 4:41 pm
by stoo
i remember reading in smash hits while they were promoting so hard that they had "only just" become millionaires quite recentley! quite good for 3 albums and a remix album if you ask me
Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 5:16 pm
by Fugitive1979
They've certainly made the most of their "Opportunities" and made "lots of money".

Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 5:23 pm
by stoo
that was poor

Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 5:32 pm
by Fugitive1979
stoo wrote:that was poor

I know, but it had to be done. Sorry.

Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 7:47 pm
by rabagast
stoo wrote:i remember reading in smash hits while they were promoting so hard that they had "only just" become millionaires quite recentley! quite good for 3 albums and a remix album if you ask me
There's quite a long delay before royalties are paid out, so that should make sense.
Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 8:08 pm
by PopArt
Just their property alone makes them quite rich. Neil owns a 3 bedroom house in an exclusive Square in Chelsea. That has to be worth about £3 - £4 million. Plus his house in Co Durham
Chris had his flat in EC1 (for those that don't know it's really central London) on the market recently at £895,000. I think it's sold now though.
You add to that all the investments (hasn't Neil spent quite a bit on paintings?) that they must have and they are two wealthy young men.
I am sure that they do have to play concerts to pay tax bills but that's merely a cashflow thing.
Posted: Wed 14 Feb 2007, 9:10 pm
by DazzerUKUK
of course they are millionaires.
1) The back catalogue is worth a fortune and should they chose to sell it all, that would make them a tidy sum.
2) Property. Neil owns at least two properties. One in Chelsea. The Chelsea property alone would make Neil a millionaire.

Posted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 2:51 pm
by psb-freak
PopArt wrote:Just their property alone makes them quite rich. Neil owns a 3 bedroom house in an exclusive Square in Chelsea. That has to be worth about £3 - £4 million. Plus his house in Co Durham
Chris had his flat in EC1 (for those that don't know it's really central London) on the market recently at £895,000. I think it's sold now though.
You add to that all the investments (hasn't Neil spent quite a bit on paintings?) that they must have and they are two wealthy young men.
I am sure that they do have to play concerts to pay tax bills but that's merely a cashflow thing.
Chris´s flat has been sold. At least I can´t see it on Hampton´s website anymore.
Re: "I used to think PSB would be millionaires & th
Posted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 5:31 pm
by Darkmoon
Peter Hook wrote:"...It’s the same misconception I used to have. I meet people and think they’re millionaires and they’re not. I used to think The Pet Shop Boys would be millionaires and they’re not!..."
...I
used to think...
Doesn't that mean he does not think this anymore?

Posted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 8:22 pm
by moxlox
I remember years ago in Select magazine, sort of circa 1995, they listed the richest indie bands (according to them anyway).
Rather surprisingly Pet Shop Boys were number 1.
The surprising bit to me at the time was not that PSB were number 1, but that they were listed as an indie "band" in essentially an indie oriented magazine. The reason they were listed as an indie band was because they owned the royalities to their songs or some such arrangement where Parlophone didn't.
...I used to love that Select magazine, though it did go down the dumper somewhat in its last year.
Posted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 9:18 pm
by Vince
So is making (good) music a profitable business or not?
Posted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 10:15 pm
by You Choose
yeh,
chris has wore that yellow hoody far to much ( was wearing it around the popart release i.e MIRACLES video)and has certainly got the wear out of that hat!
Posted: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 10:39 pm
by stoo
Vince wrote:So is making (good) music a profitable business or not?
of course it is, its better than working

Posted: Fri 16 Feb 2007, 12:35 pm
by NJTom
I'm sure they have made pretty wise pension payments, according to Q magazine, even Kate Bush in the early 90s was putting half a mil a year away